Today we had a meeting of @RenewEurope to discuss Ukraine. I share here a few proposals on #EconomicWarfare I prepared for the Group to discuss (link at end).
Given the failure of Putin´s initial plans, tough economic sanctions are crucial NOW.
Starting point: this is warfare, even if economic-- thus we, the EU countries (and US!), will need to incur serious costs. No free lunch.
My view is that there we must act on 4 axis:
- Swift
- Central Bank Assets
- Oligarchs money
- Energy: Zero-gas
2/12
First: SWIFT, paired with several other measures, including blocking alternative payment systems linked to bank accounts, and blocking access of all banks to the financial system (more on energy later!).
Painful to Putin: EXTREMELY
Painful to us: VERY
3/12
Second, cut off Russian Central Bank, block its assets abroad.
Putin has done a huge effort diversifying away from US Dollars etc but there is a huge amount (10% is 60 bn in Europe) to seize just in EU, probably GER.
Painful to Putin: Very
Painful to us: Little (short run)
4/12
Third: @gabriel_zucman@PikettyLeMonde confiscatory tax on assets of oligarchs.
Their two key insights
- Wealth in Russian is extremely concentrated
- It is held offshore in extremely high proportion
5/12
So how to do it? Zucman, in personal commmunication proposes a tax (left slide). PIketty in blog too. Legally, sounds dubious.
So here is a new idea. Everyone linked to this war of aggression is a war criminal. A lot of regime honchos seen on TV supporting aggression.
6/12
This has never been done, but there is no reason why it cannot be done- e.g. there is space for this in the Guideliness of the Council.
Painful to Putin: Hugely
Painful to us: Not at all
7/12
Final idea: Zero-gas.
Starting point here is that we are subsidizing this war.
WE, the EU citizens are the evil people givin Putin the cash for this crazy advanture.
8/12
We can survive 0-gas.
Winter is almost over, we have huge LNG surplus capacity, we need to bring back nuclear and other closed plants (yes, thermal plants) but we can do it.
WE CANNOT CONTINUE PAYING FOR THE WAR EFFORT OF PUTIN!
9/12
One caveat: this shock is very asmmetric. Different countries incur very different costs. Thus Europe needs to absorb the cost of this policy with a new facility modeled after NextGEn.
Like Covid, we are facing a one off, massive supply shock. Europe needs to absorbe it.
10/12
Conclusions:
Do it all
Do it hard
Do it now
11/12
I know it is a pain to read slides like this.
Here is a link to the full PDF . I hope it can stimulate a good discussion
12/12 dropbox.com/s/0g599p297cbu…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵While Brussels dreams up new billion-euro funds, businesses suffocate under red tape. Draghi's report maps our regulatory labyrinth, yet prescribes more debt as the cure. France now pays higher rates than Greece. Here's the story.
(From my Silicon Continent post today)
1/10
Over the last decade, we've witnessed an unprecedented debt explosion. Just energy crisis measures cost €651bn in 16 months.
Yet EU growth remains anemic. Our supposedly "neoliberal" era has paradoxically increased business regulations and constraints. siliconcontinent.com/p/focus-on-the…
The alternative can be seen in the countries forced to reform during the euro crisis. Greece, Ireland, Portugal, and Cyprus have outperformed the eurozone in growth and job creation for a decade. Not from debt - from structural reform.
1/10 Europe just got a brutal wake-up call about green energy math. When wind & sun disappeared in December, electricity prices shot up 20X. Our current plans for batteries and storage won't solve this for decades. Here's the real numbers 🧵
2/10 Case in point: December 2023's "dunkelflaute" in Europe. No wind, no sun. Result? Electricity prices spiked 20x in Norway, hit record highs in Netherlands, and led Spain's authorities to cut power to factories 🌑
Link to the post by @pietergaricano
3/10 People confuse power (GW) with energy (GWh). A 1GW battery might sound as good as a 1GW nuclear plant. But batteries run for hours, nuclear runs forever. During a 4-day "dark doldrums," that nuclear plant makes 96GWh - while your battery is long dead.
The ECB is handicapping its digital euro project (strict holding limits, no interest payments, and mandatory bank account links) in order to protect the current broken, inefficient, subsidized banking system.
Do we need banks?
My post today in Silicon Continent
🧵
The ECB wants to give Europeans direct central bank accounts for payments. Their goal? Compete with Bitcoin and lower transaction costs by cutting out Visa/Mastercard fees. Sounds great... until you see the restrictions.
2/10 siliconcontinent.com/p/do-we-need-b…
They impose these restrictions to avoid financial instability (warning: usually this expression means a banker wants to pick your pocket).
Why protect banks when they're becoming obsolete? Non-bank players now handle mortgages, payments, corporate credit, etc.
3/10
Europe had an effective tool for climate action: the Emissions Trading System (ETS). Instead of expanding this market-based solution, we've built a byzantine regulatory framework that goes far beyond emissions reduction.
THREAD on my post today on the "Compliance Doom Loop"
1/10
Costs are staggering: Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) requires 42,000 companies report 1,052 data points (783 mandatory). Cost: €150K-1M per company annually.
CSRD compliance costs of 12.5% of investment of mid sized firms (EIB).
Danish firms face 63% more regulations in 2023 vs 2001. Chemical industry SME compliance costs nearly doubled: €332.5K (2014) to €577K (2023). Add GDPR: €500K-10M more. 3/
Wake-up Europe! Enough of the de-growth agenda!
There is no strategic autonomy while we spend our every waking hour erecting barriers to growth!
THREAD on the post today in Silicon Continent by @pietergaricano.
1/8
Today's Trump victory makes Europe's strategic autonomy urgent. But Europe has lived beyond its means through "luxury rules" - virtuous but growth-hurting policies that were only possible due to US protection and innovation. 2/ siliconcontinent.com/p/the-end-of-l…
Luxury rules are laws that make our privileged societies feel good but harm competitiveness. Like Germany closing nuclear plants in 2011, increasing reliance on imported gas, or the EU's GDPR hurting tech innovation.
3/
The EU AI Act seems designed to allow AI only for routine tasks while hindering its use in high-level problem-solving.
This will endanger European AI startups and significantly damage EU productivity.
THREAD on our post today in Silicon Continent. 1/9
An AI bank teller in the EU would need two humans to oversee it. A startup building an AI tutor faces countless hurdles before launching. The is the reality under the EU AI Act—a well-meaning but flawed attempt to regulate AI. 2/ siliconcontinent.com/p/the-strange-…
The Act classifies AI systems by risk: unacceptable, high, limited, and minimal. Unacceptable systems, like social scoring or workplace emotion recognition, are banned.
Fines can reach €15 million or 3% of global revenue.
3/