Tom Pollard Profile picture
Mar 3, 2022 10 tweets 6 min read Read on X
I've been interviewing people using #FoodBanks about the circumstances that have led them there & the impact on their #MentalHealth

In a new @IFAN_UK & @jrf_uk report, out today & covered by @BigIssue, I describe what I heard - here are the headlines 🧵 bigissue.com/news/social-ju…
Everyone I spoke to described experiencing some feelings of shame & embarrassment about using a food bank, particularly on their first visit. Many had put off seeking support that they desperately needed because of the stigma associated with poverty & accessing food aid. 2/10
People’s circumstances were complex & personal but the underlying reason for needing food aid was simple & universal: their income (primarily from benefits but sometimes from wages too) was inadequate to make ends meet, particularly after the £20-a-week #UniversalCredit cut. 3/10
With fuel & food prices increasing, there was a growing gulf between the income people were receiving & the cost of meeting their basic needs. This situation is only going to get worse - inflation is set to exceed 7% in April but benefits will only be uprated by 3.1%. 4/10
Everyone I spoke to wanted to be in work, & ideally earning enough to not need benefits, but many faced additional barriers such as health issues or caring responsibilities. Even those who were able to find work reported that it was poorly paid, insecure & unpredictable. 5/10
The challenge of living on an inadequate income was compounded by other issues people were experiencing, such as poor quality housing, outstanding debts (often to the DWP), & problems with the benefits system. These issues were causing people a huge amount of stress & worry. 6/10
The pressure & constant sense of struggle people were experiencing left them with little energy or 'headspace' to think much beyond the day-to-day challenges of making ends meet. People felt trapped in their current circumstances & often had little optimism about the future. 7/10
Having to endure sustained adversity & stress was taking an inevitable psychological toll on everyone I spoke to. Even when people didn't necessarily see themselves as having mental health problems, they often described issues that were suggestive of poor mental health. 8/10
Others spoke explicitly about experiencing anxiety & depression & suggested these issues had been directly caused or exacerbated by their difficult circumstances. Some people described having felt suicidal at times, as a direct consequence of the challenges they were facing. 9/10
Please do take a look at the full report & share it with others.

Huge thanks to everyone I interviewed, the food banks that hosted me (@EarlsfieldFood2 in South London & @TheCommunityCu1 in Kent), & to @IFAN_UK & @jrf_uk for supporting the research. 10/10
foodaidnetwork.org.uk/blog/mental-he…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Pollard

Tom Pollard Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PollardTom

Nov 23, 2023
It's understandable, given that I think the Government has wilfully blurred the lines, but there's been some misreading of what yesterday's announcements will mean for ill & disabled people so I thought it was worth offering my interpretation of where things stand... 🧵
The key announcement was planned changes to the criteria for the Work Capability Assessment (WCA), to kick in from 2025, meaning fewer people with mobility issues & mental health problems will be declared to have 'limited capability for work related activity' (LCWRA) [2/10]
People in this group get an additional £390 a month & are exempt from conditionality. Many people will instead be placed in the 'limited capability for work' (LCW) group, where they would lose this additional payment & be required to 'prepare for' but not apply for work [3/10]
Read 10 tweets
Jul 18, 2023
Beyond the nastiness & terrible impact of the two child limit itself (& therefore the disappointment that it may be around even longer), I think there are three deeper reasons why Labour's position has caused so much concern among those working on poverty & social security...🧵
Firstly, the two child limit was seen by many as 'low hanging fruit' in the social security space - one of a the changes that would be quick & easy to act on for a new Labour government, with a relatively low price tag but a guaranteed significant impact on (child) poverty 2/9
I think the fear now is that there may be little prospect of larger reforms in the social security space, such as addressing the fundamental inadequacy of unemployment benefit rates, if something like scrapping the two child limit is seen as too expensive & politically risky 3/9
Read 9 tweets
Mar 15, 2023
Here's a thread of my initial thoughts & reflections on the government's proposed reforms to disability benefits & employment support

Having worked on these issues for 15 odd years, including 18 months at DWP, I'm starting from a position of scepticism!🧵
gov.uk/government/pub…
I'm focusing on the big structural changes to the system floated in the white paper

One positive is that these are framed as 'transforming the system for the future' & the paper suggests that the changes wouldn't be introduced until 2026/27 (i.e. after the next election) 2/12
As trailed earlier in the week, they are proposing scrapping the WCA, on the basis that it causes a lot of stress (which is definitely true) & places people into benefit groups that, they believe, disincentivise work (which I think is a massive over-simplification) 3/12
Read 12 tweets
Aug 23, 2022
We now have the highest rate of economic inactivity due to long-term health issues for over 20yrs - almost 2.4m people

This is increasingly due to #MentalHealth, something I spent 18 frustrating months advising the DWP on a few years ago

Here's where things are going wrong...🧵
First of all, there are a whole range of factors causing more people to struggle with their mental health:
-poverty & inequality
-poor living conditions
-loneliness & isolation
-the impact of the pandemic
-stressful & insecure work
-difficulty accessing mental health support
2/11
These issues need to be tackled through concerted action across national & local government, services & communities

However, the DWP has a key role to play in providing financial support to people who are struggling & (for now) trying to help people back into employment 3/11
Read 11 tweets
Feb 22, 2022
Behind each of these overturned decisions is a person enduring months of uncertainty, anxiety & insufficient income. People often feel invalidated & even question their own disability. Their #MentalHealth suffers, sometimes to the point of feeling suicidal independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
Other services, particularly NHS #MentalHealth services, often have to step in to both support someone through the process of challenging a decision & to respond to the psychological fallout of the stress this situation causes. This puts a further strain on public finances
A process to ration resources between people is always likely to leave some feeling unfairly treated, but there is so much space for improvement within the current system. Social security should be seen as an investment in people rather than just a cost to be minimised
Read 5 tweets
Jun 30, 2020
Reflecting on #DWP's mindless return to conditionality & sanctions (despite it being a totally inappropriate response at this time & an ineffective & often counter-productive approach for many people) got me thinking about policy driven by a misplaced sense of morality 1/10
The assumption behind conditionality & sanctions is that people need the threat of losing their benefits to motivate them to find work. This is implicitly justified on the basis that people are getting something from the state & so have a moral duty to do something in return 2/10
Similar morality narratives shape (& are used to justify) policy around drugs and alcohol, homelessness, immigration &, most obviously, the criminal justice system. But the associated approaches of reward & punishment tend to be pretty ineffective in terms of outcomes 3/10
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(