How does this morning’s news affect the global order, rule of law and the future of democracies? A thread…
We need to wake up: Putin wants to recreate the USSR & is ready to face us down as he thinks we won’t risk WW3. The most successful international order in the history of humanity - which has allowed millions to live in freedom & lifted millions out of poverty - is under threat.
This means a long term strategy as well as a tactical response. The Cold War lasted 43 years at the end of which democracy prevailed without a shot being fired. How do we make that happen a second time but more quickly?
Firstly economic sanctions are fine but Putin has already predicted and discounted them. What we do needs to be big enough to prevent the Russian state funding the Russian military.
That means stopping buying $330m of gas every day from Russia (as the West did even without Nordstream 2) and shutting out Russian money from London. But given that Russia has $600 bn of reserves it will take many years to achieve. We need to be in this for the long term.
Secondly an effective military response is crucial. Direct combat between NATO and Russian troops is very risky and would be the first time there has been a military conflict between two UN security council nuclear powers.
But that does not mean we cannot offer military support to the Ukrainians to make this invasion as difficult as possible. Ukraine needs to be a millstone round Putin’s neck not a triumphant step towards the restoration of the USSR.
Thirdly and more challengingly Europe surely now needs to match the 3.5% of GDP that the US spends on defence. The UK’s integrated review was a step in the right direction but is now out of date. Surely the UK cannot be cutting the army at a time like this?
If there is to be a global alliance of democracies to defend the rule of law, European countries need to show their willingness to step up in our own back yard.
Finally we cannot look at Russia and China separately. Both are deeply committed to upending the US/UK designed post-45 order. China will look at what happens in Ukraine carefully to gauge what the Western response would be to an invasion of Taiwan.
But even on a grim day like today we should not lose hope. Authoritarian leaders always underestimate the resolve of democracies. We can be slow to get going but an alliance of countries with a shared belief in freedom will always have an unshakeable resolve.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Last night’s ‘Maternity Scandal’ #panorama on Shrewsbury was a tough watch. Hard to comprehend that an inquiry I originally commissioned to look into 23 cases has now uncovered 2000+ families whose lives were devastated by poor maternity care at one NHS trust.
Struck again - as I was in 2017 when I met Richard & Rhiannon Davies - by the raw grit & courage of families who relive the avoidable death of their child daily to prevent other families facing similar tragedy. Compelling account of their bravery here: bbc.co.uk/news/health-60…
There will be much more to say when the final Ockenden report comes out shortly. As @DHSCgovuk primary focus moves on from covid, ministers must make a comprehensive response to this report their top priority.
I understand the practical reasons why we have abandoned mandatory vaccinations but think the U-turn is completely wrong. Here's why…
I was intending to introduce mandatory flu vaccinations in my final year as Health Secretary before I was moved to another role.
I considered the issue carefully, with all the sensitivities involved, but concluded it was non-negotiable that staff working with highly vulnerable people should do everything possible to protect them against asymptomatic disease. If that isn't 'do no harm' what is?
A few thoughts on the government’s GP rescue plan announced today….firstly they are right to address crisis in this sector. Some good ideas including a new NHS covenant modeled on the military and more transparency about performance.
BUT, as someone who tried & failed to get 5000 more GPs into the system, I don’t think this package will turn the tide. We got 000s more graduates into GP surgeries, but we didn't make progress because experienced GPs were retiring/going part time faster than new trainees arrived
The lesson? This is a burnt-out workforce running on empty because of a massive mismatch between supply & demand. The only thing that will convince them not to continue retiring or opting for part-time hours in droves is a clear plan to end the unsustainable pressure they face.
Today’s report is most important my Select Committee has done. Taken over a year with lengthy evidence sessions (7 hours in the case of Dominic Cummings) but shows, I hope, parliament at its best as we deliver far reaching conclusions about our pandemic response…
Recommendations significant for 2 reasons: 1. unanimous agreement by 22 x-party MPs - as non-partisan as it’s possible to get. 2. Will be most comprehensive independent study ahead of public inquiry that may not publish for several years.
We conclude that our national response was a curate’s egg of disastrous mistakes and extraordinary genius. The first lockdown was too late & based on flawed scientific advice which should have been challenged earlier.
As health select committee chair most of the time I focus on holding the Govt to account on health. But occasionally opposition parties need to be called out too - never more so than today….
It’s outrageous that Lab & Lib Dems will vote against £12bn extra for the NHS & soc care after the year we’ve had. This is politicking of the worst kind because the crisis in the NHS & care system is real. Any wealth tax v unlikely to raise the sums needed for ageing population.
But even though it was tough for a Conservative PM & Chx to raise taxes, what comes next - turning money into results with proper reform - will be even tougher. Having dipped our hands into their pockets voters will be very angry if they don't see tangible improvements fast.
Lots of noise on social care and a possible new tax to pay for it...my thoughts in this thread.
It’s progress that the soc care debate has moved on from 'whether' to 'how.' This isn’t just because it wld breach the PM's words on the steps of Downing Street, but a growing realisation that with the Covid backlog we’ll never get the NHS back on its feet without soc care reform
Let's take as starting point the HSC report which said the sector needs min £7 bn annual raise in its budget over 4-5 years. This covers a cap, demographic changes and increases in the national living wage but not a big expansion of quality or eligibility committees.parliament.uk/work/136/socia…