1/🧵FAIL: RC-National Natural Disaster Arrangements
🌊Big disasters-no longer 'unprecedented'
🌊Upcoming floods-more than just houses inundated
🌊Shane Stone is remarkable
🌊Key new departments: 'Australian Climate Services' & 'National Resilience & Recovery Agency'
#Auspol
2/ The 2 new departments and the existing EMS make up the Liberal governments design for disaster management. Shown in the freshly minted disaster management document (1st created by Labor in 2012 as part of the 1st ever COAG disaster agreement).
3/ A bit more on that document.
Who updated a key document in the middle of 'storm/xmas season'. The document does not appear to have been given to or endorsed by the states.
4/ Given so much of the responsibility sits with the Commonwealth, it may not need endorsement (good idea to circulate though)
It is very clear what Minister is responsible, including who can declare Category A, B, C & D funding
5/ A quick look back at what Labor did, they created the first ever COAG National Partnership agreement for disaster resilience (COAG is what the Morrison govt removed and replaced with dodgy secret national Cabinet). ALP worked with all states and got funding/projects sorted.
6/ On the funding topic, Labor provided more funding for disaster resilience a decade ago, than what the Liberal government is providing now.
NOTE: The current government still haven't worked out what to do with that $4.8B Emergency Response Fund
7/ Now look at that brand new 'Australian Climate Service'. Not much to look at, the website has very little information. No phone numbers, no detail on what/how/when it will pull together real time data from 10 agencies. I wonder why the BOM wasn't chosen to do this?
8/ The ACS website gives a clue that it's an empty vessel. Only 1 'announcement' FB post by S Ley with an animation a 10 year old could make. Copy of vid on the last tweet in the thread. Govt directory has 1 F/T staff & unknown 'seconded' staff (Budgets don't mention any staff)
9/ This is a real doozy, in the Morrison governments response to the RC report, they restate the identified need for a unilateral power to declare an emergency. BUT, they keep the original recommendation to have 'a high threshold', LNP hate accountability so they dropped that.
10/ As @MurrayWatt & many others have pointed out, the declaration can be done without any involvement of the states and without any 'threshold test'.
It seems everyone but the media know this fact.
11/ The RC recommendations are being tracked in a spreadsheet. Tracking s/sheets usually have lists deliverables, not Scott Morrison who track the delivery to the 'Media Release'. As we have seen the Climate Service looks far from up and running, but it got announced✅🙄
12/ With the 🐂💩'National Cabinet' secrecy, we are clueless about government planning. Thanks to 1 page in the BOM annual report we can see they workshopped flooding in Lismore. Will they ever release the outputs from that workshop? If we knew would lives have been saved?
13/ Been posted before, but it's worth repeating. The ADF have played a role in disasters in Australia for many decades. The government's own website proudly details the role played in the 1974 cyclone in Darwin.
14/
All done, here is that appalling animation that accompanies the governments 'announcment' that they created the "Australian Climate Services". I think the ACS are even embarrased by it, they haven't put a copy on there own website or even a link to it.
#Auspol #AlboForPM

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AusPolMate Researched Threads & oddities

AusPolMate Researched Threads & oddities Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AusPolMate

