Hans Mahncke Profile picture
Mar 4 5 tweets 1 min read
New Durham filing:

"The defendant [Sussmann] further claimed that these lookups demonstrated that Trump and/or his associates were using a type of Russian-made wireless phone in the vicinity of the White House and other locations."

Crackpot much?
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Durham raising a very good point about Joffe:

"[Joffe] had a history of providing assistance to the FBI...but decided in this instance to provide politically-charged allegations anonymously through the defendant and a law firm that was then-counsel to the Clinton Campaign"

Why?
"defendant claimed that he was not acting on behalf of any clients when, in fact, he hid his relationship with clients who harbored political and business interests tied to allegations against a then-Presidential candidate."

Durham revealing "business interests" is interesting.
More from Durham on the business angle:

"[Sussmann] chose to conceal from the FBI that he was acting as a paid advocate for clients with political and business agendas."

The most obvious interpretation is that Joffe went after Trump for political as well as business reasons.
"might have revealed further information about Tech Executive-1’s coordination with individuals tied to the Clinton Campaign"

Durham is careful with his words. Joffe *coordinating* with the Clinton campaign is juicy.

(btw Alfa's lawyers might want to revisit Joffe's deposition)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hans Mahncke

Hans Mahncke Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HansMahncke

Mar 4
"How top U.S. officials played key roles in destabilizing Ukraine and damaging U.S.-Russia relations"

New from @themarketswork and myself.

theepochtimes.com/before-russias…
2/ The deterioration relations with Russia started with President George W. Bush in 2008 when he dangled before Ukraine the promise of NATO membership during the Bucharest declaration, boldly claiming, “We agreed today that these countries will become members of NATO.”
3/ In 1990, U.S. Secretary of State James Baker and German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher promised the Kremlin not to expand NATO eastwards in return for German unification. However, since then, NATO has incorporated 14 additional Eastern European countries.
Read 19 tweets
Feb 16
Here's a big lie from a Feb 16, 2017 FBI briefing (not known who was briefing/being briefed):

The briefer claims that Trump's "Russia if you're listening" comment triggered Downer to come forward. That's a lie. Downer came forward earlier. Strzok told the same lie in his book.
Here's the analogous section from Strzok's book. I called out Strzok's lie at the time. He then claimed he misremembered because he didn't have his notes when he wrote his book.

Now we know that too was a lie, a lie about a lie. The FBI was pushing the Downer lie all along.
Here's the original tweet in which I called out Stzrok's lie about Downer. Btw, @CBSNews and @CBSDavidMartin still haven't corrected their false reporting on this.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 3
Rough translation of a key section of Wiesendanger taking Drosten to the woodshed.

Drosten, who founded the Gain of Function advocacy group "Scientists for Science" in 2014 has had the entire German media to himself. Finally his lies are being called out.
archive.fo/KzjNw
Another key section. cc @R_H_Ebright
Drosten got excessively triggered by the publication of this Cicero article today, so much so that he called a renowned scientist an extremist. Of course, Drosten never offered an explanation for his fraudulent Lancet letter, which was one of the points raised by Wiesendanger.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 29
1/ Interesting supplemental filing from Durham. Horowitz must have complained that Durham publicly exposed him. But the supplemental filing does not address the crucial issues, i.e. it does not address Horowitz's lies and omissions about Sussmann, it only covers Baker's phones.
2/ Remarkably, even though the supplement is limited to Baker's phones, it is speculative on that issue. Horowitz says it's "likely" Durham was told about the phones in 2018. Durham says he does not recall being told. Be that as it may, the main issue is left totally unaddressed.
3/ Never mind what was or wasn't said in 2018. The point is that Horowitz failed to disclose his possession of the phones in Oct 2021 when Durham specifically requested any information that may be relevant to the Sussmann case (Baker is the main witness, his phones are relevant).
Read 5 tweets
Jan 11
Hi @JonnaMazet, perhaps you can tell us why Daszak got you involved as he was trying to conceal viral sequence data from Wuhan?

Perhaps you could also share why you claim the virus didn't come out of the lab? You link to Daszak's Lancet letter. Is that your evidence? Seriously?
“We may finally begin to get ahead of the curve and prevent pandemics.”

That's not quite how it worked out, is it Jonna?
ucdavis.edu/news/new-sars-…
Hey @JonnaMazet, looks like you published 15 papers together with Daszak. Some people might call that a conflict of interest.

profiles.ucsf.edu/jonna.mazet
Read 5 tweets
Dec 15, 2021
“Wuhan lab leak 'now the most likely origin of Covid', MPs told”

We’ve come a long way from “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin."

telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/12/1…
There are many ways we know it came out of the lab. This is probably still the best reason.
Daszak's explanation as to why he didn't have a conflict of interest is mind-bogglingly insane. Yet, instrad of taking down Daszak's fraudulent natural origins letter, the editor of the Lancet (himself a CCP stooge) spent a year negotiating with Daszak. What is going on?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(