A short film is out with Dr. Tess Lawrie's zoom call with Dr. Andrew Hill admitting that his sponsor, UNITAID, was an unacknowledged contributor affecting the conclusion of his Ιvermectin meta-analysis. It was treated as authoritative by the WHO & governments.

Part 1:
Part 2:
Here's the website for the documentary, and perhaps there's a longer version in the works if I understand correctly?
oraclefilms.com/alettertoandre…
Before anyone jumps in to make claims about whether ivm does or does not work, this isn't the issue here, and we can all have our disagreements on that. The question is whether we followed the established scientific process, whether we gave this drug and others a fair hearing.
The Andrew Hill controversy is just the first of many strange coincidences with Tess Lawrie's meta-analysis. Both Cochrane and the Lancet dragged the process out and delayed the publication with arbitrary editorial decisions. More: rumble.com/vngg18-news-ro…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexandros Marinos

Alexandros Marinos Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @alexandrosM

Mar 8
Legitimately one of the most worrying tweets I've seen this year.
It basically indicates that Elizabeth Warren's agenda is already being enacted.
Which is basically Kendi's agenda of an unelected body that can oversee every other institution and veto anything it determines will have unequal outcomes.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 7
Phil Harper just had a major breakthrough in the investigation of the Andrew Hill meta-analysis.

The name of Andrew Owen, Prof at University of Liverpool and UNITAID grantee appears in the metadata of some digital versions of Andrew Hill's meta-analysis.
philharper.substack.com/p/professor-ti…
Quote:"The person who allegedly edited the Andrew Hill paper on Ivermectin, is the person in receipt of consultancy fees from pharma with competing products, is the person who prepared the evidence base for the World Health Organisation to make their recommendation on Ιvermectin"
Read 5 tweets
Feb 27
OK, tell me about everything dodgy about Event 201.
The first mention of Event 201 I can find on the web is on August 21, 2019. This is important because it's not implausible that a lab leak could have happened before then.

centerforhealthsecurity.org/news/center-ne…
Why was it named event 201? Ryan Morhard gives us the down-low.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 27
Come on guys, give it up already. Image
I'm not just being glib. Even if it is research by deeply conflicted people who are implicated in the original coverup or at least suppression of the lab leak hypothesis, and committed academic misconduct along the way, the findings should be examined.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 23
I'll document this case of aggressive dishonesty from @AviBittMD as a reference for why I will no longer be engaging him in the future, as he's heavy on the insults and light on the substance.

So, he claims that my claim was false because remdesivir succeeded in a similar trial.
He contests this claim I made about the JAMA study:

"In brief, the study design was such that any other antiviral, such as Paxlovid or Molnupiravir, would also have failed."
In my second tweet, I demonstrated the problem with a helpful image:
Read 17 tweets
Feb 21
A 🧵 of cases where data has been withheld or updates suspended, explicitly because the Authorities did not want the Commoners to "misunderstand" and "misinterpret" it.

As usual, I'll start with the ones I know, and please respond with more cases you are aware of.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(