Tom Pollard Profile picture
Mar 3, 2022 10 tweets 6 min read Read on X
I've been interviewing people using #FoodBanks about the circumstances that have led them there & the impact on their #MentalHealth

In a new @IFAN_UK & @jrf_uk report, out today & covered by @BigIssue, I describe what I heard - here are the headlines 🧵 bigissue.com/news/social-ju…
Everyone I spoke to described experiencing some feelings of shame & embarrassment about using a food bank, particularly on their first visit. Many had put off seeking support that they desperately needed because of the stigma associated with poverty & accessing food aid. 2/10
People’s circumstances were complex & personal but the underlying reason for needing food aid was simple & universal: their income (primarily from benefits but sometimes from wages too) was inadequate to make ends meet, particularly after the £20-a-week #UniversalCredit cut. 3/10
With fuel & food prices increasing, there was a growing gulf between the income people were receiving & the cost of meeting their basic needs. This situation is only going to get worse - inflation is set to exceed 7% in April but benefits will only be uprated by 3.1%. 4/10
Everyone I spoke to wanted to be in work, & ideally earning enough to not need benefits, but many faced additional barriers such as health issues or caring responsibilities. Even those who were able to find work reported that it was poorly paid, insecure & unpredictable. 5/10
The challenge of living on an inadequate income was compounded by other issues people were experiencing, such as poor quality housing, outstanding debts (often to the DWP), & problems with the benefits system. These issues were causing people a huge amount of stress & worry. 6/10
The pressure & constant sense of struggle people were experiencing left them with little energy or 'headspace' to think much beyond the day-to-day challenges of making ends meet. People felt trapped in their current circumstances & often had little optimism about the future. 7/10
Having to endure sustained adversity & stress was taking an inevitable psychological toll on everyone I spoke to. Even when people didn't necessarily see themselves as having mental health problems, they often described issues that were suggestive of poor mental health. 8/10
Others spoke explicitly about experiencing anxiety & depression & suggested these issues had been directly caused or exacerbated by their difficult circumstances. Some people described having felt suicidal at times, as a direct consequence of the challenges they were facing. 9/10
Please do take a look at the full report & share it with others.

Huge thanks to everyone I interviewed, the food banks that hosted me (@EarlsfieldFood2 in South London & @TheCommunityCu1 in Kent), & to @IFAN_UK & @jrf_uk for supporting the research. 10/10
foodaidnetwork.org.uk/blog/mental-he…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Pollard

Tom Pollard Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PollardTom

Mar 31
There was rightly concern last week when OBR & DWP documents revealed that £4.8bn of cuts to benefits for ill & disabled people would push 250k people into poverty, including 50k children

But @NEF analysis suggests the true scale & impact of these cuts will be even greater... 🧵 Image of newspaper frontpages from last week reporting on the scale and impact of benefit cuts for ill and disabled people
The headline figures take the cuts to PIP & the UC health top-up but offset these against a decision not to proceed with changes to the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) proposed by the previous government & pencilled in, but never fully confirmed, by this government 2/8
These changes were already in doubt after the High Court had ruled the previous government's consultation unlawful

The recent Green Paper announced that the WCA would be scrapped altogether in 2028 & these changes would not proceed in the interim 3/8 bigissue.com/news/social-ju…
Read 8 tweets
Mar 25
This clip encapsulates the dishonesty at the heart of the government's benefits announcements last week

Ill & disabled people should be offered more support to return to work, but doing so is in no way contingent on cutting their benefits or imposing conditionality... 🧵
If people are judged by DWP to have 'limited capability for work related activity', they get the UC health top up payment & (currently) cannot be mandated to undertake activities under the threat of sanction

But they absolutely can be offered voluntary employment support /2
Historically, DWP has done very little to try to proactively engage with this group, but that has been a choice rather than an inherent feature of the system

When DWP has put more effort into fostering voluntary engagement with support, the results have been promising /3
Read 10 tweets
Mar 20
The government's '£5bn of savings' figure is being widely taken as the scale of benefit cuts for ill & disabled people

