"This monograph presents a survey of the crucial link between state power and finance from the ancient era through to the present day. Cicero once said that the true sinew of war was endless streams of money." press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/455/
"Investment in accordance to productive capacity"
Indeed, you want to invest in projects with real cash flows. But you also don't want your money debased via inflation. So the measure of any investment is whether it can outperform simply holding BTC.
For years, retail and professional investors alike have benchmarked their returns in BTC terms. That's why coinmarketcap.com makes charts like this easy. You can see whether the no-op of simply holding BTC outcompetes an investment.
Additionally, you can quantify the daily fees paid, which can be plugged into a DCF model just like cash flows, even though these are chains rather than businesses.
This is a different sense in which BTC and other coins actually are "productive assets". cryptofees.info
Technologies like mass production & mass media enabled the growth of centralized states till ~1950. The transistor, PC, internet, smartphone, and BTC are now *on balance* decentralizing that power...albeit not without an attempted Counter-Decentralization. sotonye.substack.com/p/if-einstein-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Capitalism is for equals, equal partners in the deal.
The ~80% of the world that is neither American nor Chinese is more than willing to trade with anyone, collaborate on science, work in a positive-sum way.
India & Israel should go hard into BTC/web3. Promote decentralized protocols that protect sovereignty, that make money, and that allow all to align behind neutral, globally fair rules.
The new non-aligned movement is economically aligned.
- They have a critical mass of founders
- They already cooperate on counterterrorism & tech
- The combined diaspora has a presence all over the world
- Neither wants to fully rely on the US
- Neither wants to be beholden to China
All the pieces are there.
I wrote about this at length last year, and I think these points still hold up today.
Crypto gives a third paradigm outside either US or Chinese control. It's thus suitable for every country that prefers sovereignty to becoming a colony. balajis.com/tag/india/
The problem of nuclear blackmail is not a trivial one. It occupied the thought of early Cold War theorists like Herman Kahn. And with more players, if one grows desperate, the dynamics could become unstable. warontherocks.com/2017/02/blackm…
@NarangVipin has a new book out on an allied topic: how do states acquire nukes?
1) sprinters: get it fast, like China 2) hedgers: keep the option, like Japan 3) sheltered pursuit: use support of a patron, like North Korea 4) hiders: totally clandestine, like South Africa
The topics are related because in the event a desperate Putin decides to (say) nuke an iceberg to show he is serious, then a number of countries that were previously on the cusp of going nuclear may do so to deter him from trying something.