Shaun Lawson Profile picture
Feb 24 16 tweets 3 min read
The statement is extraordinarily foolish and the speed of their furious backpedalling leaves me wondering if the Labour MPs who signed it even read it.

Without even mentioning the Tories' dodgy beyond belief financial dealings, it blames Britain (!) for war having broken out.
Because we "talked up the threat of war". 🙄🙄🙄

No. It was to warn the peoples of the world what was coming - and especially to counter Russian disinformation, which will manifest itself as never before now.

The intelligence said Russia would invade. Russia has invaded.
The statement also predictably blames NATO and denies Ukraine has any sovereign right to join it or any other military alliance - despite everything we're seeing today confirming why it was so frantic to join.

The contempt it shows Ukraine is breathtaking.
The statement drones on about the Minsk Agreements when Putin has just ripped them up, forever. As a proposed solution, it's about as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike.

And it 100% undermines the pressing need for the Labour Party to show it isn't anti-Western or anti-British
Those behind the statement display zero awareness of how diplomacy is ever successful. Strong, effective diplomacy is backed by strong, effective deterrents.
It's all been signed by people in comfy First World homes who have never known the horror of facing their country being wiped off the map - and who have never known what it's like to face persecution, imprisonment or death for saying what they think.
Starmer is quite right to have threatened what he did.

Those who signed it are quite right to have backtracked toute de suite.

The Stop the West Coalition are beyond parody. Exhibiting every single stupid stereotype about why so many look at the left and roll their eyes.
I'll say it again. These people would've blamed Britain for World War Two and demanded we sue for peace based on the Munich agreement.

In other words: these people would've let everyone in Europe be tyrannised, and my fellow Jews, every last one of them, all be murdered.
I also note with disdain the statement complaining furiously about Britain having sent arms to Ukraine.

That is to say: it COMPLAINS about us giving a little help to a frantic nation which is hideously outnumbered in weapons and materiel, above all in the air.
Which once again reminds me: these are exactly the same people who refused help for the Yazidis when they faced genocide and being sold into sex slavery - despite the sovereign Iraqi government pleading for our help, as the sovereign Ukrainian government has here.
These people claim to be all about international law when the US or UK breaks it. Then suddenly, they don't even mention it when an anti-Western nation breaks it.
And you know what? It's perfectly possible these people - and you, and me - wouldn't even exist without NATO having protected all of us. That's maybe what sickens me most of all.

Well - that and describing a democratically elected, pro-European government as a 'regime'. Unreal.
Oh yes, and attacking NATO for Yugoslavia as well. What's the matter guys? Pining for the Warsaw Pact are we?

It actually treats the Russian and Ukrainian governments as equally guilty. Putin must be thrilled at such absolute, disgraceful, treacherous lunacy.
In short: decadent, arrogant, ignorant beyond belief idiots.

Who will never know how much their ignorance exposes how decadent they truly are.
No – through th'extended globe his feelings run
As broad and general as th'unbounded sun!
No narrow bigot he; – his reason'd view
Thy interests, England, ranks with thine, Peru!
France at our doors, he sees no danger nigh,
But heaves for Turkey's woes the impartial sigh;
A steady patriot of the world alone,
The friend of every country – but his own.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shaun Lawson

Shaun Lawson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shaunjlawson

Feb 25
Someone just asked me how long I think the war will last. Well - it depends on your definition really.

Of course, nobody really knows... but what I anticipate is as follows.

1. Kyiv falls within days. Zelensky is likely killed. A puppet government is installed.
2. The rest of Ukraine also falls - in a manner of speaking - within weeks. But...

3. That's when the guerilla fighting really kicks in. With Russia, claiming to be in 'control', sustaining constant casualties which undermine Putin back home.
4. Western sanctions steadily ratchet up. Nobody other than rogue states recognise the puppet government; the Russian economy falls into ever greater disrepair; the already appalled Russian people become gradually more and more fed up.
Read 16 tweets
Feb 24
You know someone's away with the fairies when they use FOX News' slogan in support of their total non-case.

But in the meantime, could you tell us what is 'fair and balanced' about:

1. Blaming Britain but not blaming the country that's just invaded its neighbour
2. Treating the country that's been invaded and the country that's invaded it as equivalent

3. Complaining about any support of any kind being given to the country that's been invaded

4. Referring to a dead diplomatic agreement which has been ripped up by the aggressor
5. Referring to a democratically elected government as a 'regime'

6. Citing public annoucements of entirely accurate intelligence about the likelihood of an invasion as 'pouring oil on the fire' (in other words, STWC would rather not know, cos the truth is VERY AWKWARD for them)
Read 6 tweets
Feb 24
Imagine you're Russian: maybe well-educated, maybe not. Apart from Telegram🙄, what news sites are you looking at right now?

Here's one: Ria. Owned by the Russian state... and as Google Translate reveals, completely full of shit.

ria.ru

But there are others.
If you want something rather more honest, try Dozhd (TV Rain). Operating out of Russia, and designated by Moscow as a 'foreign agent' only last year.

BECAUSE IT TELLS THE TRUTH.

Unfortunately, a subscription is required here. I wonder if it'll survive.

tvrain.ru
Current stories from it include all Russian media reporting on Ukraine now being required to only use information and data from "official Russian sources" (ie. the government) on pain of having their websites blocked and fines of up to 5 million rubles (about 60,000 US dollars).
Read 7 tweets
Feb 24
At this dreadful hour, I'm not just thinking of the Ukrainian people. I'm also thinking of the Russian people.

A people who are bombarded, day after day after day, with completely fake news. Which speaks in dark tones of 'genocide' against Russians in Ukraine.
Which ever since 2014, has insisted that Ukraine has been taken over by 'Nazis'.

That's despite the far right having one single seat out of 450 in the Ukrainian Parliament. And despite, too, almost all parties represented in that Parliament being pro-European.
It's even despite the Ukrainian President himself being Jewish.

The reason the appalling Viktor Yanukovych was brought down was he wilfully ignored the wishes of his people. Instead, he jailed political opponents, rigged elections, and slaughtered 100 protestors.
Read 30 tweets
Feb 23
Aw, I so wish I still had the plot Art. I so wish I was like people who:

1. Thought Rebecca Long-Bailey would be a successful Labour leader

2. Complained angrily of 'PLP racism' when Dawn Butler struggled to get enough nominations, only to all pile in behind Richard Burgon
3. All still act like it's 2017, not 2022

4. Some of whom think Jeremy Corbyn could magically have solved this crisis, like they think he also magically solved Northern Ireland

5. Insist there's only one reason for Labour's defeat in 2019, when there are very many
6. Insisted a London-based Remainer could never win back the Red Wall, yet he's winning back the Red Wall

7. Used a massive child abuse scandal to lie through their teeth and parrot far-right conspiracies about Keir Starmer, with zero regard for the victims' suffering whatsoever
Read 13 tweets
Feb 23
Except that, er, NATO are not in the wrong. I'll say this very simply. NATO IS NOT A THREAT TO RUSSIA.

What do people who argue this think NATO plans on doing? Invade Russia? Take over Russia?!

But the countries of Eastern Europe need protection *against* Russia.
If people on here know this little history, that's their problem.

The countries of Eastern Europe haven't joined NATO or want to join NATO because they want to invade Russia. It's because they want to stop Russia EVER INVADING THEM AGAIN.
They want to stop a nuclear kleptocratic mafia state ruled by an iron fist invading them. Which has already invaded Georgia, invaded Ukraine, denied Ukraine's right to exist, and its leader described USSR's collapse as "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century".
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(