I am positive that is not all of the times I've messed up and had to apologize.
I'm human.
That said, apologizing is only hard if you can't admit mistakes. If you can admit error (even of it makes you look bad, and all these examples make me look awful) then it's easy.
13/ So now that I've tweeted out a lot of things my enemies can use agaonst me, I'm going to go about my day as my mentions become chaotic
👍👍👍
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
3/ Don't let yourself be nitpicked by pedants who are trying to make you look bad. Also, don't become that person.
Don't try to force people into you frame of reasoning by giving tearse answers and demanding they parse your point on your terms so they have to adopt your frame...
2/ There are others, but I can't deal with all of them, so I will limit myself to those three. I shall attempt to answer each of them in turn, with the idea that each leads into the next.
I hope that I am able to clearly articulate why I disagree with each.
Let's begin...
3/ The first critique is:
1. @wokal_distance misrepresented (and misunderstood) Jonathan Culler when quoting him in the piece.
Before I begin my response, here is @KSPrior making that claim in her own words:
1/ From behind a block Karen Swallows Prior accused me of googling the Jonathan Culler I used in my article in Jesus and John Wayne.
I want to touch on something here, because this tells us a LOT about @KSPrior and the way she engages.
So briefly....
2/ My piece quotes a John Searle article called "The Word Turned Upside Down" several times. The Culler quote @KSPrior accused me of "obviously googling" can also be found there. I'd have cited Searle's piece for the quote but he used it differently than me, so I cited Culler...
3/ I have read Culler's book and so while I was reading Searle's review and saw that quote, I remembered that I thought it would be an absolutely terrific quote to use to set up the final line of my piece.
Now, here is the point, and I want you to pay very close attention:
1/ This is how "wokeness" (postmodernism + Critical Theory) is collapsing our society: not from the top down, but from the bottom up.
The top dominos are the last ones to fall...inertia leaves them suspeneded in mid-air until the ones directly beneath them fall...
2/ The bottom dominos are things like truth, reason, merit, objective moral standards, individual rights, and the nuclear family.
The top dominos are things like peace, order, beautiful art, innovation, democracy, fairness, properly functioning institutions, and wealth.
3/ It takes time for the dominos at the top to fall. It doesn't happen all at once.
As the woke use postmodernism and critical theory to destroy the foundational societal dominos (merit, reason, objective truth), the dominos of society collapse from the bottom up...
In that converstion Neil says he focuses on bad models for accountibility/transparancy because often anyone who disagrees with a position gets called racist (pic 1).