(1) The scale of the sanctions is unprecedented—and the single most significant sanction is the one that targets the Central Bank of Russia. To picture the scale, the CBR has roughly $640b in assets; whereas, at its peak in the early 2010s, Iran's entire GDP was around $550b.
(2) Putin almost definitely did not anticipate sanctions of this scale. The best evidence is that Moscow left a lot of its assets exposed—around 2/3 of the CBR's assets are denominated in G7 currencies. Deterrence may have failed because Putin underestimated the West.
(3) These sanctions were made possible by three main factors. First, Ukraine put up much stiffer resistance to Russia's invasion than anyone expected, winning the hearts and minds of the world. By denying Putin a blitzkrieg victory, Ukraine inspired the West to push back hard.
(4) Second, European opinion shifted dramatically after the invasion. Many (myself included) expected the EU to be laggards on sanctions. Instead, Putin's war shook Europe to the core, building political support for heavy sanctions—even though they would be costly for Europe.
(5) Third, early warning of Putin's invasion gave the West months to prepare and vet a menu of sanctions options. Since last fall, the G7 has been intensively coordinating sanctions. That's why they were ready as soon as Putin ordered tanks to roll (a big difference from 2014).
(6) While sanctions are unprecedented in scale, they're not yet comprehensive. The West retains ample room to increase pressure, if needed. Most significant, the West could impose an Iran-style pressure campaign on Russia's oil sales, reducing exports and locking funds offshore.
(7) The West could also expand full-blocking sanctions to additional Russian banks, including Sberbank (which is by far Russia's largest), as well as to non-financial state-owned enterprises across the energy, defense, mining, transport, shipping, and telecommunications sectors.
(8) Will China be Putin's white knight? I'm skeptical. Yes, Beijing will exploit the situation to advance its interests. But I doubt Beijing wants to be perceived as bankrolling Putin's imperialism. And a Sino-Russian alternative to the global financial system is a pipe dream.
(9) Will all this pressure change Putin's calculus? Sadly, it probably won't. But it does give Putin a powerful reason (in addition to Ukraine's tough resistance) to cut a deal. Even if Putin persists, sanctions remain valuable as they'll degrade Putin's capacity to do more harm.
(10) If Putin continues the war, Russia will become "North Korea on the Volga"—a pariah that is isolated economically and politically. This will be terrible for the Russian people, who deserve better. It's no cause for celebration. But right now, it's the likeliest outcome. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Putin's war shows no sign of letting up. It's time to impose sanctions on the lifeblood of Russia's economy: Oil
Oil is the weak spot in the pressure campaign. It doesn't have to be.
Here's how the US & Europe can cut Russian oil sales while limiting adverse side effects (🧵):
(1) First things first: Russia's economy is heavily dependent on oil sales. Russia exports 5m barrels of oil per day. This accounts for roughly half of Russia's export revenues—by far Russia's largest source of cash. Oil adds >$100b to the Kremlin's coffers each year.
(2) The West has avoided targeting Russia's oil sales for two reasons: first, concerns about spiking domestic gasoline prices; second, if oil prices ⬆️ by more than Russia's sales ⬇️, sanctions could perversely benefit Moscow, as it could earn more cash selling less oil.
The US just unveiled the details of its sanctions against the Central Bank of Russia. Bottom line: This is close to the most ambitious form that this action could take. Here's my initial analysis (🧵):
(1) As I explained on Saturday, the joint statement hinted at limited sanctions against the CBR. Not blocking sanctions (i.e., asset freeze and transaction ban), but something more scalpel-like to prevent the CBR from undermining other sanctions.
(2) Then, Ursula von der Leyen, European Commission president, dropped a bombshell, saying sanctions would "paralyze the assets of Russia’s central bank" & "freeze its transactions." To my ear, this sounded a lot like blocking sanctions—the strongest sanctions tool we have.
The US, EU, Canada, & the UK just released a joint statement committing to several major sanctions actions, including a SWIFT ban and restrictions on the Central Bank of Russia. This is a big deal, but details will matter. Here's my initial analysis (🧵): ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…
(1) On SWIFT, the allies committed to remove "selected" Russian banks from SWIFT. This is a good move. It means that the allies will couple blocking sanctions with targeted SWIFT bans. Only banks that are sanctioned will be blocked from SWIFT. It will not be a blanket SWIFT ban.
What will I be watching for? The names of the "selected" banks. If the banks include the big fish—Sberbank, VTB, and Gazprombank—this is an absolutely huge deal. Let's wait and see.
As Russian forces move on Kyiv, it's time to get serious about ratcheting sanctions up a notch. The US and Europe have ample room for escalation. A few thoughts on the option set (🧵):
(1) So far, the sanctions effort has focused on Russia's state-owned banks. But only one major bank—VTB—has been fully blocked. A next wave of sanctions could involve full-blocking sanctions against Sberbank, Gazprombank, and other major Russian financial institutions.
(2) There has been a lot of talk about SWIFT. First things first: it is the EU, not the US, that has the authority to cut Russian banks off from SWIFT. All the US can do is apply pressure and persuasion to make that happen. Cutting Russian banks off from SWIFT ...
Putin's unprovoked war against Ukraine is a crime against humanity. No sanctions can be proportional to the violence wrought upon Ukraine. The least the West can do is impose "swift and severe consequences" as @POTUS has promised.
A few thoughts on what this should look like:
(1) Step 1 should be a hammer blow against Russia's financial sector. What does that mean? Full-blocking sanctions against all major state-owned Russian banks. VEB, targeted on Tuesday, is the fifth-largest Russian financial institution. Sanctions on the others should follow.
(2) The reason the financial sector is target #1 is because oil markets are tight right now. Aggressive sanctions on Russia's oil sector could spike oil prices, perversely benefiting Russia. That said, this doesn't mean the oil sector should be off the table (more on this later).
What do today's first wave of US sanctions mean? A short 🧵 ...
(1) The US imposed full-blocking sanctions on VEB, the fifth-largest Russian financial institution. VEB serves as a policy instrument of the Russian state. Why does this matter? It's the first time the US has used its toughest sanctions tool on a major state-owned Russian bank.
(2) The use of full-blocking sanctions against VEB represents a step change from where we were in 2014. What does it signal? That the Biden administration is prepared to use this tool against other state-owned Russian banks, including even larger ones, if conditions warrant it.