But as @AnushkaAsthana revealed on @itvpeston last night, @NEF analysis shows the loss of income for this group is likely to be much greater than this... 🧵
From April 2026, existing recipients of the UC health top up will have this payment frozen, while the rate will be cut by £47-a-week for new claims

Based on figures from the IFS and DWP, we estimate this could equate to a total cut for this group of £1.48bn by 2029-30 (2/5) Chart showing the impact of a freeze on the UC health top up for existing recipients from 2026 (over £600m) and a cut for new recipients from 2026 (over £800m) and the total cut this equates to (£1.48bn)
BUT, we believe this cut is concealed by the government's '£5bn savings' figure, because the money it saves government will be recycled into spending on employment support & the basic rate of UC

That would mean a total cut in support for ill & disabled people of £6.5bn (3/5)
Read 5 tweets
Mar 15
Hi @DavidTWilcock. I just wanted to flag that your @MailOnline piece from Thursday is hugely misleading & seems to be based off a fundamental misunderstanding of the statistics

I'll explain why, then maybe you can retract the piece & issue an apology... 🧵1/6 Daily Mail online headline: The great benefit con? Just 14% of people claiming disability cash can actually PROVE they are too ill to work - as total getting handouts nears 2.5m
Here's the chart you use to justify the claim you're making. Putting aside the fact that you're giving a distorted picture of the rise in incapacity benefits by not including legacy benefits, the part of the chart labelled 'acceptable medical evidence' had me baffled at first 2/6 Chart showing the combination of people judged to have 'limited capability for work', 'limited capability for work/work-related activity' and those having 'Acceptable medical evidence'
I hadn't seen that term used in DWP statistics before, but when I looked on their system I realised that what you actually seemed to be referring to were the people who are presenting a GP's Fit Note while they wait to have their Work Capability Assessment 3/6 Screenshot of DWP statistics showing the number of people on Universal Credit who have been declared as having 'limited capability for work' (365,623), 'limited capability for work-related activity' (1,752,123), and 'Live fit note (Pre-WCA) (336,382)
Read 6 tweets
Mar 14
This, from a DWP press release yesterday (), is outrageous

In two short paragraphs it peddles multiple falsehoods about the current system that will be used to justify upcoming cuts & changes

Here's what MPs & journalists should be challenging... 🧵 gov.uk/government/new…Text from a DWP press release: In the current dysfunctional system, a person is placed in binary categories of either “fit for work” or “not fit for work” through the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) – an assessment the government has said it will either reform or replace, so it no longer drives people who want to work to a life on benefits.    Through this process, those not fit for work are told they have Limited Capability for Work Related Activity (LCWRA) – meaning they won’t receive employment support or further engagement from the system at any point following their assessment – effec...
First of all, people are not "placed in binary categories of either “fit for work” or “not fit for work”" - there is a middle category where people are expected to engage with employment support but not to apply for work - there's a reason DWP may want to gloss over this... /2
Despite people in this middle group receiving less money (just the basic rate of UC since 2017), being less unwell/disabled & having more 'conditionality' applied, their rate of returning to work hasn't been much higher than for those with higher benefits & no conditionality /3
Read 11 tweets
Nov 23, 2023
It's understandable, given that I think the Government has wilfully blurred the lines, but there's been some misreading of what yesterday's announcements will mean for ill & disabled people so I thought it was worth offering my interpretation of where things stand... 🧵
The key announcement was planned changes to the criteria for the Work Capability Assessment (WCA), to kick in from 2025, meaning fewer people with mobility issues & mental health problems will be declared to have 'limited capability for work related activity' (LCWRA) [2/10]
People in this group get an additional £390 a month & are exempt from conditionality. Many people will instead be placed in the 'limited capability for work' (LCW) group, where they would lose this additional payment & be required to 'prepare for' but not apply for work [3/10]
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(