As soon as the preprint dropped we were on it and the usual minimizers tried to convince it was meaningless. Balloux, JasnahKholin, SZ, because they are on the side of the economic interests that want you to unmask to gain immunity by infection
We all know that doesn't work...
A lot of idiots think that you will gain immunity against this by infection, and if you are reminded that you are getting brain damaged you won't fall into their scam, so they minimize
Ultimately you will just save on pensions if you keep getting infected
I implicate a feed-forward model of T cell differentiation and death, with a canonically paired negative feedback loop as is prototypically seen with natural feedforward control models. This negative feedback loop has ramifications.
So while Tn will quell exuberant function, Teff/Tem will deplete Tn/scm more rapidly if they interact in Lymphoid tissue. The T cells act as a quorum and Tem can slough off the Tn
Why you see depletion in LC; bystander activation and increased sloughing thanks to colocalization
Wow scam accounts can't interpret what t cell aging means. No it doesnt mean people would drop dead from reinfections right away. What it means is there is a decompensation when control is not achieved where T cells contribute to harm via overexuberance
Don't put words in my mouth if you have a feeble understanding of immune-mediated pathology to begin with.
Idiots
The scams/frauds couldn't even remotely conceive that CD8 t cells would be contributing to harm.
More and more papers about the harm they exert
Without scientific imagination you couldnt predict it, and without a brain and eyes you dont read it doi.org/10.1016/j.cell…