1. Putin has shown us how he likes to kill. He uses poison. I've said for days he's going to poison Europe with nuclear contamination and claim that's he's a genius because we let him do it knowing full well his past modus operandi.
2. Allowing him to hold Ukrainian power plants is like giving Jack the Ripper a set of surgical scalpels. We are dealing with a dying psychopath who has been a professional killer his entire adult life. How do you think this ends? I think he burns the entire planet down.
3. The survival of the planet is in the hands of the Russian strategic fleet and strategic rocket forces who may not want to live in the dying planet that the killer wants as his great masterpiece of death. Getting the facts of Putin's declining mental state to the Russian
4. force is critical. Putin knew that was a potential weakness so he had to bar the door and shut down all media. Kicking the door down with projected media is critical and should be a top @NSAGov@CIA@DefenseIntel priority. @POTUS@WHNSC@ODNIgov
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Looking at Putin's apparent declining physical appearance made me think of the film "Apocalypse Now" and how to end Putin's reign of terror. The film was reported at the time to have been loosely based on "Heart of Darkness," a 1899 novella by Joseph Conrad,
2. about a ferry captain in the Congo. It was based on Conrad's life. He had become the master of a Congo ferry when the captain became ill. His novella was centered around the character of Kurtz, who was caught up in the world of what was described as
3. savagery in the heart of Africa. But in the film, the character of Colonel Kurtz took savagery to a new level. In the book, Kurtz dies of natural causes. In the film Coppola chose to delve into another obscure 19the century literary work, the Golden Bough.
1. Nuclear weapons allow a monster like Putin to threaten, thinking his threats to kill his own country should make us allow him to roll over every non-NATO member.
First, Russian air force is no match for the US. A squadron of F-22s could establish a no-fly and deal with any
2. Russian incursion. They won't get a shot off and will be shot down without any trouble. With F-35s riding shotgun w/HARMS and SDBs we can take out any Russian radar that becomes a threat.
Second, the Russian navy is not even close to our capability. We can sink every ship.
TASS- Putin no doubt reminds Erdogan that his guy murdered RF ambassador, that Erdo shot down a Russian fighter/bomber and he has the proof Erdogan was selling ISIS' oil and Yazidis sex slave in Gaziantep. @DI_Ukraine
2. Izvestia pretends that Putin was going to follow Minsk. Russian signed it but claims it was not a party. Just a disinterested bystander.
3. @kommersant has what appears to be real news that may signal the feelings of the Russian bourgeoisie that is watching their wealth be destroyed by the Communist sociopath in the Kremlin.
1. Congress should consider passing an emergency amendment to the Trading With the Enemy Act that gives @POTUS the power to impose the Act during times like this without going to a full declared state of war. It would allow the complete and permanent seizure of all Russian
2. national property in the US including all intellectual property. The party impacted never gets it back absent buying it from the person to whom the US custodian sells it. I have some knowledge of this power due to my my extended family having been subject to it twice in
3. WWI and WWII. Only recently have they re-acquired their US trademarks. It took over 70 years. All Russian citizens bank and stock holdings would be wiped out in a single moment. They would never get it back. That money becomes our money. Having that power will give us the
1. I predicted Putin would bite off Donbas when his play didn't work. He already had control but now he's going to steal what ever hasn't already been stolen and extract the coal. It's theft.
Putin calls Macron and Scholtz first. I surmised they told him this was the offramp.
2. If not, I'm watching for some comment from them denouncing it. If we were not in the decision making on this there should be hell to pay.
3. If we knew they had discussed this and were not surprised by it then this joint call might make sense in a "job well-done" context. If they pitched this or discussed it and we didn't know that's entire other matter and at a min we need to know what they got for staying quiet.