Ok, everyone, buckle up.
In this thread, I will be exposing the levels of ludicrousness I’ve discovered since Michael Wooten decided to retweet me two days ago.
What I’m seeing is a conflict of interest so massive his behavior demands an explanation.
In this thread, I will be exposing the levels of ludicrousness I’ve discovered since Michael Wooten decided to retweet me two days ago.
What I’m seeing is a conflict of interest so massive his behavior demands an explanation.
https://twitter.com/wgrzmichael/status/1496341253599936516
TEGNA is “the largest owner of Big Four affiliates in the top 25 markets among independent.”
TEGNA, which owns and operates WGRZ, has a woman on the Board of Directors named Lidia Fonseca.
Lidia Fonseca is the Executive VP and Chief Digital and Tech Officer at #Pfizer.
TEGNA, which owns and operates WGRZ, has a woman on the Board of Directors named Lidia Fonseca.
Lidia Fonseca is the Executive VP and Chief Digital and Tech Officer at #Pfizer.
Wooten worked for TEGNA from 2015-2018. He knows all about TEGNA.
He knows for certain that a high ranking Pfizer executive is on the Board of TEGNA.
Has Wooten met Lidia Fonseca?
He knows for certain that a high ranking Pfizer executive is on the Board of TEGNA.
Has Wooten met Lidia Fonseca?
TEGNA, Pfizer, and Wooten are all very preoccupied with misinformation.
TEGNA’s code of ethics lists combating misinformation at the top of the list.
Albert Bourla says vaccine disinfo is criminal.
His right hand woman is Lidia Fonseca, on the board of TEGNA.
TEGNA’s code of ethics lists combating misinformation at the top of the list.
Albert Bourla says vaccine disinfo is criminal.
His right hand woman is Lidia Fonseca, on the board of TEGNA.
Wooten has repeatedly labeled the allegation of misinformation toward many people, particularly surrounded vaccines and COVID.
Wooten also repeatedly reference #Pfizer, going so far as to quote directly from their documents.
Just look at all these positive references to Pfizer. Just look at them.
Just look at all these positive references to Pfizer. Just look at them.
So, now, let’s get to the meat of the matter. The matter at hand. What started all this.
This is my original tweet. It was in response to an article NOT WRITTEN by WGRZ staff, it was written by an AP medical writer.
The article covered a Lancet study dismissing the Pfizer vaccine as a precipitating event leading to onset of MIS-C.
The article covered a Lancet study dismissing the Pfizer vaccine as a precipitating event leading to onset of MIS-C.
MIS-C Is shorthand for Multisystem Syndrome in Children, a condition I’ve heard of multiple times now as being caused by the vaccine.
Characterized by fever, systemic inflammation, and multi system organ involvement.
All cases are hospitalized.
All cases in children.
Characterized by fever, systemic inflammation, and multi system organ involvement.
All cases are hospitalized.
All cases in children.
The curation of this data is highly suspect. They focused intensively on ruling cases out, and manipulated how the data is tabulated and l expressed.
Median time from most recent vaccine dose to MIS-C onset:
1 dose: 8 days
2 doses: 5 days
ALL 15 patients received PFIZER VACCINE
1 dose: 8 days
2 doses: 5 days
ALL 15 patients received PFIZER VACCINE
You wouldn’t believe this, or maybe you would after I explain in a minute, but the authors of the study cited how rare the condition is…
And we’re unable to determine the vaccine causing MIS-C.
Because perhaps the spike protein caused it
Which bodies produce after vaccination
And we’re unable to determine the vaccine causing MIS-C.
Because perhaps the spike protein caused it
Which bodies produce after vaccination
The study had some 15.
And guess what.
Amazingly, Pfizer funded three of the authors, who SPECIFICALLY:
-“procured and cleaned the data”
-“adjudicated cases”
And guess what.
Amazingly, Pfizer funded three of the authors, who SPECIFICALLY:
-“procured and cleaned the data”
-“adjudicated cases”
So, let’s get this straight, so everyone is on the same page.
PFIZER agents were tasked with investigating a serious adverse event (SAE) from their vaccine, they author all opaque statistic gymnastics, and then claim “we can’t say the vaccine is causing MIS-C.”
PFIZER agents were tasked with investigating a serious adverse event (SAE) from their vaccine, they author all opaque statistic gymnastics, and then claim “we can’t say the vaccine is causing MIS-C.”
Enter @wgrzMichael.
He retweets me, doesn’t address anything related to Lancet study or any of the other points made in my tweet, claims the vaccines are safe, then calls me dangerous and misinformation.
He retweets me, doesn’t address anything related to Lancet study or any of the other points made in my tweet, claims the vaccines are safe, then calls me dangerous and misinformation.
Regarding a study funded and investigated by Pfizer, regarding a disease their vaccine is causing, from a TV anchor that works for WGRZ, which is owned by Tegna, which has a Pfizer executive on their Board of Directors.
Read that again.
Read that again.
I not only standby my initial tweet and claim that Wooten decided to use on his broadcast, I just proved that what I said is true.
Which would make you, Mr. Wooten, the dangerous misinformation agent.
Which would make you, Mr. Wooten, the dangerous misinformation agent.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
