"What tips would you give to coaches just starting out?"
A brief thread 👇
1/ Relentlessly pursue experience with World Class coaches/teams.
My coaching certifications/qualifications, heck even my 6 years in University, pales into insignificance when compared to what I learned from my time with World Class coaches. Get it at all costs. It's worth it.
2/ Know your history
There is a lot of crap out there right now in the way of training manuals, texts, scientific studies &, IMO, many the best resources were written years ago.
Study Lydiard, study Carlile, study Counsilman, study Matveyev, study Bompa. They are full of gems!
3/ Get to know (and use!) blood lactate testing.
Much of what we do as endurance sports coaches is manipulate training to cause positive physiological changes. Lactate provides the coach with a 'window' into each athlete's physiology that they can monitor over time.
For the same reasons as 3/ HRV provides the coach with an easy window into the athlete's recovery state. While lactate provides a great window into fitness, HRV provides a window into fatigue.
5/ Learn to code! Or, at the very least, get some data skills!
To treat athletes as individuals, you have to be able ingest data quickly, efficiently and systematically and know how it compares to *their* norms.
This is easy to do providing the coach has some basic data skills
6/ Set your standards/expectations for each level of coaching.
Every athlete can benefit from coaching of some form, but sport will play a different role in each athlete's life. Your attitude, & the attitude of the athlete, and your expectations/demands should scale accordingly
7/ Let me preempt 'where are the people skills?' with:
Find *your* people!
Be selective. Take on athletes you gel with & you know you can help! We're not a great fit for everyone & that's OK! Your coaching experience (& your life) will be better if you stick with *your* people
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Following the "10%/wk" rule of thumb is a sure-fire road to injury. I prescribe no more than ~10% per *month* increase in volume for the athletes I work with.
2/ Under-eating(!)
In serious runners, the *number one* factor most linked to frequent injuries, in my experience, is under-eating relative to the training load.
If you're doing high volume training in a persistent calorie/protein deficit, injury is just a matter of time.
It's becoming apparent that my thinking on low volume training is different to most.
If my life was super busy and I only had 5 hrs a week to exercise, what would I do?
A quick thread 👇
a) I would walk a lot throughout the day
b) I would do daily yoga
c) I would do short, regular strength work.
d) If I couldn't challenge my metabolism with movement, I would challenge it with nutrition.
Why would I take this approach...
Because if my life is so busy that I can barely squeeze in an hour a day, the best thing that I can do for myself physically is to mitigate some of the stress coming from the rest of my life....
It seems that this technology topic is pretty polarizing! So, let's keep at it! 😊
I do get it. There is some useless crap out there.
So what *doesn't* fall under the category of useless crap? What "technology" do I recommend? And why?
A brief thread 👇
1/
What: A reliable Heart Rate Monitor
Why: When it comes to exercise prescription, internal load matters! I want to know how much internal stress the athlete is under for a given external load. Heart rate provides an easy window into that.
2/
What: A proven #HRV tool (e.g. ithlete, HRV4Training) + my quality heart rate strap
Why: Training load only makes up a small % of the overall stress for most athletes. HRV provides an otherwise invisible window to the *global* stress on the athlete's nervous system.
So, now that we're all agreed on just how important having an #AerobicBase of strong #FatBurning is...
Just how do we go about building one?
A brief thread... 👇
Above you'll see data from 10 recent metabolic tests for athletes that I also have training data for.
They range from
- recreational athletes <-> elite
- super strong #FatBurners of 11kcal/min <-> athletes with very poor max fat oxidation rates of 2kcal/min..
You can see their average training intensity for the 12 mo before the test plotted against their test results. The first takeaway is obvious..
Athletes with a strong ability to use fat as a substrate spend more of their time training at a very low intensity than those who don't!
Above you'll see one of me early metabolic tests from ~16 years ago.
The black is my fat burning, the gray is my CHO burn.
As you can see, in my threshold zone, fat burning dropped to zero and every minute at 280-300W cost me ~20kcal worth of CHO stores, i.e 1200kcal/hr!
Below is another test from an elite Ironman guy.
Even though his threshold is higher than mine, he was still burning ~7kcal/min of fat in his threshold zone, i.e. even though riding *harder*, it was only costing him 13kcal/min (780 kcal/hr) from his CHO stores!