Denison’s lab and its collaborators at the University of North Carolina (Baric) conducted the preclinical work showing that remdesivir could stop coronaviruses from replicating.
In Feb 2020, he was pretty clear that it should be given early.
Later in the Q&A he said about potential trials: "if we design it to just treat those who are in the ICU, on a ventilator, then we might as well not design the trial".
So Denison, in the presence of Ralf Baric, said it clearly: remdesivir should be given early or not at all. And yet we designed trials to give it late. Exactly how they knew it couldn't work. Why?
More on the Remdesivir Riddle here:
What you are seeing me do in the case of Ukraine is what I always try to: first principles thinking.
Allow me to summarize: 🧵
First of all, I don't have a position on the matter at all. It still appears too complex for me. I feel badly for the Ukrainian people suffering what they are, of course, as I feel for the Yemenis and Uighurs.
Second, the revelation on biolabs taught me to not ignore something, just because Putin said it.
Daszak interview with the intercept, un-paywalled link: archive.ph/4Kb55
Haven't read it yet, will probably turn this into a 🧵 as I go.
Ooh! He throws Baric under the bus, ever so gently.
Remember when Daszak emailed Baric and told him "I spoke with Linfa [Wang] last night"... "we'll then put it out in a way that doesn't link it back to our collaboration"
So, what are these Ukrainian biolabs? They appear to be run by a company called Metabiota.
The linked article has a *lot* of information I'd prefer to confirm more tightly first, but time is of the essence, so decide for yourselves: armswatch.com/the-pentagon-b…
So how did they do in Sierra Leone during the Ebola outbreak? CBS says.. not well. cbsnews.com/news/american-…
From lab leak to early treatment, and from transmission to lockdowns, the Lancet was always there to make some absolutely understandable errors, but always in the same direction.
1. Delayed letting the world know about human-to-human transmission.
Which is basically Kendi's agenda of an unelected body that can oversee every other institution and veto anything it determines will have unequal outcomes.
Phil Harper just had a major breakthrough in the investigation of the Andrew Hill meta-analysis.
The name of Andrew Owen, Prof at University of Liverpool and UNITAID grantee appears in the metadata of some digital versions of Andrew Hill's meta-analysis. philharper.substack.com/p/professor-ti…
Quote:"The person who allegedly edited the Andrew Hill paper on Ivermectin, is the person in receipt of consultancy fees from pharma with competing products, is the person who prepared the evidence base for the World Health Organisation to make their recommendation on Ιvermectin"
Subscribe to this man's substack if you can afford it.