Shaun Lawson Profile picture
Feb 24 6 tweets 2 min read
You know someone's away with the fairies when they use FOX News' slogan in support of their total non-case.

But in the meantime, could you tell us what is 'fair and balanced' about:

1. Blaming Britain but not blaming the country that's just invaded its neighbour
2. Treating the country that's been invaded and the country that's invaded it as equivalent

3. Complaining about any support of any kind being given to the country that's been invaded

4. Referring to a dead diplomatic agreement which has been ripped up by the aggressor
5. Referring to a democratically elected government as a 'regime'

6. Citing public annoucements of entirely accurate intelligence about the likelihood of an invasion as 'pouring oil on the fire' (in other words, STWC would rather not know, cos the truth is VERY AWKWARD for them)
7. Actually attacking NATO for having stopped ethnic cleansing and genocide in Europe

8. Denying, outright, Ukraine's right to take its own sovereign decisions and pursue its own democratic destiny

9. Ignoring, 100%, why the peoples of Eastern Europe need military protection
The statement is an absolute bleedin' embarrassment. The definition of victim blaming and apologia for imperialism.

Labour MPs who signed it backtracked very fast because they realised what an absolute bleedin' embarrassment it is.
All the while, a bunch of goons on here who know no shame and have no conscience just lap it up.

Putin's useful idiots. 'Fair and balanced'?! GTFOOH.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shaun Lawson

Shaun Lawson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shaunjlawson

Feb 25
Someone just asked me how long I think the war will last. Well - it depends on your definition really.

Of course, nobody really knows... but what I anticipate is as follows.

1. Kyiv falls within days. Zelensky is likely killed. A puppet government is installed.
2. The rest of Ukraine also falls - in a manner of speaking - within weeks. But...

3. That's when the guerilla fighting really kicks in. With Russia, claiming to be in 'control', sustaining constant casualties which undermine Putin back home.
4. Western sanctions steadily ratchet up. Nobody other than rogue states recognise the puppet government; the Russian economy falls into ever greater disrepair; the already appalled Russian people become gradually more and more fed up.
Read 16 tweets
Feb 24
The statement is extraordinarily foolish and the speed of their furious backpedalling leaves me wondering if the Labour MPs who signed it even read it.

Without even mentioning the Tories' dodgy beyond belief financial dealings, it blames Britain (!) for war having broken out.
Because we "talked up the threat of war". 🙄🙄🙄

No. It was to warn the peoples of the world what was coming - and especially to counter Russian disinformation, which will manifest itself as never before now.

The intelligence said Russia would invade. Russia has invaded.
The statement also predictably blames NATO and denies Ukraine has any sovereign right to join it or any other military alliance - despite everything we're seeing today confirming why it was so frantic to join.

The contempt it shows Ukraine is breathtaking.
Read 16 tweets
Feb 24
Imagine you're Russian: maybe well-educated, maybe not. Apart from Telegram🙄, what news sites are you looking at right now?

Here's one: Ria. Owned by the Russian state... and as Google Translate reveals, completely full of shit.

ria.ru

But there are others.
If you want something rather more honest, try Dozhd (TV Rain). Operating out of Russia, and designated by Moscow as a 'foreign agent' only last year.

BECAUSE IT TELLS THE TRUTH.

Unfortunately, a subscription is required here. I wonder if it'll survive.

tvrain.ru
Current stories from it include all Russian media reporting on Ukraine now being required to only use information and data from "official Russian sources" (ie. the government) on pain of having their websites blocked and fines of up to 5 million rubles (about 60,000 US dollars).
Read 7 tweets
Feb 24
At this dreadful hour, I'm not just thinking of the Ukrainian people. I'm also thinking of the Russian people.

A people who are bombarded, day after day after day, with completely fake news. Which speaks in dark tones of 'genocide' against Russians in Ukraine.
Which ever since 2014, has insisted that Ukraine has been taken over by 'Nazis'.

That's despite the far right having one single seat out of 450 in the Ukrainian Parliament. And despite, too, almost all parties represented in that Parliament being pro-European.
It's even despite the Ukrainian President himself being Jewish.

The reason the appalling Viktor Yanukovych was brought down was he wilfully ignored the wishes of his people. Instead, he jailed political opponents, rigged elections, and slaughtered 100 protestors.
Read 30 tweets
Feb 23
Aw, I so wish I still had the plot Art. I so wish I was like people who:

1. Thought Rebecca Long-Bailey would be a successful Labour leader

2. Complained angrily of 'PLP racism' when Dawn Butler struggled to get enough nominations, only to all pile in behind Richard Burgon
3. All still act like it's 2017, not 2022

4. Some of whom think Jeremy Corbyn could magically have solved this crisis, like they think he also magically solved Northern Ireland

5. Insist there's only one reason for Labour's defeat in 2019, when there are very many
6. Insisted a London-based Remainer could never win back the Red Wall, yet he's winning back the Red Wall

7. Used a massive child abuse scandal to lie through their teeth and parrot far-right conspiracies about Keir Starmer, with zero regard for the victims' suffering whatsoever
Read 13 tweets
Feb 23
Except that, er, NATO are not in the wrong. I'll say this very simply. NATO IS NOT A THREAT TO RUSSIA.

What do people who argue this think NATO plans on doing? Invade Russia? Take over Russia?!

But the countries of Eastern Europe need protection *against* Russia.
If people on here know this little history, that's their problem.

The countries of Eastern Europe haven't joined NATO or want to join NATO because they want to invade Russia. It's because they want to stop Russia EVER INVADING THEM AGAIN.
They want to stop a nuclear kleptocratic mafia state ruled by an iron fist invading them. Which has already invaded Georgia, invaded Ukraine, denied Ukraine's right to exist, and its leader described USSR's collapse as "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century".
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(