This is an incredible analysis of how Putin's invasion of the world will re-order the global world, largely for the better. By a leading Chinese policy thinker, in Shanghai, originally written in Chinese. Brief thread, but read the whole thing. uscnpm.org/2022/03/12/hu-… 1/
Hu Wei is the vice-chairman of the Public Policy Research Center of the Counselor’s Office of the State Council, the chairman of Shanghai Public Policy Research Association, the chairman of the Academic Committee of the Chahar Institute, a professor, and a doctoral supervisor. 2/
He writes that Putin's invasion of Ukraine will lead to: 1. Possibly an escalation of the war beyond Ukraine. 2. Certainly Putin's degeat. 3. The United States regaining leadership in the Western world, and the West being more united.
3/
4. A new "Iron Curtain" falling globally, this time dividing democracies from authoritarian regimes, and extending into Asia.
4/
5. Growth in the power of the West, in both military strength and the strength and importance of western institutions. Greater hard power and soft. 5/
6. Further isolation of China, as the US, Europe, and also Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Australia turn against China.
"China will not only be encircled militarily ... but also challenged by Western values and systems." 6/
He closes by saying that China has 1-2 WEEKS in which to make a choice. And basically says that China should choose the West, and use its influence over Putin to end the war and bring him to heel. It says that China is the only nation that can. I don't disagree. 7/
The whole thing is incredible, and very clearly argued. Read the whole thing here in the English translation. It's not more than a 10 minute read. uscnpm.org/2022/03/12/hu-…
The original Chinese text is on the same page (link at the bottom). Remember, this is written by a senior Chinese policy thinker in Shanghai. It's incredible. /fin
Naturally I found one typo and one error in use of words in this thread right after posting it. Grrr, @Twitter, when will you let me fix these? <ironically raised fist>
Postscript: 1. The original article by Hu Wei has been censored inside of China. 2. Another Chinese policy thinker has published a rebuttal. (mp.weixin.qq.com/s/WCcXCEGZdsqL…)
Put together, these suggest that Xi and China are unlikely to listen to this advice, and will back Putin. PS1/
Postscript 3: This points out that Hu Wei's article was published by the US Carter Center & that there's no chance his advice will be taken by China. I largely agree with Hu Wei's analysis. I also agree that Xi is ignoring it. China is choosing Putin. zububrothers.com/2022/03/13/don… PS3/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Aleppo is one of the oldest cities in the world, with evidence of people living there since 5,000 BCE. It sounds amazing. I want to visit it. One day, when Syria is free (let's hope) I intend to. 2/
Thread of threads on how the US and Europe can advance energy policy to weaken Putin and reduce his leverage over Europe and the US. First, here's the US policy response we could have now. (1/n)
This energy bill to weaken Putin and reduce his leverage on the US and Europe can be passed through reconciliation and be filibuster-proof, if necessary. (2/n)
Thread. Two large, sophisticated, data-driven analysis of the genetics and location of early Covid cases in Wuhan find that it's extremely likely that Covid crossed over from animals at the market. At least twice. 1/n nyti.ms/3vkjo15
"“When you look at all of the evidence together, it’s an extraordinarily clear picture that the pandemic started at the Huanan market,” said Michael Worobey, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Arizona and a co-author of both new studies." 2/n
This probabalistic analysis of early Covid spread doesn't produce a smoking gun. But it is much more consistent with spread from animals to humans in the Wuhan market than it is with a lab leak origin. 3/n
I think there's a high risk that what Putin is doing by threatening Ukraine will backfire on him. Short thread.
1. Putin bet that NATO wouldn't come together. But Biden has done a remarkable job pulling the alliance back together. 1/5
2. Putin believes he has a gas weapon against Europe, but his threats - let alone an invasion - will only accelerate Europe finding alternatives to Russian gas.
2/5
3. If Putin backs down now (the best for everyone) he loses. He's strengthened NATO and Biden. He's probably accelerated Europe finding alternatives to Russian gas.
3/5
Of all the ecological impacts of climate change, the one that scares me the most is the loss of coral reefs. New research suggests this could happen much earlier than we thought (at 1.5C of warming, or ~20 years from now, rather than at 2C of warming). phys.org/news/2022-02-c… /1
Coral reef systems are the "rainforests of the sea", hosting an estimated 25% of the biodiversity in the oceans. They also provide the protein (fish) that roughly 500 million people depend on. Theyn protect coastal areas from storms and erosion. And they're beautiful. 2/
Previously we were thought that corals would be almost wiped out by 2C of warming. This new research uses higher resolution modeling to find that even at 1.5C of warming, most reefs would be exposed to heat-driven bleaching events too often to recover. phys.org/news/2022-02-c… 3/
Ketan is correct here. For all the optimism in the slides I shared yesterday, we are not moving at the speed required to stay below 1.5C of warming. Staying below 2C of warming is still doable, but requires concerted action. I would place our current path as 2-2.5C. 1/n
Even net zero by 2050 looks daunting (though within our power to achieve). If I were to look at our technical & policy progress, I see us being able to achieve something close to SSP 4-3.4: Cutting emissions in half by 2050, and to zero by 2080. Worst case- IMHO is SSP2-4.5. 3/n