1. Hello Radix’ers, @akgungor_c here. I’m glad to be with you this week. It will be a pleasure for me to post here. My thing is to generate and “mobilize” information & knowledge to assist organizations and communities with respect to emergencies & disasters.
2. An eternity ago, I defended a Ph.D. thesis in political science in which I had mainly focused on #disaster and #sociopolitical#change. At that time, I thought I would not spend a single more minute on that text but instead leave it to collect dust in the French archives.
3. And after I walked away from academia, I literally forgot about it for a long period, until a couple of years ago. In fact, I’m catching myself -more and more- thinking about some of the conclusions I had drawn back then.
4. I had started to work on “the birth of #civil#society” discourse we had observed following the great #Marmara#earthquakes in Turkey in 1999, to end up with an analysis of all major quakes from 1939 to 1999.
5. Looking at that country today, I see how the disaster had been useful to me as an analysis “tool” and how it allowed me to develop pretty accurate arguments about the shape of the things to come.
6. My closing paragraph was something along the lines of “…as we have shown it, Turkish society still seems to seek for its identity… and its itinerary will be shaped by the outcomes of the conflict between the secular “new” middle class and the neo-conservators.”
7. Not bad, eh? But the Turkish case isn’t what I want to tweet about. I’m interested in discussing what the disaster can show us from a sociopolitical (and even organizational) perspective, rather than elaborating on a particular case.
9. Hello again, @akgungor_c continues from where he has left :) So, I tend to think of #disasters as systemic “radiographs”. I’m not sure when I first came up with this analogy but I usually associate this idea with my own experience as a search & rescue volunteer.
10. After all, looking around in a disaster-stricken zone, few people don't come to reflect on their own #vulnerability first, then, gradually, about the vulnerability of human societies to massive #disruptions.
11. The greater the impact, the thinner seems the protective bubble provided by our physical and social systems.
This week we will be talking all about #vulnerability. A critical concept in disaster studies but one that has generally been used in a limited way!
I think a good place to start this conversation is with the Pressure and Release (PAR) model, from a book most of you probably know, 'At Risk.' This model charts 'the progression of vulnerability' and underpins the vulnerability paradigm that many disaster scholars draw upon.
The paradigm has been effective in framing disasters as socially constructed, and locating the creation of risk in political and economic processes that are unjust, privileging some and oppressing others.
RADIX stands for Radical Interpretations of Disasters. It was established by Ben Wisner (@WisnerBen) & Maureen Fordham (@MF_GDG) in 2001, inspired by major disasters in the preceding decade.
RADIX is a collaborative space to share contents that could help to develop radical disaster scholarship & practice. Many of you are perhaps following the RADIX Listserv (and if you don't, you really should 😉).
RADIX is radical because it is concerned with both root causes of disaster & structural actions to prevent disasters from the ‘bottom up’ as well as the ‘top down’.