What the Russian invasion of Ukraine means for the world going forward:
1. Volatility begets volatility. When something crazy happens, the chance that other crazy things will happen goes up. It's not a coincidence that Canada is freezing peoples' assets and Russia invaded
Ukraine after the most significant event in most of our lives, Covid. To give an example of why things like this happen, other countries around the world may look at what Russia did and say "Wow, I can do that." and when they do, we get another significant event.
2. It's an invitation for China to take Taiwan. China can do the same exact strategy as Russia. Instead of massing troops in Belarus, Crimea, and Donbass, the Chinese can (they'll need some time for naval improvement) just mass boats, missiles, etc and then just swallow Taiwan.
Kind of like Putin didn't invade until the Olympics were over, if I were Xi, I'd ask Putin to mass troops somewhere in Europe to make it look like he was going to invade and then the Chinese take Taiwan.
3. Inflation — so this one is interesting. Everyone thought that Russia was going to get sanctioned hard, which would drive up Russian and Ukrainian exports of fertilizer, grain, oil, and gas, but the US didn't mess with that. AFAICT the sanction response was totally toothless.
With that said, I don't know what Europe did. This invasion probably gives the Fed a reason not to hike this March which means that inflation should keep picking up steam. Wars tend to be negative GDP, but inflationary, so it's hard to say.
5. This invasion was a massive black mark on the US dollar. I think it was Krugman who said that "the dollar is backed by men with guns" — well, between Afghanistan and Ukraine, by this logic, the dollar's "backing" has taken a hit. Then, when you sanction dollar-denominated
transactions of Russian banks and Russian companies, you're asking them to use a different currency, which again, is not good for the dollar. Peace and financial transactions globally are predicated on the US being powerful enough to enforce stuff, but as the US retreats, we get
a really interesting question where countries like Argentina start to think to themselves "why do I need to pay back my dollar-denominated debt?" — maybe they don't. What is USA going to do? Sanction you? Even further, let's say you were a Ukrainian who stacked dollars because
the Ukrainian currency sucked. How do you get that money converted now with the US sanctioning Russian banks? Using the US financial system to wage war does not make the US financial system stronger; it's the opposite.
6. As Naval said, Pax Americanus is over. That means we have a few decades of uncertainty and volatility ahead of us. Could be not fun (hopefully no nuclear war). I will deal with this by staying flexible, keeping some insurance, derisking, and keeping cash and an open mind.
Americans are used to have everyone kissing their feet. That's done now. We're just players in a global marketplace now. Get used to it.
PS Biden is 81 in the last year of his term, *gulp*
I think my followers are a little tired about hearing about Ukraine from me, so I'm going to return to our usual programming:
I have a penis infection.
Time for a thread 🧵👇
I went to the doctor today and I got into the examination room and a nurse (female) came in and, because I had written "suspected penis infection" when I booked the appointment, she knew.
And she started to ask me about it.
And well...
I started to think she was going to examine it!
And this, well, I think the technical term is "boner"...
I got a boner.
And then she went to take my blood pressure.
And my heart is beating realllllll fast, I'm thinking to myself:
Hey @robert_zubrin@NRO, I'm going to need a citation and apology for your rewriting of my 3 tweet thread and my followers' replies into your article, which cited neither.
1/4
It's based on the same concept and uses the same terminology.
2/4
And the article is structured in the same way as my 3 tweets.
My company won an appeal in the 5th circuit court of appeals (on all counts).
That's a very good thing, but unfortunately, it's not a precedential decision, meaning it can be cited, but it is not binding.
If I had known that was a possibility I might've settled.
1/3
The best part of the case was a very big Chinese seller using this as their address with Amazon.
And they had the balls to appeal the decision against them on the basis that we didn't properly serve them when we actually went to this address to find an older white woman.
I used to think this was the fatal flaw of Bitcoin.
He’s right that this occurs. Mining is a commodity marker and economies of scale drive concentration, which is bad because it increases the chance of a 51% attack allowing a miner to double spend their Bitcoin.
However, once this occurs, and we would know because you can’t double spend your Bitcoin without someone being on the other side of that, it would cause massive loss of trust not only in the participating miners/their public addresses, but also in the entire network.
One of the dudes I play bball with is an engineer for ercot, the texas agency that is often blamed for the Feb 2021 freeze.
His explanation of last years freeze:
1. Nat gas power plants were not built for such cold temperatures and they broke, not the green wind turbines
1/n
2. There just was not enough power generation. Ercot’s job is to best use the power they are given by the power plants and there was not enough so they had to rotate it between the residential areas.
3. Depending on whether or not the city’s residential grids were shared with critical infrastructure that never loses power eg hosptials, fire, and other city stuff, their experiences were different