Here's a (partial) guide on how to identify Russian military Air Defense losses in Ukraine. It will be a two part series, focusing on the Tor and Buk systems respectively.
This is part two, Buk.
1/25
Russian Air Defense systems are usually composed of smaller units/sub-systems, Buk is no different. From my understanding, its combat vehicle can work independently if need be, but it usually does not. I will focus on battalion-level Buk systems.
2/25
Buk variants (or a part of them) that are known to be active in Ukraine are:
- 9K37M1 Buk-M1
- 9K37M1-2 Buk-M1-2
- 9K317 Buk-M2
- 9K317M Buk-M3
3/25
<9K37M1 Buk-M1>
A Buk-M1 battalion with three batteries consists of the following sub-systems:
- 6 road wheels;
- 9S35(M1) Fire Dome fire control and engagement radar;
- 9М38M1 missiles (4x).
This TELAR is in service with Ukraine and Russia. A Russian-fired 9M38M1 missile was used to down MH17 in 2014
5/25
<Buk-M1, 9A39M1 TEL>
Attributes of the 9A39M1 TELAR are:
- 6 roadwheels;
- In case it's a TEL for Buk-M1 it's armed with 9М38M1 missiles (8x, 4x ready-to-fire).
6/25
<Buk-M1, 9S18M1(-1) radar>
- 6 roadwheels;
- fairly generic looking search radar, nothing fancy to be frank.
- I don't know how to differentiate the 9S18M1 and 9S18M1-1...Any input is welcome for this.
7/25
<Buk-M1, 9S470M1 Battalion command post>
- 6 road wheels;
- Mast for communication with 9S18M1(-1) and other brigade and battalion-level assets;
- Generic C2 vehicle look.
8/25
<9K37M1-2 Buk-M1-2>
A Buk-M1-2 consists of the following sub-systems:
- 9М38M1 or 9M317 missiles;
- 9A310M1-2 TELAR;
- 9A39M1 TEL;
- 9S18M1(-1 or -2) Search and Acquisition Radar;
- 9S470M1(-2) BN C2.
9/25
<Buk-M1-2, 9A310M1-2 TELAR>
- 6 road wheels;
- 9S35(M1) Fire Dome fire control and engagement radar;
- 9М38M1 or 9M317 missiles (4x).
A general rule of thumb should be, if you see a TELAR with a Fire Dome radar and with 9M317 missiles, know it's a 9A310M1-2 of Buk-M1-2.
10/25
<Buk-M1-2, 9A39M1 TEL>
From my understanding, Buk-M1-2 uses the same TEL as Buk-M1. I suspect the 9A39M1 TEL can manipulate and handle both 9M38M1 and the modern 9M317 missiles.
Here are the two missiles side-by-side. 9M38M1 (pic 1) has longer canard surfaces.
11/25
<Buk-M1-2, 9S18M1(-1 or -2) and 9S470M1(-2)>
I can't find jack on these. I'm uncertain if the 9S18M1-2 and 9S470M1-2 even exist for Buk-M1-2. If they do, I highly doubt they look much different from the original 9S18M1 and 9S470M1 of Buk-M1.
12/25
<9K317 Buk-M2>
A Buk-M2 consists of the following sub-systems:
- 9M317 missiles;
- 9A317 TELAR;
- 9A316 TEL;
- 9S18M1(-2 or -3?) Search and Acquisition Radar;
- 9S36 illumination and engagement Radar;
- 9S510 BN C2.
13/25
<Buk-M2, 9A317 TELAR>
Attributes of the 9A317 TELAR are:
- 6 road wheels;
- 9S36 fire control and engagement radar;
- 9A317 missiles (4x).
The older mechanically steered 9S35 is replaced with the more modern 9S36!!
14/25
<Buk-M2, 9A316 TEL>
I cannot for the life of me find psychical differences between 9A316 TEL of Buk-M2 and the 9A39M1 TEL of Buk-M1-2. Both look identical and handle 9M317 missiles. Pictured are 9A316 TEL of Buk-M2.
15/25
<Buk-M2, 9S18M1(-2 or -3?)>
I've seen this radar system be referred to as both 9S18M1-2 and 9S18M-3. I am not sure what sets it apart externally from 9S18M1(-1)
16/25
<Buk-M2, 9S36>
As you've read before, the 9A317 TELAR of Buk-M2 has a 9S36 radar for fire control and engagement. Within Buk-M2 a stand-alone, mast mounted, 9S36 was introduced. It's to engage low-flying targets. It's a generic 6-wheeled chassis with a 21-meter mast.
