We put together a team of macro-, micro- and energy economists to think about the question: what would be the effects on the German economy of a stop of energy imports from Russia?
In short: moderate, especially in combination with the right policy response.
Summary:
- no single study finds deviation of yearly GDP from baseline larger than 5.3%
- no single study finds recession with GDP drop larger than 2.5%
Our review builds heavily on the careful and highly recommended survey by @SVR_Wirtschaft
Of course, any model-based quantitative assessment is necessarily subject to a large degree of uncertainty, both with respect to parameter values and functional form assumptions and in the form of uncertainty about model choice and assumptions (“model uncertainty”).
We nevertheless think that the combined body of work suggests that:
- a recession with year-to-year GDP drop of >5% seems highly unlikely
- a recession with GDP drop of 10 or 15% or even Great Depression-type scenario is completely implausible
As we said many times, these numbers -- GDP deductions of 3% or 5%, or a recession with a 2% GDP drop -- are substantial.
But they do not amount to an economic catastrophe.
In case this wasn't clear and to put it a bit more bluntly: the "completely implausible" scenarios include
- "the loss of millions of jobs" (@Bundeskanzler Scholz)
🤓 Nerd tweet for the heterogeneous-agent macro crowd
You like sequence-space Jacobians? But you also like working in continuous time?
Then I have just the thing for you! 🤓
Two very nice recent papers and some code:
1. René Glawion's very nice continuous-time implementation of the @a_auclert @BardoczyBence Rognlie @ludwigstraub sequence-space method:
- “Sequence-Space Jacobians in Continuous Time”
- GitHub repository with codes papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf… github.com/reneglawion/Se…
2. @AdrienBilal and Shlok Goyal's paper on the same topic
- "Some Pleasant Sequence-Space Arithmetic in Continuous Time"
It's about Bob's incredible gift as a writer and his generosity toward his students.
It's the fall of 2009 and I'm a grad student at the University of Chicago. Bob is on my thesis committee.
I've just finished a first draft of my job market paper with which I will be applying for assistant professor jobs. I've put *a ton* of work into the paper and I'm pretty happy with it overall. I email it to Bob asking whether he could take a look, hoping for some verbal comments
Below is what it looked like at the time.
A day later Bob emails me back saying "Come by my office, I've got some minor comments."
Here is a collection of some of the most extreme doomsday predictions. Two reasons:
- provide a benchmark to which to compare the substantial economic costs 🇩🇪 has seen
- the hope that the worst offenders (particularly those with ulterior motives) will lose some credibility
1. @BASF CEO Martin Brudermüller said an end to Russian gas would cause "the largest economic crisis since World War II" adding "Do we knowingly want to destroy our entire economy?"
My reason for taking another shot at explaining this: if people don't understand the policy, then it won't work as intended. So communication is key. Just as @R2Rsquared writes here.
Main points: this is
- a lump-sum scheme
- NOT a price cap / subsidy
- NOT a non-linear pricing scheme, e.g. a cap on 80% of past consumption
-- > people can save a lot of money on their energy bills by reducing their gas consumption also below 80%