The latest results from the #REACT study by @imperialcollege and @IpsosMORI are out, and whilst overall prevalence is lower, there's evidence that in the 55 and over age groups it is on an upward trend, consistent with a recent increase in admissions.
A summary 🧵 1/
Overall prevalence is down from Round 17 (4.4%) to 2.9%, and within the Round (8th Feb to 1st Mar) R is estimated at 0.94, although as noted above for 55+ it is put at 1.04.
Although falling, it's still the 2nd highest ever level recorded by REACT by some margin.
2/
Regionally, most regions clearly fell from Round 17, but in contrast the South West and South East showed small, although not statistically significant increases, and along with London were the highest.
3/
At lower tier LA level, 6 were in London, and the other four were clustered in what some in my locality will still (usually without much affection) remember as the old Avon area (Bristol, South Glos, BANES and North Somerset).
4/
The proportions of BA.2 were highest in the SW and London too, and indeed the pattern here is very similar to the overall prevalence levels too, reflecting the growth advantage that BA.2 has, estimated at an additive rate of 0.4 to Rt.
5/
Indeed, by the end of the round the proportion of BA.2 cases was approaching 50% of the total. And remember Delta? Over the whole round only 1 of the 1,195 cases sequenced was found to be that variant.
6/
By age you can see here how the greatest falls from Round 17 are in the younger age bands. At older ages the falls are much lower and as noted earlier, within the Round there was evidence that over 55 prevalence was in fact increasing again.
7/
A summary here of all the 18 rounds that this fantastic study has produced over the last two years. It's been a great source of data to complement other estimates of prevalence within England, and I'd like to thank all those involved over that period.
8/8
And here's the link to the report, with much more analysis than I've covered in my summary thread.
A great thread on the state pension and National Insurance.
For me, the trailed abolition of NI and thus its replacement by general taxation in terms of funding state pension benefits will have a major generational redistribution of tax.
It’s been the case that (in aggregate) at any one time the working generation funds the SPs of the retired generation above it.
2/
If the abolition of NI results in an increase (albeit smaller - else why bother) in income tax, whilst those in work will in total be better off, pensioners will be worse off.
3/
The Pensions & Lifetime Savings Association has updated its guide to living costs in retirement. The full report is well worth a read, and goes into a lot of detail.
One key point is that it assumes that pensioners own their home outright - probably reasonable now, but the shift to renting means that in future years that may become increasingly questionable.
2/
It focuses on retirement income, but note that other sources may be used to fund retirement, whether it be income from savings/investments, or gradual withdrawal of capital. Much more likely to be relevant for those aspiring to a comfortable lifestyle of course.
3/
UKHSA estimates that prevalence of COVID in England and Scotland has nearly tripled in the month since the ONS restarted its COVID infection surveillance.
Fortunately prevalence is lowest at the oldest, more vulnerable age groups, but is estimated at just under 6% in the 18 to 44 age groups.
2/
Prevalence is estimated to be highest in the London area, at just over 6% across the population. Note though that confidence intervals are wider due to lower sample sizes than in previous studies.
So with the news this morning that the earnings growth announced today means the state pension (SP) will very likely increase by another 8.5% next year, it's time to set out once again why the SP triple lock (TL) is such a bad idea.
1/
It's all down to cherry-picking the best of the three rates each year. I did a thread nearly a year ago, that hopefully sets out clearly how the mechanism inevitably means that the SP will grow over time against both earnings (E) and prices (P).
With BH's still distorting individual weeks' figures, the cumulative position gives a better view, with the latest CMI age-standardised analysis showing mortality 3.8% (of a full year's mortality) worse than its reference year of 2019.
Here's the mea culpa - it was only wrong by a factor of 13, but at least the post has been deleted rather than just corrected and left up, when experience shows that only a fraction of the original audience will see the correction.
So what are the true numbers?
2/
In E&W the peak week in 2020 was just under 9,000, and the second wave peak was pretty close to that number.
In total ONS has recorded 199,728 COVID related deaths in E&W since the pandemic started.