Thread by @cryptodanvans

Couple things around #SUPERFLUID staking so people understand👍🏻🧪
And if this makes sense😌

You can only bond half of the $osmo in your $osmo half of the pool atm.
While only using 1 validator for it.

It shows 19% apr added onto the 75% pool apr here’s why🤝

1/6
#OSMOSIS

The apr % you see is for the full value of your pool..

So to get to these numbers
If you have 100% superfluid staking on the osmo half of the pool but the %apr shows for the full value of the pool the apr would be around 38% half of the 76%staking apr.

2/6

So when calculating etc you can use the 38% for the full value you have in the pool.

So to get to 19% again its a matter of halving the 38% to 19% (because only half the $osmo is fluidstaking) then to calculate what you get you add 19% to the overall value of the pool

3/6

So atm you are getting full staking rewards from superfluid staking but you are only getting it for the equivalent of 25% of the full pool value hence why 19% is the correct apr but just accounting for the whole pool value.

Sounds easier in my head trying to explain 🤣

4/6

The reason it is 14 day bond would be to be on par with stake bonding periods. it wouldn’t make sense to incentivise fluid staking on any others as staking secures the network.

GOV will play a part over time with proposals to add superfluid staking to pools

5/6

So going forward you will see more pools with superfluid staking plus you will be able to stake the full $osmo half of the pool soon.

Also here’s the basics to #superfluid staking if you don’t already know medium.com/@d.j.evansbogn…

6/6