I'm delighted to have assisted @Twitter engineers in their adoption of #OnionServices & #OnionNetworking from @TorProject — providing greater privacy, integrity, trust, & "unblockability" for people all around the world who use @Twitter to communicate.
I am also honoured that they've chosen to adopt EOTK (the Enterprise Onion Toolkit) to power their onion platform, albeit with considerable though reasonable modification to meet their extraordinary production requirements:
From past experience with the Facebook and BBC Onion sites, any sufficiently large announcement leads to a load-spike, and given that @TwitterSafety has 3.6 million followers it would not be wise in a time of global crisis.
The Twitter and Facebook Onion Sites, as well as others such as the New York Times, BBC, Deutsche Welle, Radio Free Europe and others, are documented on the #RealWorldOnionSites page at:
In 2014 I led the team which launched the @Facebook onion; there have been occasional conversations re: "an onion for Twitter" ever since. This is the result of many peoples efforts, over years, and I'd like to thank them all for their perseverance.
ps: before anyone asks / for purposes of clarity: I am not a Twitter employee. I just help large organisations which want to adopt #OnionServices.
1/ So @StevenLevy has written at length about the "Badge Posts" - the goodbye, final messages posted for other employees to read as they leave the company.
2/ But these are not just "human interest" stories; some are meant to achieve something, and in my case the goal was to move Facebook away from implementing national identities & censorship within the Facebook platform.
3/ But I felt that that was not enough to explain what was going on, how Facebook may be changed, and the critical importance of fostering frank and constructive engagement in order to make effective change.
Frances is talking to @CommonsDCMS tomorrow, so she should have opportunity to bring this message of privacy and safety to people who would benefit from it.
SATURDAY NIGHT THOUGHTS: it'll be weird if the echo-chamber of politicians, journalists, and "safety" / child-protection advocates succeed in somehow banning algorithmic content feeds… and then evaporate when the rage which feeds their community dialectic eventually dissipates.
Say we all move to "chronological" feed ranking as the sole metric. QUANGOs and Charities are not natural "friends" of people, so they'll have to vastly increase their posting and reposting rates in order to maintain visibility.
This will annoy "power users" who follow them.
The net result will be that "worthy" causes either suffer a dramatic drop in direct engagement, OR ELSE they lose access to influential followers.
There's a potential workaround in curated interest "lists", but RSS taught us that most people won't put in the effort.
3/ However it seems egregious of Ms Dick to raise this on the anniversary of a event which was clearly not enabled by E2E-Encryption - because there was hardly any of it in 2001.
Hell, the Paris attacks 14 years later, were arranged via plaintext SMS: