A fascinating analysis by Hu Wei, a deputy director of the Public Policy Institute of the Chinese Government: Possible outcomes of #UkraineWar and China’s strategic choice. /thread
Putin is unlikely to meet his goals for the war (decapitating Zelensky quickly, making Ukraine client state, diverting attention from domestic problems) and Russia will be in a very difficult position. What he can’t achieve from war is harder to get from negotiation table…..
If the war escalates, it is likely to spill beyond Ukraine and even may draw in nuclear options as Putin warns. NATO will be involved and WWIII is possible. It will lead to a final showdown between the US and Russia. With NATO’s military superiority, Putin will lose….
If Putin uses all his resources to occupy Ukraine, it will be quagmire and a heavy economic burden. Fighting insurgencies and suffering under western sanctions, Russia’s economy will collapse in a few years
Anti-war forces and anti-Putin forces will likely overthrow Putin and Russia may even disintegrate further and no longer be a great power….
US will regain global leadership with a United western alliance, Germany will be integrated further into NATO defense framework, Europe will give up their plan of autonomous diplomacy and defense….
A new iron curtain will be set up, between democracies and dictatorships. A united West will attract other nations, America’s Indo-Pacific strategy will reinforced, Japan/Korea/Australia will follow it even closer. A world wide democratic united front will be formed….
China will be further isolated. With Putin’s downfall, US will focus on strategic competition with China, Europe will further decouple from China, Japan/Korea and others will be more hostile. China will face challenges/containment on all fronts: strategic, military, values..
China should not let its fate to be tied with Putin’s. It doesn’t have the resource to prop up Russia. There are no permanent friends or enemies, only permanent interest. It should discard Putin asap to protect its own interest right now, to choose the lesser of two evils…
China should drop the pretence of neutrality and start aligning with mainstream world opinion. The tight-rope-walking doesn’t sustain Russia but angers Ukraine and its supporters. Standing up for Ukraine’s sovereignty also helps China’s reunification claim with Taiwan.
Cutting ties with Putin will help improve China’s international standing and relations with the West, and avoid suffering secondary sanctions. China’s priority should be to find ways to reduce hostilities from the US, and get out of international isolation.
As a world power, China should do help stop a coming nuclear world war and maintain peace. Russia will be an international pariah for bringing nuclear disaster to the world and China should do everything it can do to deter Putin from going over the precipice /end thread
The article was posted on a website outside China. As some pointed out, repostings on various WeChat accounts have all been removed by censors, a hint where the official Chinese position is
I found another host of the article on WeChat. In sharing it I predicted it would be removed in two hours. I was right.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Chinese MFA spokesperson Twitter feed is a hilarious collection of chutzpath and brazen lack of self-awareness. The most "supremely ironic" part is the fact that China itself bans Tiktok and Twitter. The spokesperson has to use a VPN to tweet.
Chinese MFA spokesperson: "Tiktok is registered in accordance with the US's laws and subject to the US's regulation."
Also Chinese MFA spokesperson: "How dare the US lawmakers change its own laws to regulate TikTok?"
"While we are entitled to ban Tiktok and all major US social media platforms to serve the CCP's domestic political interest, the US "rules" and "order" should serve the whole world"
She is misleading her audience with the video. Let me summarise what actually happened (full video here ) 1. Brendan Kavanaugh, a youtube pianist, was streaming his performance at the King's Cross St Pancras station in London. youtube.com/live/65iwnI2hj…
2. A group of Chinese living in London, were making a segment for a Chinese TV outlet celebrating Chinese New Year. The outlet required them not to disclose the performance (perhaps for commercial reasons)
3. The group was waiting to use the public piano for their filming. Brendan was chatting with a guy who organized some activities for a Japanese outlet before and he thought they were Japanese. He invited them to join him.
Chinese nationalist media Guancha celebrates Victor Gao’s insult-laden appearance about Taiwan on Al Jazeera. Gao bragged about his law license in New York and disparaged the other panelist, an American professor, as not knowing history or law. Gap is actually wrong on both.
why does Guancha mask Al Jazeera’s logo from the video clip, stealing their content? This is the asymmetrical info warfare China is playing: their surrogates get on foreign media all the time pushing propaganda, but no foreign views contradicting Beijing can be heard in China
In case you wonder who Victor Gao is. He is the dude who claimed that Peng shuai could not have been sexually assaulted by CCP official because she was a strong athlete.
@YaleLawSch should be ashamed to have him as an alumnus
Comrade Andy claims that “no one tells me what to post”. That’s a lie. Gen Sec told Andy what to post, in no uncertain terms.
Gen Sec Xi clearly instructed Chinese media to "tell good China stories".
Comrade Cyrus did not do his homework well. Please submit self-criticism report.
Generally speaking PMs and Premiers should avoid directly critiquing their own colleagues on foreign policy when travelling abroad, especially in a country which holds two Australians in arbitrary detention and places numerous unfair trade sanctions on Australian products
This is basic political etiquette: as elected leaders, they represent ALL Australians, not just their own party, when visiting foreign countries on taxpayer funded trips. @MarkMcGowanMP could have simply said “there are diverse views in Aus on how to handle China relations”
Granted this is a hot mic moment talking to an Australian businessman, but still his own team sent out the video, on purpose.
Comrade @chenweihua, China Daily's reporter in Brussels, has tweeted many times about the Ohio derailment in which no one died, but remains quiet about the Beijing hospital fire which killed 29 patients. He only cares about white Americans.
Comrade Chen tweeted endlessly about abortion rights in the US, but has never ever for once condemned the brutal Chinese government policy of forced abortions for Chinese women. He only cares about rights of American women.
Comrade Chen tweeted endlessly about US "proxy war" in Ukraine against Russia, but has never ever for once condemned the actual aggressor in the Ukraine War, Russia.