Thread on Russian perception of "Nazism". -- 1. For Russian propaganda, "Nazi" equals to national; every national movement opposing to Russian assimilation, is called "Nazi" 1/
Being Ukrainian, speaking Ukrainian language, supporting it, is already sign of "Nazism" or "Banderism". 2/
Same with other nations, for example Crimean Tatars or even Belarusians 3/
Everything in Ukrainian identity which is different from Russian, is called "Nazi"; all which is similar, is called Russian. In the eyes of Russians, Ukrainians can only be either a) Russians, or b) Nazi 4/
This means that, for Russian prop, Ukrainians don't have a right to exist. Either they are Russians, thus having no cultural right to exist, or they are Nazi, thus having no moral right to exist 5/
Before WWII Russian propaganda also portrayed Ukrainians as either a) traitors (Mazepa / Petliura followers) or b) cruel bandits. After Mazepa / Petliura they started using the image of Bandera, calling "Banderovtsy" every Ukrainian willing to stay Ukrainian 6/
By fighting against "Nazism" Russians are actually displaying the worst forms of far-right Russian nationalism denying the right to existence to whole nations like Ukrainians 7/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: Russian nazism has many common traits with German nazism, but some important differences. German nazism resulted from a fear of the Other becoming increasingly like you and "destroying" you ("arians") from within. This is the key neurosis of Nazi anti-semitism 1/6
Russian nazism is different: it doesn't stress the otherness, it stresses the sameness. It believes Ukrainians and Belarussians are the same as Russians, therefore all "deviations" should be brutally exterminated 2/6
While German nazism was afraid of the Other becoming same as you, Russian nazism is afraid of "same as you" becoming the Other - i.e. Ukrainians, Belarussians etc 3/6
THREAD on Ukraine's 20th century history in a global context. This can help understand current events. -- 1) one of possible lenses to look at 20th century history is to see it as struggle between various phantasies to build continental empires. Primarily German and Russian
2) Early 20th century "geopolitics" (Mackinder, Haushofer et al) was obsessed with an idea of Eurasia. Who controls Eurasia, controls the world, it believed. Who controls Eastern Europe, controls Eurasia.
3) Continental empires saw themselves as competitors to the 19th century maritime empires (Britain, France etc) and were dreaming on vast new geopolitical projects which would challenge domination of these maritime empires
a thread to understand what's going on: think of Russia as postmodern fascist state, a mix of Mussolini and Baudrillard. This means: a) there's no society or individuals, only state, which subjugates all, b) there's no reality, only virtual image which subjugates facts
Kremlin's key enemy is the reality itself. It tries to be ahead of reality and playing with the reality as if it is a computer game - with only difference that they play with real people and their lives and destinies
they use "evacuation of orphans" to get an virtual image of a horrible aggressive Ukraine. They deport people to get an image of "refugees" who flee. They make "terrorist acts" against their own hostages and invite their "media" to get an image of Ukrainian attack.
Thread on Russian colonialism. 1. It is different from maritime colonialism of European empires. In the latter, the colonized were substantially different from colonizers. In the Russian colonialism of East. Europe the colonized were often NOT too different from the colonizer
2. Maritime empires constructed an image of the "otherness" of the colonized. Russian continental empire constructed an idea of the "sameness" of the colonized. This legitimized politics of assimilation
3. The politics of assimilation suggested that the colonized are inferior beings, but they have a chance to become true humans if they reject their identity (linguistic, cultural, ethnic, religious). You could join the ruling nation / ruling class through amnesia