Let's start by defining what a synthetic asset is, and what makes it different than a wrapped asset.
A wrapped asset is collateralized by the asset its wrapping, while a synthetic is collateralized by one more assets (synthesizing an asset from multiple).
Because wrapped assets have no correlation to the security of the network, they can and often exceed the value of the network securing it. THORChain's synthetics are collateralized by the pools, so 50% the asset, and 50% $RUNE.
Because the synth is half backed by $RUNE, it can always ensure economic security of the synthetics, and that the network security is always greater than the value of the synthetics, even if they go 1000x up in value.
Why would someone want a synthetic asset? 1) Synthetics can be used to change the pool depths, and therefore correct the pool price to match market demands, ie arbitrage. This is super important because it means the pools can be arbs faster, cheaper, and more efficiently.
2) Trading with synthetics on THORChain has half the swap fees, making swaps cheaper, cheap gas fees, and faster for traders. You can do near instant trades at a high volume.
What does this mean for the LPs?
For anyone that mints a synth, they add capital to the pool, but DON'T take ownership of the pool. Instead any yield they would have gained is passed off to LPs. This effectively means that LPs gain the yield of a higher amount than they deposited
I hope trade volume increases on the network once arb bots flip from using L1 trades to synthetics to correct pool prices, which will be exciting to see!
Stay tuned, THORChain has more insane features coming. #THORFi
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
today, $RUNE’s fundamentals are stronger today than ever before.
1) the network is more decentralized now than ever with the highest number of nodes, which is continuously expanding.
2) the network bond are near ATH high and the pools are deeper than ever.
3) not a single core dev has left the project while there are more full time devs joining, making the dev team stronger than ever
4) the THORChain ecosystem continues to expand launching new websites, projects and communities further cementing the long term growth of the project
with integrations of economic powerhouses like @terra_money , $ATOM, @TokenReactor and much much more coming downstream, which will only drive into value of @THORChain up and up.
5) this dev team along with the greater community has proven to be able withstand even the harshest
I want to clear up @THORChain's relationship with #IBC and why it's made the decisions its made.
IBC is a good bridging design but doesn't meet the design specifications and requirements of the @THORChain project. 🧵
THORChain will be implementing IBC, but NOT for interfacing with its liquidity pools. Instead, you can beam out $RUNE and THORChain synthetic assets to other cosmos chains via IBC, but not beam in external assets via IBC. This will contribute a massive amount to the IBC ecosystem
THORChain uses its own bridging design called "Bifrost" for its pools. This was designed & developed before IBC even existed. So IBC wasn't really an option from the start. But even if it was it would have not been a good choice for the goals and design requirements of THORChain
Now that @THORChain is BACK, we should reflect on what it took to get here. Follow the 🧵
1/ Multiple external audits have been conducted, of which those audits found nothing critical (will be released publicly soon).
2/ Internal audits did find critical issues, which were of course patched.
3/ A new team was born comprised of highly experienced white hat hackers. This "red team" takes an adversarial perspective on all code changes and must approve all changes. As well as pierce current code for potential threats/exploits they can find.