When flow dyssynchrony occurs in VC modes, the first reaction is often to increase the flow rate. Reasonable… but it often fails! Why? Maybe because any fixed (or fixed decelerating) flow can have trouble matching the patient effort at all stages of inspiration. Example:
Here the flow starvation occurs in the latter part of the breath, not the start, creating a biphasic appearance to the flow curve. What if we simply increase the flow?
It’s no better! Now flow is probably too high at the start (initial flow overshoot as evidenced by the steep pressure spike)… but still inadequate at the end. Also, the pressure spike and resulting short I-time contributes to some double triggers.
Solution? Switch to a variable-flow mode, ie with a pressure limit (PC, PS). Flow now can change during the breath to match the curve of effort.

Start with increasing the flow in VC, but with significant effort, this is usually what you’ll need!

#medtwitter #ventrounds #FOAMcc

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Critical Concepts

Critical Concepts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @critconcepts

Mar 1
A patient suffers STEMI causing biventricular failure, including severe RV infarct. An Impella is placed, and they arrive in the ICU from the cath lab. You see the following. (This arterial line is functioning.)

What do you know about the hemodynamics? 🧵

#FOAMcc #medtwitter Image
In this case, the Impella is completely decompressing the LV and taking over its output. There is NO pulsatility to the arterial flow — only laminar flow from the Impella. Can you think of any implications of this for the immediate resuscitation?

#FOAMed #cardiotwitter
1. PULSE oximetry will not function. Absorption or reflection oximetry relies on detecting pulsatility to differentiate arterial blood from other blood and tissues (that’s why it gives you a pleth). You will need to rely on blood gases.
Read 9 tweets
Dec 9, 2021
Jonathan Dresner on sudden cardiac arrest among athletes: most common source sports #CCPRFSummit2021
UW offers free online modules to educate clinicians on performing ECG screening for athletes uwsportscardiology.org/e-academy/ecg-…
(Spelling correction: Drezner)
Read 9 tweets
Dec 8, 2021
Michae Levy on refractory VF: resuming immediate compressions after a defibrillation shock may in some cases induce refibrillation after initial (unnoticed) ROSC, due to the mechanical stimulus. #CCPRFSummit2021
Double sequential defibrillation may work, but just changing the vector (moving pads) may work as well.
“Refractory VF is rare. Recurrent VT is common.”
Read 5 tweets
Jan 31, 2021
Daniel Dante Yeh: In first 7 days of critical illness., hypocaloric (<70%) nutrition should be used, can advance to 80-100% after day 3. Use indirect calorimetry if you can. #CCC50
Use high-protein, hypocaloric feeding in obese patients to preserve lean mass while not overfeeding. If 30-50 BMI use 11-14 kcal/kg actual bodyweight, if BMI >50 use 22-25 kcal/kg of ideal bodyweight.
Generally use normal protein goals for kidney failure. If on CRRT, however, need to account for loss of aminos in the membrane, may be ~15-17%.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 31, 2021
John Teerlink: Cardiac calcitropes (catecholamines, PDE3 inhibitors) increase contractility, ischemia, arrhythmias, mortality. We use them anyway because it's what we've got. #CCC50
OPTIME-CHF: Milrinone for CHF exacerbation when NOT requiring inotropes. No clinical benefit but trend for more MI/death and significant increase in arrhythmias and hypotension.
OptimaCC: epi vs norepi in cardiogenic shock in MI: no difference in change in cardiac index, but discontinued for harm in epi group (tachycardia and increase in refractory shock). So maybe use norepi?
Read 5 tweets
Jan 31, 2021
Xavier Monnet: CNPN doesn't work for fluid responsiveness because it ignores the shape of the Starling curve, which varies by patient. You can't get the intersection of two lines if you don't know one of them. #CCC50
"Mini" fluid challenge (100-150ml) avoids as much overload if it proves negative, but requires very sensitive markers of cardiac output. Maybe pulse counter analysis...
PPV, SVV Uses the respiratory cycle as an intrinsic fluid challenge. Automatically measured by some bedside monitors. No good in arrhythmias, spontaneous breathing, low lung compliance or tidal volumes (eg ARDS), so only works out in about 20% of ICU patients.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(