War Propaganda About Ukraine Becoming More Militaristic, Authoritarian, and Reckless

greenwald.substack.com/p/war-propagan…
Every useful or pleasing claim about the war, no matter how unverified or subsequently debunked, rapidly spreads, including by US news outlets, while dissenters are vilified as traitors or Kremlin agents.

No matter your views, having falsehoods ratified is dangerous and harmful. Image
Even if you're certain you have apprehended the moral dimensions of this conflict, that only takes you so far - as was true of 9/11 or Saddam. Especially with calls for no-fly zones, regime change and "crippling" sanctions, vital debates remain, which require space to question. ImageImage
All humans are susceptible to propaganda. It's most potent when about war, and when -- as now -- the societal consensus is close to absolute. It's vital to hear, to seek out, alternative ways of thinking. I highly recommend this analysis by @fbfsubstack:

niccolo.substack.com/p/fuck-it-russ…
I realized during Russiagate: history repeats itself because so many who didn't live through it don't know what happened. After 9/11, every dissenter was called a traitor. @davidfrum & @Liz_Cheney built their career on this. Exactly what's happening now, but so many don't know.👇 ImageImageImageImage
A huge portion of the viral stories that people spent the first week mindlessly passing around -- many of which ended up ratified in major media outlets -- either had no evidence, reason to believe they were false, or were debunked. Again, no matter your views, this is dangerous: ImageImageImage
Here's a good thread that, with evidence, shows that so many of the most shared and viral stories either lacked any evidence, were of doubtful veracity, or were outright false. This account has been very balanced, skeptical and cautious in its analysis:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

Mar 1
Frum's career was built on smearing those who disagree with him as being traitors and on the Enemy's side. From Bush's "you're with us or with the terrorists" speech to Frum's 2003 article "Unpatriotic Conservatives" (about Iraq War opponents), it's his specialty. Won't stop now.
Everyone "now has a decision to make: Either you are with us or you are with the" Russians. ImageImage
He's now regarded in many media sectors and establishment liberal politics as the Conscience of the Nation. One key benefit of constantly locating new Hitlers (from Trump to Putin) is that it erases all prior sins, bestows elites with total absolution:

Read 4 tweets
Feb 28
Given all the various claims about what "real leftists" must say and think about Russia/Ukraine, it's worth hearing this two-part answer from Noam Chomsky from February 13, when asked about rising tensions over Ukraine between Moscow and NATO:
The 2nd part. One of the most bizarre claims is now is that his view -- that NATO expansion is genuinely threatening to all Russians, not just Putin -- is some Kremlin propaganda invented last week when, in fact, it's what US officials and scholars have been saying for years.
Here's @PeterBeinart documenting how top US security officials, including the current CIA Director, have been warning for years: NATO expansion will provoke Russian action in Ukraine. You don't have agree, but don't pretend it's some new invention of RT:

peterbeinart.substack.com/p/bidens-cia-d…
Read 5 tweets
Feb 27
🤣

In case you doubt that anyone who deviates from the mandated consensus instantly gets smeared as a Russian agent or apologist. The DSA statement was reasonable (see below); its crime was that it criticized NATO. Hence it must be "pro-Putin." The WH also attacked DSA.
Here's the @DemSocialists statement. I'm sure many would disagree with some of these claims but it's perfectly reasonable, and if you can't express this minimal dissent without being smeared by top Democrats and the WH as a Kremlin agent, then the climate is toxic and warped.
And again, just to illustrate how much more open and permissive the debate over Ukraine is around the world, here's one of Brazil's most influential YouTubers and commentators, @felipeneto, asking a question which, in the US, would prompt instant "pro-Putin" accusations:
Read 4 tweets
Feb 27
It's impossible to overstate how extreme this has been, worsening daily. Largely due to social media, the level of lockstep messaging and reckless affirming of disinformation is worse now than even after 9/11. Zero attempt to identify pleasing assertions as false, by design.👇
It's indifference over false stories spreading as long as they advance the right side: The Noble Lies. That's how a propagandistic government (and neocons) think, not how journalists or citizens should. Even if you're certain of your moral views, nobody should want to be mislead.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 25
In the US, "the left" means Bernie/AOC. But so often, they're far from the left internationally -- as we see with Corbyn & Mélenchon's opposition to vaccine mandates, or you'll see if you ask Bolivia/Cuba/Venezuela/Ecuador/Lula what they think of Russia, and now with Ukraine:
Here's Varoufakis -- the leftist former Finance Minister of Greece and current member of Parliament -- elaborating on his view that the US should provide Russia its vow never to put Ukraine in NATO or militarily defend Ukraine in exchange for Russia withdrawing its troops:
And here's Varoufakis arguing that the "rules-based international order" wasn't destroyed by Russia's invasion of Ukraine (which he condemns) but by the US attack on Iraq and NATO/Clinton's bombing of Yugoslavia with no UN permission, among many other prior lawless Western acts:
Read 15 tweets
Feb 24
At noon EST today, I'll be live on Rumble discussing the war in Ukraine and the debate over what role the U.S. Government should play, if any, in its outcome.

rumble.com/vvrd3t-the-war…
Whenever war breaks out, emotions are extremely high, as are nationalism and tribalism. Especially at the start, there typically is lockstep unity among political/media elites. There's thus no point in using social media to do anything but read from that script. Chomsky on TV:
Here's the second part where Chomsky -- 30 years ago -- explained why the constricting structure of television (requiring "concision": the demand to make all points in 5 minutes between commercials) precludes conventional wisdom from being challenged. Social media is even worse:
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(