Step 1, set the stage and communicate the message. Check the engagement.
Did it rile up our target audience Fantastic!
Feb 23:
Step 2, give the orders to social media foot soldiers to disseminate at scale.
Use our established far-right influencer
network with 100's of thousands of
individual/millions of combined followers.
Feb 23:
Step 2, in published order, please note the timestamps.
Feb 24:
Step 2, continued, in published order, please note the timestamps.
Feb 24:
Step 2, continued, in published order, please note the timestamps.
Feb 24-25:
Step 3, get opinion pieces published
(laundered) in the most high-profile outlets possible.
Continue dissemination (via those with more credibility than social influencers) to appear to be picking up a narrative we NEED ppl to believe originated ~organically~ on social media.
The media will certainly catch on to this, but by that time we'll be on to the next thing.
Despite the media doing their job, the influence operators' stratagem continues to be "flooding the zone with shit', which is difficult to counter and distinguish from organic commentary.
For bonus points, here is an overt response from an intel agency subtly demonstrating their understanding of this op and willingness to use it as a battleground.
X2 bonus: specific complaint from a pundit at the most prominent outfit to launder this influence operation to date.
These accounts have 100s of 1000s, sometimes more than 1m followers.
They receive orders on these narratives & how to promote them, using media power in a coordinated & simultaneously opaque fashion to create impressions of legitimate discourse.
Rinse and repeat next week!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Me in 2023: "If Millennials think we're having a hard time now, the madness & the chaos that would be unleashed in a 2nd Trump presidency would be unmatched by any other point in American history, & I think that none of us want to live through that"
You can see my eye twitching.
Anthony Davis: He knows he's 'Above the Law' and he kind of is.
Me: He kind of is. He kind of is. I mean, when you think about an equivalent, you could think about someone like Elon Musk.
Some stories wound me in the writing. The toll is a stress that burrows deep during research. When the weight grows unbearable, when it overwhelms, I step back, breathe, think. But I will not be ruled by fear. My allegiance is to democracy, and the stakes could not be higher.
The cunning of fear is that it needs no chains. It merely suggests that tomorrow is soon enough, that someone else will speak, and that the risk outweighs the duty. Fear stops the hand before it writes, and closes the throat before it speaks.
Fear is a thief of motion. It wins not by persuasion, but by paralysis. It whispers in our ear that stillness is safety, that silence protects. It makes cowards feel wise, inaction feel reasonable, retreat feel like strategy. So nothing moves. The moment passes, and passes again.
1/ People who believe Nicole Good was "in the wrong" for trying to drive away from a federal officer are telling us something important about themselves: they value compliance over justice.
That mindset isn’t just misguided. It’s fundamentally un-American. I can explain. 🧵👇
2/ America’s founding story wasn’t about obeying the rules, it was about challenging unjust ones. The Boston Tea Party and civil rights marches are examples of acts of defiance against oppressive power structures.
Justice has always preceded legality in our moral code.
3/ When you prioritize "following the rules" at all costs, you’re effectively saying power defines what’s right. But history shows the opposite: power often needs to be confronted to make things right.
Look, man. I was deployed to Iraq 2003-2004. Our unit leadership would provide us highly specific instructions on the Rules of Engagement for any given mission. If we were stepping outside the wire, there was a standing RoE, and we were briefed pre-mission. We knew to obey it.
My point is this: Yes, if you add a bunch of less-trained people to the force, there will be mistakes.
I believe this to be a convenient excuse which obscures reality which fails to account for the sheer number of violent incidents we are observing on American streets.
As an 18 year old brand new, freshly-minted Private, my unit could still trust me; and I could pretty much trust everyone in my unit not to violate the RoE. We had a notion of the consequences, and bloodthirst was not encouraged.
FACT: Sanctions are the most important method of global financial moderation to help keep us safe from the world's worst terrorists.
This key defensive tool is now converted to a weapon of state repression and censorship by Trump admin under false guise of defending free speech.
We're not just talking the regular ol' domestic state repression, either.
The sanctions list has just become a global cleaver to financially terminate Trump's political enemies who are not U.S. citizens nor residents. He seeks to antagonize his targets and send a public message.
The clear message being broadcasted is that opposing Trump or engaging in advocacy which runs counter to the ideology this administration is installing in the U.S. is likely to result in significant consequences.
The admin repeats this message of fear via every channel, daily.