Jessica Price Profile picture
Feb 24 9 tweets 2 min read
I've seen a lot of people praising this as willingness to not be bound by rules, or caring more about people than "2000-year-old religious laws"

but I think it's important to note that prioritizing saving a life is *actually a rule with formal legal weight* in Judaism
The idea that throwing out rules to obey your heart is the highest form of virtue is actually a very Christian take on things--Christianity has always had a strong antinomian bent, at least on paper
But Judaism *isn't* about tossing everything out the window if you think you're obeying a higher calling

it's about recognizing that Grand Moral Principles are useless without a strategy for implementation
So for us, having a legal principle that supersedes almost all others

AND spending time in the weediest of weeds for edge cases and details and working out what the rules actually look like

are not opposed
it's not about "the letter of the law vs. the spirit of the law"

it's about understanding that "the spirit of the law" is basically just blather unless you've worked out what it looks like when *put into* letters

we care about *practice*
Pikuach nefesh--the Jewish principle that saving a life trumps almost every other obligation--isn't about "throwing the rules out the window"

It is, itself, a rule, and it's part of a *system* of rules.
It's not throwing away the entire system of rules.

There are things that you still can't do even to save a life: e.g. premeditated murder or forcing someone to have sex with you.

And that only makes sense as *part* of a system, not a dismissal of systems.
And working out details of how to put rules into practice is actually the work of *living in a community* where people have different needs and preferences and experiences and just airily saying "do unto others" actually results in people getting hurt.
Prioritizing saving trans kids' lives over rules about gender presentation is actually *very much* a systemic, rule-based Jewish approach.

Rules aren't inherently bad or oppressive. They're part of how humans avoid harming each other.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jessica Price

Jessica Price Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Delafina777

Feb 24
Hmm, I’m really curious if this is a difference between ADD and ADHD? I don’t know if I know anyone with ADHD, but I have a LOT of close friends with ADD and this really doesn’t track with how they describe their own experiences.
I mean, hell, one of my friends with pretty severe ADD is also the one who can lay out each step of moving a piece of furniture for me to minimize the likelihood of damaging myself, the furniture, the walls, or the floor.
I also have a friend with aphantasia, who doesn’t have ADD, so it’s weird to hear it described as a component because some of my friends with ADD are artists and don’t have any trouble forming mental images.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 20
Reading Christian commentary on the parable of the Good Samaritan and 90% of it is "the kohen and the Levite wouldn't help the man because Ritual Purity" and 90% of that includes "so it was a GENTILE who helped!!!" & it's amazing how so many "experts" can be this blatantly wrong.
Seriously, Christians doing commentary on parables, get the words "ritual purity" and "unclean" out of your mouths.

You get it wrong every. single. time.
But I've already talked about that a million times, so instead I want to focus on the whole line of commentary that's "it was a marginalized person/'unclean' enemy/gentile who was the one who helped!"
Read 32 tweets
Feb 17
I read a lot of YA because it’s where some of the more interesting SFF stuff is happening, but that also means I also start reading a lot of stuff that’s not great and boy howdy let’s talk about the normalization of white Christian society in dystopian YA stuff.
Like, if you’ve followed me for any length of time, you’re probably aware of how frustrated I get that a lot of internet atheists seem unable to perceive just how Christian their vision of a secular society is.
But WOW does a lot of YA worldbuilding have the same problem.

And that means that there’s a lot of unacknowledged genocide lurking offstage in these books.

And not acknowledging it feels like a really big *problem.*
Read 37 tweets
Feb 17
The most toxic masculinity--and contempt for their own kids--I've encountered has been among white-collar men.

The contractors who put in my floors brought their children. They had festive music on, they were laughing and talking and so affectionate with the kids.
Like, I came home from the grocery store, and a bunch of the older boys (probably middle school? I can't tell child ages) were hanging out around one of the trucks and they asked if they could help me carry in my groceries.
We walked inside, and there was music and people talking and laughing and kids running around and I remember just being stunned by how *festive* it felt (and in the middle of 2021, it'd been a long time since I'd been to a party)...
Read 4 tweets
Feb 16
you geniuses attempted to erect a paywall to content you don't own and you're surprised that the actual owner of the content objected?

cryptobros continually being surprised by the existence of IP law is the funniest thing on Al Gore's internet
no, it's forbidding someone with no ownership rights to the IP from profiting off it--nothing's stopping WOTC from creating a Magic presence in web3 (ew)

they're just saying YOU can't do it, champ

Like, look, NFTs are gross and I hope they die a dramatic and ugly death and all these grifters trying to NFT other people's work end up both humiliated and owing the artists they're stealing from a LOT of money
Read 11 tweets
Feb 16
I'm about 75% of the way through the new @MaintenancePod episode on Supersize Me, and it's been making me think of something I'd really like to hear @yrfatfriend and @RottenInDenmark take on: the way the language of addiction is ab/used around eating.
maintenancephase.com
Like, if there's one thing you come to understand by listening to a lot of Maintenance Phase, it's that America has a *deeply* unhealthy relationship to food and weight.
And I'm noticing, in the media they talk about, when it's talking about fat people, or to people who want to lose weight, how there's this leitmotiv of "addiction," whether it's implicit or explicit.

Like people are addicted to food.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(