Aella Profile picture
Mar 10 14 tweets 3 min read
I've spent a lot of time way deep in the psychedelic sauce and came out very permanently altered, but I seem to have somehow missed all the altered beliefs that seem to happen to many others who do a lot of eXtreme, experimental introspection. Why is this? 1/14
I don't think this is because I have any mystical virtue; maybe I just have genetics that mixed just right with a practice that accidentally avoided lots of the pitfalls that result in woo beliefs. But these are all guesses - I'd like to know why! 2/
I'm not against woo beliefs in principle, but I do think the rigor required for me to adopt a woo belief would sort of make it no longer woo. As in, I've had a powerful, direct experience of an Entity on psychedelics, but this is insufficient to make me believe in entities. 3/
I'm legit actually open to there being some cosmic force that channels predictive power into e.g. astrology, but I'm also annoyingly familiar with every single way scientific studies can go wrong, and my standards for accepting proof of predictive astrology are real high. 4/
I'm uncertain about the internal experience of people that causes them to do self-mind experiments and then land on strong, predictive beliefs about the way external reality functions. Maybe I got immunized from having spiritual experiences as a Christian, then losing my faith?
And to be clear, I think it's super likely that there's a lot of stuff going on that we currently process as woo or magic that probably has some reasonable backing to it. As I've said before, brains are powerful and complex and I 100% believe we can get way freakier. 6/
I myself hold some pretty insane-sounding perspectives I got out of my deep dives, that I don't usually say to anyone cause it's real hard to explain without sounding unhinged. But my frames are *not predictive*, which feels like a real important distinction. 7/
It almost feels like woo-believers are failing to grasp their own power. In holding predictive beliefs about the world, they're placing the power *into the world.* They rely on the cycle of the planets to grant them authority, or an impressed recipient to verify the telepathy. 8/
This is an inherently vulnerable position - it's possible that woo beliefs can be disproven, because they are *about the external world*, which makes testable the hypothesis that you are delusional. All the insights here are *conditional* upon a thing outside of your control. 9/
And yet the function is also to reassure the believer that they do in fact have power. They have access to information no one else does by divining the stars, or having experienced the aliens/entities/spirits, or being able to read your energy. 10/
Woo beliefs make you feel safe and special - great incentives to hold them! But *lots* of beliefs make you feel safe and special - why woo beliefs, post-spiritual experiences? I'm not sure. 11/
From my perspective, "proper" insane spiritual insights are unconditional, self-contained, and invulnerable. They are untestable, not about the world, they are owned entirely, wholly, inside your own experience. Nothing can possibly happen to make them untrue. 12/
If you have a deep experience that convinces you that somethin woo is real, I am open to woo being real, I just likely won't take your experience as strong evidence, much as I don't take my own as evidence. There's lots of better evidence we could find, so let's go looking! 13/
P.S. another caveat: I think the brain is very powerful and would not be very surprised if things like rituals or placebo or tiny, magic-like elements we don't fully understand did in fact have strong, purposeful impacts on the brain, and suspect some woo practices are effective

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aella

Aella Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Aella_Girl

Mar 7
Which rules do you use to evaluate sexual consent? In my rape survey, I found four main rule spectrums people seemed to fall on when evaluating rapeyness.

(You can be high or low on all of them, or high on just a few)

THREAD:
1. External motivation - How much motivation for the sex is not about the sex itself (e.g., getting paid, or making a partner happy) vs purely because of horniness? Some people view external motivation as clearly more consent-violatey than others.
2. Mental capacity - how much are you aware of what you're doing and the implications, going to endorse your actions later on, are of sound mind, sober, etc.? Some people have a lot more leniency for varied mental states, and others only find a narrow range to be consentable.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 24
Completely agreed with Spencer here. Probably the thing I've learned the most throughout my thousands of questions and feedback is exactly this - and despite my experience, I still find it very hard to guarantee question design that definitely won't hit any of these problems. 1/
I've also had the experience of reading about studies or measures, and then when I see their actual questions I am shocked at how easily misinterpretable they are. Regularly they use questions I would never ever use in my own research. 2/
I thought for a while that they must have their reasons, it's gotta make sense somehow, they can't be just that bad at question design.
But lately I'm starting to suspect they just outright *are* bad at it? Which freaks me out a bit and feels like it has huge implications. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Feb 2
THREAD: Male sexual energy I like vs male sexual energy I do not like
(these are examples, not absolute, just an attempt at pinning down a loose thing)

1/6
I DO NOT LIKE (in social gatherings):
*positions himself directly facing me, especially if blocking view/flow of others
*seems to agree with me too much, or
*does 'performative' disagreements; stuff that feels not-important or like he doesn't 'really' believe it
2/6
*seems both afraid of bringing up sex work and also interested in bringing it up at the same time
*downplays things about himself he thinks i might not like
*looks at me more than others, but also gives off like... sheepish vibes about it? like if i pointed it out he'd deny
3/6
Read 6 tweets
Jan 26
WOULD YOU STOP PPL FROM BEING BORN: A THREAD
--
Do you have ADHD? || If you press the button, no person with ADHD is ever born again (or develops ADHD through other means), though existing people are left unchanged. Do you press the button?
Are you overweight? || If you press the button, no person who becomes overweight (unless they decide to be and actively try) is ever born again, though existing people are left unchanged. Do you press the button?
Are you autistic? || If you press the button, no person with autism is ever born again (or become autistic through other means), though existing people are left unchanged. Do you press the button?
Read 17 tweets
Jan 24
A computer screen has clear info you can engage with, but the circuit boards shooting 1s & 0s everywhere have no info we can interact with; it makes no sense to say something like "oh, more 0s came out of this corner of the board, does this correspond to mom emailing me?" 1/
I feel similarly about very deep psychedelic experiences or very young childhood; something is going on, that *does* end up corresponding to something meaningful, but it's occurring at such a different plane of meaning that squinting at it with computer-screen eyes is useless. 2/
So I'm sus about things that try to connect current psychological states to your birth experience, or thinking you could do good communication with someone blazed on psychedelics. Seems full of projection to me, viewing through a lens you aren't aware you have. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Jan 22
You do not have ownership over other people's behavior! They have no inherent obligation to you, and you have no right to demand they behave differently than they want to.
You *can* create boundaries around you own behavior - e.g. "if you make me feel bad, I'll leave"
Other people's right to their behavior does *not* extend to violating other people's rights to theirs; as in, people do not have the right to sexually assault you. Your property, your bodily autonomy, these basic things all 'protected classes' in my eyes.
But besides this:
Your pain is your responsibility, it is created by you, owned by you. Because it's your responsibility, it's also your *right* - you have an unquestionable right to it, it is inherently valid, and nobody can tell you you shouldn't have it.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(