π§΅ Here you will find Maps πΊοΈ to understand the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, I hope.
1. Languages spoken at Home
2. Ethnolinguistic Map
3. Map of Dialects
4. Percentage of People stating that Russian is their Mother Tongue (2001)
5. Support for Russian as an official state language
6. Proportion of users, who stated their mother tongue as Russian (blue) or as Ukrainian (red) in the social media network @vkontakte
7. Religious Divisions
8. Voting Map in 1994
Kuchma vs Kravchuk
9. 2004 Elections (First Round)
10. 2004 Elections (Second Round)
Yanukovych vs Yuschenko
11. 2004 Elections (Third Round)
12. 2006 Elections (Party of The Regions)
13. Parliamentary Elections of 2007
14. First round of Presidential elections of 2010
Legend
Blue/ Dark blue β Yanukovich
Red: Timoshenko
15. 2014 Elections - Turnout
34.76% refused to vote
16. Attitudes to United States Role in Crisis
17. Attitudes towards joining the EU
18. Summary So Far - A Divided Nation
Politically, Ethno-Linguistically,Socially
Conflict Becomes Inevitable
Ask Northern Ireland
19. Why the Division?
Eastern and Southern Ukraine (Light Green in Map) were former constituent parts of Russia that were added to the Ukrainian Soviet Republic by Soviet Communist Party leaders when Ukraine and Russia were two parts of the same country.
23. Since the disputed Crimean referendum, the Maidan Uprising in 2013 & the 2014 elections, US, CIA, UK and NATO decided to support Ukraine with military training & weapons, as discussed in another thread:
Critical Examination of 3 Related Studies on SARS-CoV-2 Origins
My latest paper, a pleasantly vicious critique, reveals exactly how the zoonati clique try to bamboozle gullible journalists and scientists to drive their biased narrative of natural originresearchgate.net/publication/40β¦
2. This core interpretive move by the authors, from failure to detect a shift in selection pressure to claiming strong evidence of βno adaptation being requiredβ, exemplifies the pernicious absence of evidence-based reasoning so characteristic of their tedious papers.
3. Yet, a small cluster of publications from a recurring group of agenda driven authors continues to exert disproportionate and malign influence on the debate over the origins of SARS-COV-2.
1. A truly stunning example of what is called an "ad hoc hypothesis", i.e. a secondary hypothesis added to a theory specifically to save it from being falsified when evidence for its original version is missing or contradictory.
2. They used a modeling framework called RELAX to claim that viruses like SARSCoV2 may already have the ability to infect humans whilst in their natural reservoir, meaning an intermediate host or long-term adaptation wouldn't leave the evolutionary footprints previously expected.
3. A classic post hoc justification for the absence of physical evidence by grant stuffed criminals, in short:
I couldn't find the evidence I said was required, so I've invented a theory that explains why the evidence I failed to find was never actually needed in the first place
1. The long awaited 293 questions for Dr. Ralph Baric have finally been completed and shared! Long live the quest for truth! You are hereby invited to read the sharpest, most lethal 293-question dossier ever built.
1. "These tiny fragments were far smaller than cells and even smaller than many viruses. Some were close to the size of DNA strands. Under high magnification, she noticed small hooked shapes with sharp points.
β΄οΈ2. OVERLOOKED
"She realized that the plastic in human brains was not only present, but surprisingly small. The fragments were so tiny that common diagnostic tools could not detect them. Pathologists had likely been overlooking them for years."
"The two original samples showed a strong link between plastic particles and dementia. As Bearer expanded her work to ten more donated brains, she found plastic in every single one. None were free of synthetic fragments."
Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
π§΅3. Summary of Redfield's Statements
(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)
He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.
He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.