17/25
<Buk-M2, 9S510 BN C2>
Previous Buk systems has 9S470M1-series, Buk-M2 introduced the more modern 9S510. I've seen it sometimes be referred to as 9S470M1-2... so yeah.
It's near identical externally to the 9S470M1-series.
18/25
<9K317M Buk-M3>
A Buk-M3 consists of the following sub-systems, and everything is very distinct:
- 9M317M missiles in canisters(!);
- 9A317M TELAR;
- 9A316M TEL;
- 9S18M1-3 Search and Acquisition Radar;
- 9S36M illumination and engagement Radar;
- 9S510M BN C2.
19/25
<Buk-M3, 9A317M TELAR>
Attributes of the 9A317M TELAR are:
- 7 road wheels;
- APU
- New fire control and engagement radar, I believe called S36M;
- 9M317M missiles (6x!).
This TELAR looks very distinct and different. You can't confuse it.
20/25
<Buk-M3, 9A316M TEL>
Attributes of the 9A316M TEL are:
- 7 road wheels;
- 9M317M-series missiles (8x!).
Again, very distinct and different, like most Buk-M3 systems.
21/25
<Buk-M3, 9S18M1-3>
Oh yeah, this one is good, very clear and distinct. It's attributes are:
- 7 road wheels;
- APU;
- Still very generic search radar shape, like previous 9S18M1-series.
At least one was lost in combat in Ukraine.
22/25
<Buk-M3, 9S36M>
Again, used for pesky low flying targets, like 9S36 in Buk-M2 system. Attributes are:
- 7 road wheels;
- improved 9S36(M) radar
- APU.
23/25
<Buk-M3, 9S510M>
Looks externally very much like a 9S510 or 9S470M1-series, but comes with 7 wheels and APU.
24/25
Please, correct me if I've made any mistakes and try fill in the gaps. Any and all input is welcome!
25/25, END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Russian air defenses at Belgorod airport failed marvelously today. What appears to be the SAM-launcher itself got struck directly, perhaps a TELAR struck by HARM.
White smoke clouds can be indicative of rocket fuel going ablaze. But I'm not seeing the "sparks", in conjunction with white smoke, usually associated with their detonation.
However, they still appear to be rather accurate for solely GNSS (+INS or IMU) guided munitions.
Perhaps they both, or just the larger shahed-136, possess a small radar transceiver for terminal homing. Given the accuracy and ability to hit such a pillar.
Looks like the Ukrainians retrofitted an S-60 anti-aircraft artillery gun with a siemens simatic control panel.
Notice the arrows on the four lower buttons. They likely actuate the gun, moving it up, down, left, right. Likely by means of some hydraulic actuators and a PLC. Nice.
This is very clever, perhaps overkill when manual actuation is also possible (notice all the wheels and cranks), but still very clever and cool. I love it!
Also notice some kind of joy-stick/controller, an generator/battery, a possible optical sight, and ear-pro!
This old piece of weaponary was modernized quite cleverly, probably used for indirect fire support. This is fucking awesome!
TASS and other Russian channels are lying cunts. The original S-400 deal signed back on April 11, 2017 was to include two squadrons consisting of four 'batteries' (rather battalions) with eight TEL, two radars and one command post each. savunmasanayist.com/bakan-cavusogl…
In 2019, Turkey received all the equipment and weaponary to arm two battalions, so one Squadron.
Based on OSINT this can be concluded, they have enough radars and TEL to arm ONE squadron. The second squadron was supposed to be delivered in 2020, but that never happened (I think)
The 2020 deliveries of the second squadron might have been postponed due to technology transfer disputes, or so it's specualted. What the actual reason is, is unknown from my understanding.
"U.K. Royal Navy destroyer HMS Defender, USS Laboon and Dutch frigate HMNLS Evertsen take station for close proximity sailing as a Russian warship watches from afar (rear of picture) in the Black Sea on June 17, 2021. US Navy Photo"
Since then, the Black Sea Fleet has lost its flagship missile cruiser Moskva, one Alligator-class LST, one Rescue Tug, and multiple raptor-class patrol boats...:)
"In twenty-seven of thirty-three engagements against fixed wing aircraft (82%), AWACS provided target information and identification before U.S. fighters detected enemy aircraft." Gulf War 1991.
"Crowd-funded Yaesu and Baofeng radios." Special Military Operation 2022.
Jokes aside, Russian Su-25SM3 and Su-34 pilots are literally using US-made civilian grade GPS systems and unencrypted civilian radios to perform ground attack missions.