Crucial analysis by @RonBrownstein: The country is turning into a dysfunctional pseudo-democratic system nationally – and on the state level will be divided into democracy in one half of the states and authoritarian one-party rule in the other.
Put differently, America will be divided into a multiracial, pluralistic “blue” part that accepts the country’s changing social, cultural, and demographic realities vs. a white Christian nationalist “red” part that is led by people entirely devoted to rolling back those changes.
From a liberal, blue-state perspective, it might be tempting to say: Well, let them! Let them ruin those states and turn them into reactionary backwaters! But that would be disastrous, and not just for the white Christian nationalists who are assaulting democracy.
Remember that the “blue states vs. red states” narrative too often obscures the fact that America’s political geography is actually mostly shaped by an urban vs. rural divide. What are we telling the people who live in blue urban centers in the midst of red states: Tough luck?
“Well, they’ll have to vote with their feet and move!” I’m sure a lot of young people, especially, will do exactly that. But it leaves those behind who aren’t able to uproot their entire existence – often precisely the people who will suffer most from white reactionary politics.
Even if, somehow, everyone who prefers multiracial, pluralistic democracy were to get out of these “red” states, leaving behind only those conservative white Christians who desire to be surrounded by people who reflect their own image back at them, it would still be a disaster.
In any realistic scenario, due to a combination of the current system’s anti-majoritarian distortions and the GOP’s many aggressive anti-democratic initiatives, Republicans are basically guaranteed enough power to obstruct and prevent functional Democratic governance.
On the national level, Democrats might still have a decent chance to win the popular vote by enough that it actually translates into an electoral college majority. But as we are seeing right now, that’s not nearly enough to stop America’s accelerating slide into authoritarianism.
Ideally, the Supreme Court would step in and put a stop to the escalating attempts to roll back civil rights protections on the state level. But the conservative majority on the Court is actually doing the opposite, providing robust cover for the reactionary counter-mobilization.
We are left with a situation in which Republican-led states undermine democracy and entrench white reactionary rule, with or without the support of a majority of voters; the Supreme Court says: Keep going! And Republicans in Congress block any national counter-legislation.
Just as @RonBrownstein emphasizes, this would actually constitute a return to a constellation that defined American politics before the 1960s: An authoritarian movement entrenching white supremacy in a number of states while also shaping and/or obstructing national policy.
What’s different compared to previous eras in U.S. history, however, is that the idea of America as a nation of and for white Christians, the ideology of white Christian superiority, now clearly lacks majority support – entrenching it is an authoritarian minority-rule project.
That also means that the current situation is unsustainable. Some form of stability can only be achieved by either overcoming reactionary minority rule - or through ever more authoritarian measures and increasingly violent oppression.
The fact that a shrinking minority of white conservatives is consistently being enabled to hold on to power against the will of the majority of voters is destined to cause a massive legitimacy crisis. And unless the system is properly democratized, it is only going to get worse.
In a system that is supposedly a representative democracy, we are facing a rapidly worsening political crisis that will have to be resolved - one way or the other. Which way? We need to grapple honestly with the fact that, as of right now, that’s an open question.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is not some far-right internet troll, but a Republican state senator - and it’s impossible to adequately understand American politics without grappling in earnest with why her radicalism is widely seen as justified on the Right and within the GOP.
Every “Western” society harbors far-right extremists like Rogers who dream of committing acts of fascistic violence. But it’s the fact that the Republican Party embraces and elevates her, and others like her, that constitutes an acute danger to democracy.
Just ignoring this won’t work, because it’s not coming from some rightwing troll, but a Republican elected official who’s in good standing with the rest of her party. No use making fun of it either: These people are in positions of power, intent on using that power.
Now that the President has nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson, I’d like to re-post my column on why Biden’s pledge to send a Black woman to the Supreme Court was so significant - and why conservatives are so furious even though it won’t change the balance of power on the Court:
This captures precisely why conservatives feel threatened by this nomination: They understand it symbolizes the recognition that having white men dominate the powerful institutions of American life is a problem that needs to be rectified.
Conservatives fear the acknowledgment that the country’s institutions should reflect the composition of the people; they understand that representation matters, that a Black woman ascending to a position like this is also an acknowledgment of past injustice.
Take note: Reactionaries and far-right movements across the “West” are siding with Putin. They see him as an ally in the struggle to uphold white Christian patriarchal rule – the kind of authoritarian strongman that can turn the tide against the forces of “woke” pluralism.
None of these rightwingers who are currently professing their sympathy for Putin know much about Russia or care about the specific causes and dynamics of what is going on in Ukraine. What matters to them is an imagined Russia: a stronghold of white patriarchal Christianity.
Putin understands that this is his appeal to Western reactionaries. Democracy is a real threat to him and his regime – not NATO, not Western military might. It is useful to him to be able to present himself as an ally in the fight against “wokeism” and for “traditional values.”
President Joe Biden likes to celebrate his friendship with Mitch McConnell, which is weirdly at odds with the political situation – but captures the stark asymmetry in the way the two sides treat each other quite precisely.
Republicans are engaged in an authoritarian assault on the political system, embrace extremists who fantasize about committing acts of violence against Democrats, and plan on finding a reason, any reason, to impeach Joe Biden as soon as they get the chance.
This is a key point. Every time I mention how the Right is embracing the threat of political violence against supposedly “Un-American” enemies, I get a flurry of “Where were you when those woke barbarians destroyed our cities?! The violence is coming from the Left!!!” replies.
This has become dogma on the Right: That the country is facing an onslaught from a radically “Un-American,” extremist “Left” that is violently threatening to destroy everything the nation is supposed to stand for. And that the Democratic Party has been taken over by those forces.
That’s how they’re giving themselves permission to embrace whatever radical measures are deemed necessary to defeat this “Un-American” enemy. If the nation is under acute threat, nothing is beyond the pale to defend it. Democracy? The rule of law? Who cares!
I mean, politics aside, this is quite bizarre. There is absolutely no evidence presented here. None. A purely ideological statement, masquerading as “journalism.”
I don’t disagree with this - it captures the pathologies of access journalism precisely. I do think, however, that we shouldn’t focus solely on the opportunistic nature, as ideology always defines the limits of opportunism. The person who wrote this piece can’t be fully agnostic.
This, exactly - and these centrists receive active support from journalists who are fully on board with the project of fighting back against the “radical,” “woke” forces that have supposedly advanced too far in the Democratic Party in particular and American life in general.