"Did Putin’s 2007 Munich Speech Predict the Ukraine Crisis?
Putin’s Munich speech was an important diplomatic warning to the United States and its allies that Russia’s patience with NATO’s encroachment was at an end cato.org/commentary/did… via @CatoInstitute
2/Putin lays out in completely rational terms Russia's views & concerns about NATO expansion: "An especially pointed warning came when Putin addressed the annual Munich Security Conference on March 10, 2007. He took direct aim at the notion so popular in the United States during
3/"the 1990s and early 2000s that the international system was unipolar and that Washington’s power was unchallengeable…
“NATO has put its frontline forces on our borders,” although as yet, we “do not react to these actions at all.” NATO expansion, he stated, “represents a
4/"serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have the right to ask: against whom is this expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances our western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact?”"
5/Putin says in his Munich Speech: "“However one might embellish this term, at the end of the day it refers to one type of situation, namely one centre of authority, one centre of force, one centre of decision‐ making. It is a world in which there is one master, one sovereign.”
6/"Putin emphatically rejected that model. Implicitly referring to the U.S.-led military interventions in the Balkans and Iraq, he stated: “Today we are witnessing an almost uncontained hyper use of force — military force — in international relations, force that is plunging the
7/"world into an abyss of permanent conflicts.” “And of course,” Putin continued, “this is extremely dangerous. It results in the fact that no one feels safe. I want to emphasize this — no one feels safe!”"
One word describes Putin's perceptions & concerns
8/The failure of NATO & the US to heed Russia's protestations over NATO expansion & legitimate security concerns OVER THE DECADES ultimately wore Russia's patience out. Ignoring or arrogantly dismissing Russia's contention that "one centre of authority, one centre of force, one
9/"centre of decision‐making [where] there is one master, one sovereign" (NATO), whose #1 stated adversary is Russia was an egregious dereliction in diplomatic relations. It became untenable to the Russian Federation and finally Putin acted. There is no escaping this truth.
10/The capitulation to the fallacy that: "Putin is a madman. He has always wanted to restore Russia to it's former imperial borders. He won't stop at Ukraine. The Baltics, Romania & Poland are next..." is a psychologic retreat into rationalization decoupled from reason employed
11/as a buffer against reality. The views, then, of Kasparov and Lindsey Graham are heavily subjective, based upon belief, wrong perceptions, misunderstanding, emotion & failure to use critical thinking or logical analysis.
12/Russia warned the West that the buck of NATO stops at Ukraine. The West dismissed Russia's warnings. Russia's perceptions, fears & mistrust of NATO & the US led it to taking action to ensure Ukraine never joins NATO one way or another. And the world is now paying the price.
@JordisonPhilip@threadreaderapp Every country must, and should, prioritize defense. NATO is primarily a defense against Russia. Russia gets that, but NATO's eastward expansion over DECADES appears to have finally become untenable to Russia. Russia has the right to defend itself against NATO no? The red line for
@JordisonPhilip@threadreaderapp Russia in the NATO-Russia polarity has been NATO's ability to strike Moscow in closer and closer proximity. The NATO defense system in Romania👇could be used as to offensive launch missiles against Russia in a military conflict. THAT IS FACT.
@JordisonPhilip@threadreaderapp There's no sweeping this FACT under the rug of "They are purely defensive systems". Russia is acting towards Ukraine the same way the US would/did if Russia parked its missiles in Cuba. Explain how there's any difference. Russia had a choice: Do nothing (which could lead to
Russia: Buck Of NATO Expansion Stops In Ukraine:
Did Putin’s 2007 Munich Speech Predict the Ukraine Crisis?
Putin’s Munich speech was an important diplomatic warning to the U.S. and its allies that Russia’s patience with NATO’s encroachment was at an end threadreaderapp.com/thread/1503039…
3/It appears that Russia is ensuring Ukraine never joins NATO, one way or another. Call it "demands", an ultimatum or a choice, Zelensky could've ended the conflict if he agreed to these conditions 👇.
Note: THESE ARE THE CONDITIONS THAT RUSSIA WANTS THAT'D END THE CONFLICT.
“"We predicted speculation that Russia plans to restore (its) empire within imperial borders," Putin said at a meeting with Azerbaijan's President Ilham Aliyev in the Kremlin, adding: "This absolutely does not correspond w/ reality."”
I find this credible. themoscowtimes.com/2022/02/22/put…
2/Gary Kasparov, Lindsey Graham & many others on the other hand have a religious-like conviction that this is Putin’s goal based on a misreading of reality. You can’t dismis Putin’s words ☝️by just saying: “He’s a madman, he lies, you can’t trust anything he says.” Putin has a
Going back to his 2007 Munich Speech Putin has warned NATO & the US that Russia will never allow Ukraine to join NATO. In his hour-long televised speech he went into explicit detail delineating Russia's reasons, concerns & perceptions.
Twitter bans Trump but accepts Putin. COLLUSION!! Putin has compromat on Twitter! 😉
“Vladimir Putin: Go ahead, please.
Sergei Shoigu: We are receiving a huge number of requests from all manner of volunteers from different countries, who would like to en.kremlin.ru/events/preside…
2/“come to the Lugansk and Donetsk people’s republics to take part in the liberation movement, as they say. The largest number of requests, over 16,000, has come from the Middle East. We believe that we should grant these requests, especially since the matter does not concern
3/“money but a genuine desire of these people. We know many of them; they helped us fight ISIS in the most difficult period, during the past 10 years. This is the first point.
The second, Mr President. In light of the uncontrollable arms deliveries to Ukraine from all parties
I've reached the conclusion that the Biden Administration is simply energy illiterate. The crusade towards a "fossil fuel-free America" driven by climate change alarmists on the left w/ belief & 'blind faith' is divorced from the real world. This chart👇
2/will change at a very slow pace. The real questions is at what rate will the green renewable energy sector👇increase per year under the Green New Deal, and projected in 10 years from now? Since Biden wants to see the petroleum, natural gas & coal sectors vanish (just a mere 80%
3/of the pie chart) what will fill the void? That's like taking a pizza cut into 5 slices and removing 4 leaving 1. 1 slice (20% of grid energy) just isn't enough to go around. Green energy won't exponentially increase overnight, it'll take a decades. WH & Psaki don't get this.
2/"Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he had "cooled down" about Ukraine's bid to join NATO.
He said his mindset changed "after we understood that NATO is not prepared to accept Ukraine."
Zelensky added: "The alliance is afraid of controversial things and
3/"confrontation with Russia.
In addition to his NATO comments, Zelensky said on Tuesday that he was open to discussions about the control of Russian-backed separatist regions in eastern Ukraine, which could be an opening for peace talks with Russia.