1) @nytimes continues to publish its excellent battle maps. This series focuses on 3 fronts: Kiev, Kharkiv, and the wider south. I will also look at the east/Donbas front.
2) First, Kiev. Russian forces don't appear to have made major gains here, but appear to be positioning for an assault or siege of the capital. The mayor of Chernihiv said the city is now surrounded. Russian forces appear to be bypassing the city & are pushing southward to Kiev.
3) Chernihiv province is close to being enveloped. The Russian column in the northeast that we've heard so much about is reported to be fanning out across the countryside & deploying artillery/rocket launchers that oriented at the capital.
4) Russian forces are not positioned to cut off Kiev from the south at this time. North & East of the capital, Russian forces continue to position to support the Kiev operation.
5) Ukrainian forces savaged a Russian armored unit in Brovary, just east of Kiev. It is unclear if this unit retreated or moved forward after the attack. But Russian forces are clearly due east of Kiev.
6) Ukrainian forces will continue to be able to reinforce Kiev if Russian troops cannot close the southern approach.
7) East: Ukrainian forces continue to block the Russian attempts to take the city of Kharkiv. Russian troops appear to be attempting to encircle the city, advancing from the northeastern outskirts. East of Kharkiv, the Russians are advancing on Izium.
8) The Russian push to Izium poses serious problems for Ukrainian troops holding the line in the Donbas region. The @nytimes maps shows Russian forces penetrating Ukrainian lines just north of Donetsk. If they can link up with Russian troops pressing on Izium ...
9) ... then much of far eastern Ukraine & Ukrainian forces operating there will be cut off. Further west, the Russians launched their first airstrikes in Dnipro, indicating the city is now in the crosshairs. This is a linchpin city, its capture would be devastating for UKR.
10) In the south, the @nytimes map now shows the city of Polohy under Russian control. As noted in previous update, the Ukrainians have established a defensive line southeast of Zaporizhzhia, which is key to the defense of Dnipro.
11) It is unclear if the Russians will try to punch through the Zaporizhzhia defensive line or outflank it from the east and further west. A western approach may prove difficult, with several major cities to overcome. Russian force do appear to be orienting towards Kryvyi Rih.
12) Lack of reporting on the status of both Russian & Ukrainian forces in the south makes it difficult to determine what may happen. The Russian offensive in the south is ambitious, is there enough combat power to pull it off? Is Odesa or Zaporizhzhia/Dnipro the key objective?
13) Are there enough Ukrainian troops available to blunt/halt this ambitious offensive? What is the combat effectiveness of Ukrainian units in the south? There is seen anecdotal evidence that there are problems.
14) The recent advances by the Russians in the south indicates that Zaporizhzhia/Dnipro and the South Ukraine nuclear plant appear to be the prime focus in the near term. If the Russians can take the South Ukraine plant and range to the Moldavian border, Odesa is cut off.
15) A reminder that an operation of this scale was never doing to take days to complete. Stiff Ukrainian resistance has assured that. Keep in mind it took the U.S. military three weeks to reach Baghdad and 42 days to conquer Iraq.
16) The outcome is not assured, this is war and any number of factors can change the tide. At the moment the Russians have the initiative. It isn't pretty, the Russians have had their fair share of problems. But you can have tactical failures and still achieve strategic success.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) On urban warfare. This in no way should be interpreted as a defense of Russian-inflicted civilian casualties (it will anyway), which I condemn. The harsh reality is that when you decide to defend cities, you will incur civilian casualties & damage to civilian infrastructure.
2) Both sides chose to fight in an urban setting. From Mayor Vitali Klitschko: "Kyiv has been transformed into a fortress. Every street, every building, every checkpoint has been fortified." bbc.com/news/live/worl…
3) There are numerous photographs & videos from the capital and other cities that show armed checkpoints and defensive positions in or around civilian buildings & areas. I've seen video of Ukrainian troops firing anti-tank missiles from apartment building rooftops.
1) On Russian generals dying in battle. This is going to be perceived as a "pro Russian" threat, but it isn't. Ukraine is claiming that it has killed the 2nd Russian general , this is being touted as evidence of a defeated Russian military. It isn't. thehill.com/policy/interna…
2) The Russians are having problems among its front line units. When this happens, senior officers should move to the front to deal with it. This can often fix things. It appears this is what the Russians are going.
3) Leading from the front isn't something a cowardly or incompetent commander does. Leading from the front means you risk dying at the front.
10) ... it makes sense the Russians will hold a line stretching south from the west of of Kiev down to somewhere along the Moldavian border (Transnistria). Or west of a line along the M05 highway. This would completely cut off Ukraine from the Black Sea, a strategic objective.
11) The M05 highway runs north-south from Kiev to Odesa. Again this is an operation that would take weeks or months to develop. But if Kiev falls this changes the timeline calculus.
12) Kiev is without a doubt a strategic objective for the Russians but by no means the only objective. A look at the RUSMIL offensive shows this operation was not launched in haste because Kiev didn't fall and Zelensky didn't capitulate on day 2.
1) A look at the military situation in eastern and central Ukraine, & around the capital of Kiev. This will use several maps, from @nytimes & @Bcc. First the overall picture, using map from @nytimes. The strategic situation for Ukrainian force in Kiev & to the east is not good.
@nytimes@Bcc 2) There hasn't been a lot of movement by the Russians overall (compared to the first week that is), however it appears the Russians are consolidating their positions, preparing/positioning, and moving with the goal of the encirclement of several key regions.
@nytimes@Bcc 3) Russian forces are moving to cut off the far eastern areas close to the Donbas region, both northeast of Mariupol, and east of Izyum.
1) This letter, calling for a "Limited No-Fly Zone" in Ukraine is shocking, given who has signed it. Former generals & ambassadors, current heads or members of think tanks or foundations. People who understand that this would mean war with Russia. politico.com/f/?id=0000017f…
2) Enforcing a no-fly zone would not only require shooting down Russian aircraft, but also targeting Russian ground units - surface to air missiles, antiaircraft batteries, radars... Some of this equipment would be based in Russia, as some systems extend out hundreds of miles.
3) There has been a lot of talk about "air superiority" - a term which is casually bandied about but poorly understood. If you want to enforce a no fly zone, you need to ensure Russian aircraft cannot fly, and that Russian SAMs, AA, radars, etc. can shoot down your planes.
1) From @caleb_weiss7's excellent report: "... the French military reports that the jihadist originally joined the Armed Islamic Group (GIA) in Algeria in 1994 before continuing the jihad with the GIA’s splinter group the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC) in 1998."
@caleb_weiss7 2) If you listen to Generation Jihad, you have heard this before. The important jihadists don't retire. They die of old age or in battle/raids. Abu Ammar al Jaza’iri was 2 years short of having 3 decades of front line experience.
@caleb_weiss7 3) There are plenty of "Abu Ammar al Jaza’iris" out there which we know nothing about. I recall reading one of Osama bin Laden's personnel files from circa 2006 which named up and coming leaders. Half of them became public figures, the other half were unknown to us.