"Following revelations the Morrison government pressured AGL to sack its last chief executive, energy companies have increasingly isolated Angus Taylor.”
"This is a story about trust. More specifically, it is a story about just how little trust the major energy companies have for Angus Taylor and the rest of the Morrison government."
[Trust is critical in government and governing, but we’ve seen this government willing to completely destroy trust in numerous areas, including on the international stage.]
"“When Frank Calabria came to me I said, ‘Let’s work together to see to make sure we do this [close Eraring] in a responsible way that will ensure that we continue to deliver reliable and affordable electricity,’ ” Kean says. “And that’s what we did.”"
"“For the six months while we were working through the process, nothing leaked,” says Kean. “I think they trusted us to deal with them in good faith, and that we weren’t going to play politics with the issue. We got a good result because of that trust.””
"Kean says the company wanted it kept confidential. He refers again to the “trust relationship” he and his office had with Calabria. When asked why Taylor ... was kept out of the loop, he says: “Perhaps because they didn’t have that same trust relationship.””
"Tim Buckley, a leading energy analyst, puts it more bluntly: “Angus Taylor is irrelevant. Neither the state minister nor the CEO of Origin bothered to talk to him, even while they were negotiating for all those months.””
[Two key ingredients to call out here: a) a willingness to negotiate in good faith; and b) a desire and ability to maintain confidentiality. We’ve seen both ignored time and again.]
"“You’ve got the states competing with each other, now. They’re developing their own renewable energy zones, and it’s all about leveraging the renewable generation and then having the right grid infrastructure and putting the renewables near it”
[Note: @griffithSaul has been pointing out that this model of renewables is still rooted in old ways of thinking, and that we can do better. BUT: it *is* very good for heavy industry.]
"Back in 2017, when AGL gave five years’ notice of its intention to close its Liddell power plant in 2022, then minister for the Environment and Energy Josh Frydenberg worked vigorously and personally to lobby the company’s board to remove chief executive Andy Vesey.”
[I still find this story incredible, both for its content and for the lack of scrutiny of Frydenburg it has raised. These are the actions we see from bullies. It worked, by the way - Vesey was replaced as CEO and AGL wound back it’s emissions reduction ambitions]
"Frydenberg began calling directors. He pressured them to sack Vesey over the proposed Liddell closure. As one executive described the...campaign against Vesey […]: “Frydenberg was calling individual directors, suggesting [Vesey] be sacked over Liddell.””
"In a media release, Taylor claimed the early closures would “leave a considerable gap” in the NEM. He said the exit of such a considerable amount of “reliable” generation capacity was “a concern for the continued reliability and affordability of the system”.
[This is part of what I mean by not acting in good faith, but it is also part of a broader pattern of intellectual dishonesty we see across the Morrison government - a willingness to twist the truth that is almost a reflex.]
[Taylor puts together two statements that are each true, even banal, but taken together - as they will be - they amount to something else all together. It creates, knowingly, a distortion of the truth without uttering a falsehood.]
[And so if you look at Taylor’s statement, and look at the sentences in isolation, taking each literally, they’re unremarkable. But together they raise the spectre of a looming spike in energy prices directly resulting from these closures. Which is incorrect.]
"The proposal was entirely compatible with the blueprint of the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) for the future electricity grid, laid out in its draft integrated system plan.
Yet Taylor felt the need to warn of potential blackouts and price hikes.”
"He rubbished the plan hammered out between Origin and Kean to install a big battery as part of the deal, misrepresenting its purpose in much the same way as the government misrepresented the purpose of the original 100Mw “big battery” installed in SA in 2017.”
"In short, Taylor played politics with the issue. This is just as Origin executives feared he would. He was promptly called out on it by Australia’s second-wealthiest individual, the iron ore magnate and renewable energy advocate Andrew Forrest.”
"“The reality is the economics of coal-fired power stations are being put under increasing, unsustainable pressure by cleaner and lower-cost generation... When the coal sector itself says that, you know the end has well and truly come.””
[Forrest is not invested in coal, but he is investing in green hydrogen, and has plans for those generation sites and the transmission infrastructure they provide.]
[Taylor has previously said he wants market-based interventions rather than government ones, but he appears unhappy with the market choosing to shut down it’s coal assets.]
"“Let me be really clear about something,” he said after the takeover bid was announced. “We need to ensure that our coal-fired generation of electricity runs to its life because if it doesn’t, electricity prices go up. They don’t go down…”
"Electricity generation remains by far the dirtiest sector of the Australian economy. Despite the growth of renewables over recent years – mostly wind and solar – power generation is responsible for about 40 per cent of Australia’s emissions of planet-heating CO2.”
[It would be so, so easy for Australia to cut our emissions by 40% - a real cut, not the pretend cuts from not clearing land - by accelerating our transition away from coal-fired energy.]
"Were the Cannon-Brookes–Brookfield takeover to succeed, and were Bayswater and Loy Yang closed by 2030… the cumulative total of avoided emissions would be 290m tonnes of CO2, according to calculations provided for @satpaper by Tim Buckley, of Climate Energy Finance.” #SatPaper
"That avoided pollution has a dollar value, Buckley says. Applying the current carbon price operating in the European Union, he says “that is $A40.94 billion of value being created in avoided emissions”.”
[I want to look at those numbers for a moment. The bid was $8bn. The shut-down plan includes a further $20bn investment in additional generation capacity. $28bn. To create $41bn in value.