May 16
1/ Coalition 70 seat minority government
My thoughts on how Dutton has pitched & wedged his budget to take a 70 seat minority govt.
Salient points;
1. Screw renewables, he has no intention of getting greens voters.
2. Re-use existing power plant locations will upset no one.
2/
3. Migrants & Foreign investors don't vote, so no downside.
This is the same as Greens strategy of protesting against things in places they'll never win.
An example is Greens Anti-Adani risks nothing as they'll never take Capricornia or mining towns.
#Auspol
3/
4. Emissions on RV's are perfect for Nationals electorates and reinforce the Greens/Labor coalition narrative News Corp/Liberal/National will keep driving home.
#Auspol
Read 6 tweets
Feb 29
1/ BREAKING LATEST EMISSIONS⬇️459Mt (YR 2 Dec)
Compared to Paris agreement:
➡️Started in 2005 @ 621Mt
➡️Target 354Mt vs Now 459Mt
➡️Target 43%⬇️2005 vs Now = 25.4%
#Auspol #Renewables
The Australian Labor party are the only party in Australia that has a fully modelled plan for how Australia will reach the Paris Agreement target. The Greens have no modelling and the Liberals don't believe in climate change.
Image
2/
Emission from electricity⬇️4.9%; (7.7 Mt CO2-e)
-Driver is more Renewables
Agriculture⬆️2.5%; (2.0 Mt CO2-e)
-Driver is bumper crops
Transport⬆️4.5%; (4.2 Mt CO2-e)
-Driver is post COVID recovery
Share of Emissions👇 Image
3/
Change in electricity generation in the NEM, trend, by fuel.
COAL & GAS are going⬇️down
Benefits from land use changes are tapering out
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 14, 2023
1/ My 10c on Rent Freeze Law -It's easy being Green.
The bill has no cost calculation or estimate.
It's inaccurate to describe the payment as being determined by the Minister. Obviously, the Minister can't determine that $1 is enough, so this section is logically impossible. Image
2/ Property Mgrs/Real-Estate companies will keep the fee while the landlords refund the tenants.
Landlords would need to refund money & redo their tax returns & may need to borrow money to finance the refunds. Image
3/ This will be a disincentive to improving the quality of the rental stock.
Landlords would not want the financial risk of capital improvements that are unable to be recouped.
Body Corporate improvements would become nearly impossible to resolve. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 28, 2023
1/ Greens Hypocrisy Busted:
📷Right: Greens using a 1 in 2,000 year flood model to protest against 855 new homes in Max's wealthy electorate. 855 homes lower values?
📷Left: Greens omits the flood model (I've added it back) from their plan for a new school & some public housing. Max Chandler-Mather lying by omission. The Greens are the ultimate NIMBY party. The Greens use a 1 in 2000 year flood model to discredit the proposed development and then propose an alternative use of the site while not mentioning or showing any flood impacts.
2/This is how the Greens present their plan.

Using just a tiny pocket of land to build some public housing & creating hectares of parkland would increase home values. The Greens @Greens and Max Chandler-Mather posting an alternative plan for the Bulimba Barracks site without using the flood map he used to discredit the existing development proposal.
3/
Here are Max's Facebook posts protesting against development on the old army land.
He doesn't mention the flood model is for a 1 in 2,000-year flood on the old undrained army land. Lies by omission by Max Chandler-Mather and the Greens. Using the 1 in 2000 year flood model but making the reader believe it shows an actual flood.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 8, 2023
1/ 🧵Vile Robodebt lies that live on.
If you’ve been told Labor started/pioneered/”laid the foundations” or in any way was involved with Robodebt you have been told a vile lie.
If you are posting this information, then you are lying.
This thread busts these absurd lies.
2/
NO, Data Matching was NOT started by Shorten/Plibersek & Data Matching is NOT Robodebt .
Data Matching has been undertaken for over 50 years.

The 1975/76 DSS Annual Report👇includes details of data matching for fraud detection.
3/
There is some evidence that parliament was using data matching in 1968. During a debate on conscription, this astute politician warned that the use of machines may apply harsh & substantial laws to an individual and destroy their rights.
Read 18 tweets
Jun 25, 2023
1/ 🧵Greens Housing Policy
A fund by any other name would smell of hypocrisy.
Trust/Fund:
Greens will create a Housing Trust. Sounds similar to a Future Fund, but ministers will have direct control.
Same indirect funding:
States, councils, community housing providers etc.
2/
Labor already has a shared equity scheme.
Interestingly the Greens think houses will cost $300K to build or buy. This will likely limit any new housing to the far reaches of cities. Sounds like a recipe for high-pollution transit and a lack of employment
3/
Greens are literally quoting the existing HAFF. NHFIC is what began in 2018 and had a 5-year life. ALP has extended it by 1 year.
This means greens refer to a fund that raises equity by issuing bonds, etc. Funny how they say they hate this
HAFF is bigger & better than NHFIC
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(