Share this page!

Alexandros Marinos Profile picture
Twitter logo
Mar 8 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Legitimately one of the most worrying tweets I've seen this year.
It basically indicates that Elizabeth Warren's agenda is already being enacted.
Which is basically Kendi's agenda of an unelected body that can oversee every other institution and veto anything it determines will have unequal outcomes.
This ultimately devolves to an iran-style managed democracy, where elections are not allowed to change the country in ways the Supreme leader disapproves of. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_…
So if you enjoyed your antiscientific totalitarian emergency over the last few years, prepare for it to merge with wokeness. What could *possibly* go right?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Alexandros Marinos

Alexandros Marinos Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @alexandrosM

Alexandros Marinos Profile picture
Mar 8
OK folks. Put on your full body tin foil hazmat suits, because we're about to dive deep.

This 🧵 will cover links between:
Ukraine. Biolabs. Hunter Biden. Ecohealth.

I seriously wish I was kidding.
So, what are these Ukrainian biolabs? They appear to be run by a company called Metabiota.

The linked article has a *lot* of information I'd prefer to confirm more tightly first, but time is of the essence, so decide for yourselves: armswatch.com/the-pentagon-b… Image
So how did they do in Sierra Leone during the Ebola outbreak? CBS says.. not well. cbsnews.com/news/american-… Image
Read 15 tweets
Alexandros Marinos Profile picture
Mar 8
The Lancet: tip of the narrative spear🧵

From lab leak to early treatment, and from transmission to lockdowns, the Lancet was always there to make some absolutely understandable errors, but always in the same direction.
1. Delayed letting the world know about human-to-human transmission.

2. Forgot to check for conflicts of interest in the letter that made lab leak untouchable for over a year.

Read 10 tweets
Alexandros Marinos Profile picture
Mar 7
Phil Harper just had a major breakthrough in the investigation of the Andrew Hill meta-analysis.

The name of Andrew Owen, Prof at University of Liverpool and UNITAID grantee appears in the metadata of some digital versions of Andrew Hill's meta-analysis.
philharper.substack.com/p/professor-ti…
Quote:"The person who allegedly edited the Andrew Hill paper on Ivermectin, is the person in receipt of consultancy fees from pharma with competing products, is the person who prepared the evidence base for the World Health Organisation to make their recommendation on Ιvermectin"
Subscribe to this man's substack if you can afford it.
Read 5 tweets
Alexandros Marinos Profile picture
Mar 5
A short film is out with Dr. Tess Lawrie's zoom call with Dr. Andrew Hill admitting that his sponsor, UNITAID, was an unacknowledged contributor affecting the conclusion of his Ιvermectin meta-analysis. It was treated as authoritative by the WHO & governments.

Part 1:
Part 2:
Here's the website for the documentary, and perhaps there's a longer version in the works if I understand correctly?
oraclefilms.com/alettertoandre…
Read 5 tweets
Alexandros Marinos Profile picture
Feb 27
OK, tell me about everything dodgy about Event 201.
The first mention of Event 201 I can find on the web is on August 21, 2019. This is important because it's not implausible that a lab leak could have happened before then.

centerforhealthsecurity.org/news/center-ne…
Why was it named event 201? Ryan Morhard gives us the down-low.
Read 4 tweets
Alexandros Marinos Profile picture
Feb 27
Come on guys, give it up already. Image
Guess who jumped on this?
I'm not just being glib. Even if it is research by deeply conflicted people who are implicated in the original coverup or at least suppression of the lab leak hypothesis, and committed academic misconduct along the way, the findings should be examined.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @alexandrosM has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @alexandrosM!

Read all threads by @alexandrosM

:(