"In Feb 2015, Andy Vesey was hired as AGL’s new chief executive and managing director… He commissioned a detailed internal report into how AGL might adapt to a “carbon constrained future” and in Feb 2016 said: “We need to be out of the CO2 emissions business.””
"That same month, AGL announced its intention to close Liddell.
The timing of the Liddell announcement was embarrassing for the federal Coalition, a few months out from an election and running hard with an anti-renewables, pro-coal narrative it saw as politically advantageous."
"In the protracted political fight that ensued, the government impugned Vesey’s motives, suggesting his plan was to remove generating capacity from the grid to push up power prices. Subjected to constant political pressure ... he left AGL in Aug 2018.”
[When Vesey stepped down from AGL the company’s share price was hovering around $21/share. Today it is $7.43/share. That’s a loss in value of around $9bn thanks to Frydenburg’s interference.]
"The government has warned darkly that it could block the current bid under foreign investment controls. Liberal Party insiders tell @SatPaper that such a move is being seriously considered. Frydenberg, the man who sought Vesey’s ousting, is now the treasurer.”
"Says Matt Kean: “We are being inundated. There’s no shortage of actors that want to build renewables; there’s no shortage of actors that want to build storage.””
[I believe Kean was speaking *before* NSW began flooding.]
"“Our Central Coast, Hunter renewable energy zone closed their expressions of interest last week, and we had 40 gigawatts of interest. That is the private market saying, ‘We want to build 40 GW of capacity. And that was worth about $100bn – all private-sector capital.” #SatPaper
"“If he [Mike Cannon-Brookes] wants to spend about $10 billion worth of his and Brookfield’s capital to build wind, solar, batteries and replacement capacity so that he can bring forward the closure dates of those big power stations, fine.””
[This brings me back to the fairly stunning response from Taylor, which stands in stark contrast to Kean. The Morrison government should have been cheering on MCB-Brookfield. The full pom-pom & champagne response. Instead - obstruction.]
"The trouble is, that is where the politics still are, at the federal level. The Morrison government has campaigned against stronger climate action at every election since it won office. Last time it ran on disinformation about electric cars.”
One of the things that should be obvious is that action on climate change is a mainstream, central issue - the need for action, and the nature of that action, and the speed of that action - should be a discussion that brings us together in common cause...
Instead, it used by the political parties - primarily the Coalition and the Greens - as a political tool to create division. You can see the centrist forces backing climate action within the many Voices of independent candidates. Life-long, small l liberals who want action.
These people aren’t being spoken to by the larger parties. They’re being called radicals by the coalition; and not activist enough by the Greens. Labor is silent for fear of getting caught in the cross-fire.
We’ve had a few important pieces of economic data released recently and it’s worth just walking through them:
* GDP growth is up, with economic activity increasing by 3.4% in the Dec quarter;
* CPI increased by 1.3% in the Dec Quarter;
* Wages grew by 0.7% in the Dec quarter
* Company profits rose 2% (nearly triple the growth in wages)
* Property prices grew 22% nationally in 2021
* The ASX increased in value 13.6%
* The average rent in Australia increased 7.6%
Despite relatively low unemployment (4.2%) wage earners and renters in Australia went backwards in 2021. Rents rose; prices rose; and wages didn't come close to keeping pace.
But company profits did. And house prices did. And the sharemarket did.
OK, so let’s take a quick look at today’s CPI figures, and they’re not great numbers. But first, some context around the CPI, why it's of interest, and what today's numbers mean (and don't mean but will try to be blamed on anyway)...
1. Let's start with some context. CPI - Consumer Price Index - is an economic measure that gives us some sense for how quickly prices are going up. The ABS looks at a 'basket' of standard household goods* and tracks their price on a regular basis.
CPI jumps around somewhat, and it can be distorted by the movements of specific goods in response to global events. These can have short-term influences over CPI, which the ABS tends to smooth out of the index. There are methodological questions about what's in that 'basket'...
If we were to treat the climate crisis like a design project, and engage with all of the various stakeholders, I think (broadly), there would be agreement on a few key points: 1. The climate is warming, it's caused by our actions, and it's not a good thing.
2. The main action that's driving climate change is the extraction of fossil fuels from the ground (coal, oil & gas), and burning them to produce energy; 3. The business of fossil fuel extraction, processing and distribution keeps a fair number of people employed;
4. We have a narrow, and narrowing, window in which to turn this cycle around so that the amount of carbon emissions produced peaks, reduces, and ultimately moves to a net-negative so the level of these gases in our atmosphere is reduced.
[Sidebar: what’s you ‘favourite’ Coalition slogan?]
"In the past two elections we were bombarded with “Jobs and growth”. Absent any detail, we were left asking, Which growth? In what sectors? On what time line?”
[I’m not sure how widespread that kind of critical thinking was at the time, but he’s right.]
I’m going to keep banging on about government accountability until the next election, so let’s begin today’s reading of the @SatPaper with @KarenMMiddleton’s article: Federal integrity commission could cover Christian Porter’s blind trust.
"Amanda Stoker, assistant minister to the attorney-general, has raised new questions about whether a federal integrity commission would cover Christian Porter’s blind trust”…
Lest we forget the story behind this statement, MP Christian Porter recently resigned from the front bench of the Morrison government in order to avoid declaring the names of donors who contributed to his defamation suit legal fees via a trust.