(🔓) Whether you’re a video game publisher looking for devs to work with; a gamer looking for 700 new NES games to play (and links to each); or a collector collecting the rarest games anywhere—“NES2” games—this historic archive at RETRO is for you. #nesdevretrostack.substack.com/p/the-top-500-…
1/ In between writing about insurrection, inflation, infection and invasion, I’ve been working to catalog the efforts of what I think is one of the most interesting—and fastest-growing—art communities in the world: regular folks who learned to code so they could make video games.
2/ Gaming is the biggest entertainment industry in the world; Nintendo is the biggest name in that industry; the Nintendo Entertainment System is literally the foundation upon which the video game industry was built; and now *anyone can easily learn to make games for it*. Crazy!
3/ With the development of non-coding tools like NESMaker, anyone can—admittedly, with a lot of work—make a video game. And the most vibrant community of such artists are those making games for the original NES. They’ve now made as many games as the original licensed NES library!
4/ *Many* of these games are as good as original NES games—but are still looking for an audience and/or for a publisher to give their work the attention it deserves. I mean it when I say that I hope publishers will follow this RETRO series and reach out to the devs listed in it.
5/ I also hope this listing (and more importantly, the games in it) will encourage more people to learn how to make their own video game. And even if that’s not your bag, if you ever loved the NES, you’re sure to find games in this archive—with links to them!—that you will adore.
Hope you’ll let your friends in the #nesdev community know about this article!
NOTE/ Just want to add that this really is 700 21st c. *original NES homebrews*, meaning that—a handful a hybrid cases aside—this archive has no hacks, localizations, unreleased games from the 80/90s or duplicate entries. There’s no artificial inflation of the total library size.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Americans must get better at recognizing radicals. A radical is identified by ideas and actions—not appearance. Bill Barr is more radical than almost any balaclava-wearing street-fighting political rascal you’ve ever seen in a grainy, shaky YouTube video. Ignore his suit and tie.
PS/ Barr appears on TV because he wears a suit and tie, was once marginally respectable, and was selected by the biggest traitor in American history to occupy a role with an impressive title. But by his ideas and actions, he’s a fringe radical with no place in American discourse.
PS2/ Barr’s views on the executive branch are radical and even deranged—and have no place in American history or discourse. That these views are also *fraudulent* (they only apply when a Republican runs the executive branch) marks him as a suit-and-tie wearing far-right militant.
Ruling for a Trumpist, the Trump appointee said “we’re at a moment in which interest in free and fair elections is at its peak. [My job is to protect] the soapbox, ballot box and jury box. When those fail, that’s when people proceed to the ammunition box.” cnn.com/2022/03/04/pol…
(PS) The Trump-appointed judge somehow managed to rule *both* that the disqualification clause related to all rebellions in the United States—past and future—*and* that the 1872 amnesty for Confederates was a prospective amnesty for all future rebellions.
Think on that a moment.
(PS2) The problem is that in his first finding he confirmed the Founders knew how to write language that applied to all rebellions past and present; with his second finding, he said that *even when the Founders specifically only referenced Confederates* they meant all rebellions.
🚨: If not for the war in Europe, the story below might’ve been one of world’s biggest today. The largest-ever study comparing those who got COVID-19 and recovered and those who never got infected reveals major lasting health problems for the former group. cnn.com/2022/03/04/opi…
1/ Many of us have been saying since March 2020—2 years ago—that until we have years of data on the effect of getting sick with COVID-19, the proper attitude is to presume there could be unforeseen long-term effects even if one doesn’t get hospitalized. Our view was marginalized.
2/ To be clear, our view was marginalized by Republicans and Democrats alike, by anti-vaxxers and the CDC alike. All those who saw the pandemic as political had something to gain by focusing almost exclusively on hospitalizations and deaths and writing policy based on that data.
BREAKING NEWS: Convicted Seditious Conspirator Was in Hotel Suite of Trump Adviser Roger Stone Mere Hours Before the January 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol, Bringing Trump a Step Closer to a Known Seditious Conspiracy; Stone Was in Regular Contact with Trump washingtonpost.com/investigations…
MORE: Stone Had Clandestine Contact with Alleged Seditious Conspirator Stewart Rhodes, Criminal Leader of the Proud Boys Enrique Tarrio, and Domestic Terrorist Ali Alexander—All While in Regular Contact with His 40-Year Friend Donald Trump, Sitting President of the United States
MORE: “Stone did not permit the filmmakers to record him for a 90-minute period covering the height of the violence on January 6. A Stone aide blocked a cameraman from entering his suite, claiming Stone was napping. When he eventually got inside, Stone was speaking on his phone.”
I just saw the editor of a publication describe Proof of Corruption as “a book on Trump’s impeachments” and therefore irrelevant to the Russia-Ukraine crisis. It was published 6 months before the second impeachment and *2* of its 44 chapters address the first impeachment trial.
Proof of Corruption is a book about Russia, Ukraine, and Trump that takes single-chapter diversions—9 of 44 chapters—into other Trump scandals with similar themes. It’s because it’s an urgent Russia-Ukraine book that I gave away so much of it for free pre- *and* post-publication.
We don’t realize how often publications lie in the belief their lies won’t be noticed. I *certainly* know these outlets don’t correct their lies when caught, even when they’ve insisted—to make a false point—a book is about something it isn’t and was published a year after it was.
(🔐) Hey! As we’re now discussing how John Eastman committed crimes—and advised Trump to commit crimes (crimes Trump had already been advised by other attorneys were crimes)—can we also note that John Eastman got his ideas from “close friend” Ginni Thomas? sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
(PS) Eastman was *not* a rogue lawyer operating in a vacuum. He was brought aboard Trump’s legal team by Cleta Mitchell, who is a top official in *both* of the secretive organizations Ginni Thomas runs *and*—like Eastman—is a close friend and associate of Thomas going *way* back.
(PS2) I want Eastman and Trump held accountable, but I also want those who wound up Eastman like a toy soldier and pointed him at Trump held accountable. Eastman appears to have committed crimes here, but he’s no criminal mastermind. Ginni Thomas is *above* him on the food chain.