Stephen Miles Profile picture
Mar 1 8 tweets 2 min read
A few quick thoughts on no fly zones (NFZ). Just to be clear, no fly zones don't just happen, they're declared and then must be enforced. In this case, enforcing a NFZ over Ukraine would mean shooting down Russian military planes that refused to comply. 1/
There is zero reason to believe that Russian military aircraft would comply, which means someone has to shoot them down. The Ukrainian military is already doing what they can to shoot them down, so you're talking about outside intervention. In this case, presumably US or NATO. 2/
So now you're talking about US and/or NATO partners shooting Russian jets and bombers out of the sky. Which means you're talking about direct US/NATO military engagement with Russia. Russia will fight back. So then what? 3/
This is where people get tripped up. Even if you presume that the US and NATO possess superior capabilities (which isn't an unreasonable assumption), you're looking at the likely expansion of war to a number of different countries. And that's just conventional fighting. 4/
The logical and obvious reality is that such a conflict would escalate to the use of nuclear weapons. And now Russia and the United States are shooting nuclear weapons at one another and within a few hours millions are dead. Before long most all of humanity. 5/
Is this the only outcome? No. It's possible something intervenes, someone blinks, someone accepts they're defeated and backs down. But you're rolling the dice on planetary distinction, which would also kill the people you were intending to save with a no fly zone. 6/
This may sound hyperbolic, but it's really not. There's a reason that the United States and Russia (and the Soviet Union) have gone to great lengths to avoid fighting a direct war in the nuclear age. The chances of this are all too real, and require honest, sober reckoning. 7/7
A quick addendum in case it wasn't obvious. I want to live in a world in which a no fly zone was possible. I want to live in a world in which we genuinely have mechanisms to prevent atrocities that don't result in even worse atrocities. We should build that world. We need it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Miles

Stephen Miles Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SPMiles42

Feb 28
I’m truly baffled by the number of folks on this website who seem not to grasp that if you manage to temporarily avert a conventional attack only to then have everyone on the planet die in a nuclear war, you haven’t actually saved the lives you thought you were saving.
It’s not at all that I don’t understand the horror that these Russian convoys portend. I do. It is horrific and terrifying. But it’s also pure delusion to think that US military action to “take it out” would not quickly escalate towards nuclear war.
And before some folks come at me with nonsense about how we can do it without escalating, understand that the “analysts” telling you that are the very same ones who have told us forever we should prolong a nuclear arms race that is what put humanity in this position.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 26
There’s an emerging right wing narrative that somehow @POTUS energy policy is the real culprit on #Ukraine. It’s absurd but nonetheless having to refute absurdity is where we’re at in 2022, so let’s dig in. 🧵
The argument goes like this, Trump had a policy of “energy independence” and Biden is ending that which means that now since Russia exports oil and gas, we’re now strengthening them and Putin. Again, this is absurd in multiple ways. 2/
Let’s start with the fundamental truth that Trump’s energy policy was to double down on fossil fuels and undermine global efforts for a green transition. This isn’t “energy independence” it’s preservation of a global fossil fuel industry that empowers Russia. 3/
Read 13 tweets
Sep 18, 2021
I really shouldn't be shocked at the disingenuous lies by House Republicans anymore at this point, but here we are. This statement by HASC RM Rogers is a real doozy though, and it actually shows a lot about how things have gotten so f*ed up. So let's dig in. 🧵 Image
Let's start with Rogers claim at this airstrike was 'ordered by President Biden.' That is a lie & Rogers knows it. Here's the CENTCOM Cmdr confirming as much that same day. 2/ Image
Rogers knows how the launch authority for these strikes works and he knows @POTUS didn't personally order it. But he lied because it makes for a better political attack on Biden. He's lying about a military action to serve his political aims. That's beyond dangerous. 3/
Read 12 tweets
Sep 17, 2021
If you're a natsec analyst/commenter/purveyor of hot takes I'm asking today that you be careful about how you discuss the confirmation that the Kabul drone strike in fact only killed innocent victims. Quick thread.
It's important to be honest in our commentary that this kind of thing has been common throughout the entirety of America's drone wars. Commenting in this moment in ways that implies this was simply an unusual mistake risks creating a false narrative of this being unusual.
It's also important that we not erase other innocent civilians of drone strikes who happened to have been killed in a strike where we did in fact hit a known target, but nonetheless killed numerous innocent bystanders. Their deaths are no less tragic.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 14, 2021
.@POTUS just finished his remarks laying out his plans for a complete drawdown of the US war in Afghanistan. I'll link to the full text once it's live, but I think it's REALLY important for progressives and anti-war advocates to show up in this moment. Let me explain why. 🧵
First, let's start with the obvious. @POTUS is doing what many, many of us have LONG called for. Yes, details matter. Yes, he's also doing a LOT we disagree with. And yes, this all should have happened a decade ago. But he's also still doing what we've called for. 2/
More often than not, we're in the business of pressuring, pushing, and calling out when the President isn't doing what we want. And trust me, I'll be back to that very, very shortly. But right now, he's doing what we want and we should recognize that and applaud it. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Aug 18, 2020
A disappointing whitewash from the @DoD_IG as their report on Trump's abuse of active duty military personnel at the southern border came out today. A few thoughts on context and what comes next. <thread>
For starters, you can read the full report here: dodig.mil/reports.html/A… 2/
This report came in response to tens of thousands of activists and 34 Members of Congress demanding the DoD IG look into possible violations of posse comitatus when Trump deployed active duty troops to the border. winwithoutwar.org/progressives-u… 3/
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(