Now that the President has nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson, I’d like to re-post my column on why Biden’s pledge to send a Black woman to the Supreme Court was so significant - and why conservatives are so furious even though it won’t change the balance of power on the Court:
This captures precisely why conservatives feel threatened by this nomination: They understand it symbolizes the recognition that having white men dominate the powerful institutions of American life is a problem that needs to be rectified.
Conservatives fear the acknowledgment that the country’s institutions should reflect the composition of the people; they understand that representation matters, that a Black woman ascending to a position like this is also an acknowledgment of past injustice.
Conservatives saw Biden’s pledge as an indication of how powerful the forces of liberalism, “wokeism,” and multiculturalism – those radically “Un-American” ideas that are threatening “real” (read: white Christian patriarchal) America – have already become.
The fact that a reactionary majority will dominate the Supreme Court for a generation doesn’t do much to alleviate these fears. Conservatives realize that their vision for American society has come under pressure, and not just politically, but even more so culturally.
It is not just political power the Right seeks, but cultural domination and affirmation. And in the cultural sphere, the shift in power away from white conservatives has been more pronounced, leading to the recurring rightwing moral panics of recent years.
It has traditionally been the prerogative of a white male elite to determine what is and what is not acceptable in U.S. society. That prerogative has come under fire, and it’s not something the judiciary can fully restore.
Conservatives understood Biden’s promise as evidence that the dreaded forces responsible for the general assault on white male rule keep ascending within America’s institutions. Whether or not it has any immediate effect on the Court’s decisions, that’s a threat.
Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nomination represents an affirmation of multiracial pluralism. It’s an acknowledgment that the traditional dominance of white men was never the result of meritocratic structures, but of a discriminatory system, and that it’s time to dismantle that system.
A Black woman on the Court will help redefine what the American political, social, and cultural elite looks like – reshape ideas in the collective imaginary of the nation of who gets to be at the top. As multiracial, pluralistic democracy is under assault, that matters a lot.
Addendum: If you need more evidence for what is behind the Right’s furious opposition to the first Black woman nominated for the SC, here’s Tucker with some unadulterated white supremacist rage. Remember: This differs from the broader white male elite grievance in tone only.
This actually made me laugh: Apart from the white grievance whining, this weak sauce is all they have in terms of “substantive” opposition to Ketanji Brown Jackson. Sure looks like Biden made an excellent choice.
This is not some far-right internet troll, but a Republican state senator - and it’s impossible to adequately understand American politics without grappling in earnest with why her radicalism is widely seen as justified on the Right and within the GOP.
Every “Western” society harbors far-right extremists like Rogers who dream of committing acts of fascistic violence. But it’s the fact that the Republican Party embraces and elevates her, and others like her, that constitutes an acute danger to democracy.
Just ignoring this won’t work, because it’s not coming from some rightwing troll, but a Republican elected official who’s in good standing with the rest of her party. No use making fun of it either: These people are in positions of power, intent on using that power.
Take note: Reactionaries and far-right movements across the “West” are siding with Putin. They see him as an ally in the struggle to uphold white Christian patriarchal rule – the kind of authoritarian strongman that can turn the tide against the forces of “woke” pluralism.
None of these rightwingers who are currently professing their sympathy for Putin know much about Russia or care about the specific causes and dynamics of what is going on in Ukraine. What matters to them is an imagined Russia: a stronghold of white patriarchal Christianity.
Putin understands that this is his appeal to Western reactionaries. Democracy is a real threat to him and his regime – not NATO, not Western military might. It is useful to him to be able to present himself as an ally in the fight against “wokeism” and for “traditional values.”
President Joe Biden likes to celebrate his friendship with Mitch McConnell, which is weirdly at odds with the political situation – but captures the stark asymmetry in the way the two sides treat each other quite precisely.
Republicans are engaged in an authoritarian assault on the political system, embrace extremists who fantasize about committing acts of violence against Democrats, and plan on finding a reason, any reason, to impeach Joe Biden as soon as they get the chance.
This is a key point. Every time I mention how the Right is embracing the threat of political violence against supposedly “Un-American” enemies, I get a flurry of “Where were you when those woke barbarians destroyed our cities?! The violence is coming from the Left!!!” replies.
This has become dogma on the Right: That the country is facing an onslaught from a radically “Un-American,” extremist “Left” that is violently threatening to destroy everything the nation is supposed to stand for. And that the Democratic Party has been taken over by those forces.
That’s how they’re giving themselves permission to embrace whatever radical measures are deemed necessary to defeat this “Un-American” enemy. If the nation is under acute threat, nothing is beyond the pale to defend it. Democracy? The rule of law? Who cares!
I mean, politics aside, this is quite bizarre. There is absolutely no evidence presented here. None. A purely ideological statement, masquerading as “journalism.”
I don’t disagree with this - it captures the pathologies of access journalism precisely. I do think, however, that we shouldn’t focus solely on the opportunistic nature, as ideology always defines the limits of opportunism. The person who wrote this piece can’t be fully agnostic.
This, exactly - and these centrists receive active support from journalists who are fully on board with the project of fighting back against the “radical,” “woke” forces that have supposedly advanced too far in the Democratic Party in particular and American life in general.
If anything, I think @sandylocks is being too generous here. It’s hard to see how what we’re witnessing now would have been possible without too many people on the center not just trying to duck away, but actively helping to legitimize the white reactionary counter-mobilization.
A concrete example for what @sandylocks rightfully calls media complicity in this short thread below - absolutely no journalistic justification for the WaPo to publish such bad-faith / illiterate nonsense.
“I defended the crusade against CRT, but I want nothing to do with these authoritarian education bills” is really not a credible position. It was never difficult to discern the white reactionary political project behind the anti-“CRT” moral panic, and what its end goal would be.