Why wouldn’t he use nukes, she argues. He’s already used polonium. He’s already used novichok. Why wouldn’t he reach back into his arsenal of extreme weird inhumane banned weaponry?
Hill is such a sober, rational, careful figure. Anyone who saw her evidence to Congress knows how impressive she is. She’s saying the world has to get its shit together & act collectively now because this is 1939. He is Hitler. And he’s not going to stop at Ukraine
Sanctions are not enough. That’s her clear message. There has to be a global response. Anyone who is currently doing any sort of business is complicit, she says. All business activity must be halted immediately
‘In the UK, there was a whole host of British politicians who admired Hitler’s strength & power…
‘Unfortunately we have politicians & public figures in US & Europe who have embraced idea Putin was wronged by NATO’
Trump, Carlson, Banks, Farage, Lord Haw Haws all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, do I have this straight? The best known oligarch in Britain & billionaire owner of Chelsea FC who tried to sue investigative journalist @CatherineBelton for writing about his close relationship with Vladimir Putin..he *still* hasn’t been sanctioned?
Unbelievable. Even for Britain. Boris Johnson, who says he’s doing everything humanly possible in this unprecedented crisis, has given him a head start to let him liquidate his assets first?
Could Johnson be an even bigger hypocrite? Yes. The man who suppressed the Russia report, is rolling in Russian cash & has failed to sanction Abramovich is using Putin’s invasion of Ukraine to put out jingoistic films portraying himself as hero of the hour
I think we may look back on this as the first Great Information War. Except we're already 8 years in.
The first Great Information War began in 2014. The invasion of Ukraine is the latest front. And the idea it doesn't already involve us is fiction, a lie.
1/
It was Putin's fury at the removal of President Yankovych in Feb 2014 that kicked everything off. Information operations were first crucial step in invasion of Crimea & Donbass. A deliberate attempt to warp reality to confuse both Ukrainians & the world.
2/
This was not new. The Soviets had practiced "dezinformatsiya" for years. But what was new in 2014 was technology. Social media. It was a transformative moment. "Hybrid warfare" on steroids: a golden Willy Wonka ticket to manipulate hearts & minds. Almost completely invisibly.
3/
This is the full fascism propaganda film they put out. But given chechens’ rep as fearsome killers, I hope Ukrainians will take heart from fact there’s no way Kadyrov will want to get those £1,250 boots dirty
At the time, my trial felt extreme & brutal & terrifying. My career, reputation, livelihood on line. One day on from Russia invading Ukraine, it feels like mad surreal dream. Did a pro-Putin apologist really get to put me on trial at high court for reporting on his Russian links?
It’s a test case for the public interest defence & it’ll (further) fuck journalism in this country & what we can safely report. But it’s so utterly utterly absurd that it came to this, that I can’t bring myself to care any more what happens to me.
Amazing & honestly fascinating that not a single mainstream outlet other than @guardian covered it. Fresh evidence of Banks’s links to Russia & UK govt’s complicity in covering them up came out in trial & went entirely unreported.
I wrote this in Nov 2017. Days after FBI revealed multiple strands of Trump-Russia investigation ran through London & I pulled them apart further. It was also when the attacks against me began in earnest. From Cambridge Analytica, LeaveEU & Russian govt 1/ theguardian.com/politics/2017/…
Nov 17 is when it all suddenly got real. That first FBI indictment revealed it was unpicking a whole web of relationships between the Trump campaign & Kremlin. To people who not only had contacts in the UK. But with actual ministers in the govt. 2/
The govt refused to answer any questions about its own ministers connections to figures FBI was investigating. One week previously, Johnson was asked if he'd seen any sign of foreign interference. "Nyet," he said. There are multiple reasons that we know this can't be true. 3/
The best way we can support Ukrainians is to support @ZelenskyyUa’s demands for tougher sanctions. It is utterly immoral that @boris_johnson is refusing to take action against oligarchs we know are close to the Kremlin & who call London their home