9. Hello again, @akgungor_c continues from where he has left :) So, I tend to think of #disasters as systemic “radiographs”. I’m not sure when I first came up with this analogy but I usually associate this idea with my own experience as a search & rescue volunteer.
10. After all, looking around in a disaster-stricken zone, few people don't come to reflect on their own #vulnerability first, then, gradually, about the vulnerability of human societies to massive #disruptions.
11. The greater the impact, the thinner seems the protective bubble provided by our physical and social systems.
12. When an #acute event overloads our systems, it disrupts the “business as usual”,
affecting everything from our simple daily, routine activities as individuals to complex, collective processes.
13. These moments of temporary #paralysis are a sort of “moment of truth”, in the sense that they reveal -undeniably- not only the #vulnerabilities but also point out the social, economic, political, cultural factors underlying them.
14. This relatively short timeframe may turn into a period where all the usual controls over the expression can be bypassed due to the temporary paralysis induced by the catastrophe.
15. These are the moments where a questioning about the loss (especially the human toll) may lead to a larger #public#debate on the way(s) a community/society chooses to live, to be organized, to interact with its own environment… and what/how things could be different.
16. And this is where our X-ray picture starts to take shape, allowing us to observe and analyze what could otherwise stay under our radars.
17. The public debate mentioned above is a particularly rich source for this purpose, so I’ll continue tomorrow by elaborating on that one. Thanks for reading, see you soon.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Hello Radix’ers, @akgungor_c here. I’m glad to be with you this week. It will be a pleasure for me to post here. My thing is to generate and “mobilize” information & knowledge to assist organizations and communities with respect to emergencies & disasters.
2. An eternity ago, I defended a Ph.D. thesis in political science in which I had mainly focused on #disaster and #sociopolitical#change. At that time, I thought I would not spend a single more minute on that text but instead leave it to collect dust in the French archives.
3. And after I walked away from academia, I literally forgot about it for a long period, until a couple of years ago. In fact, I’m catching myself -more and more- thinking about some of the conclusions I had drawn back then.
This week we will be talking all about #vulnerability. A critical concept in disaster studies but one that has generally been used in a limited way!
I think a good place to start this conversation is with the Pressure and Release (PAR) model, from a book most of you probably know, 'At Risk.' This model charts 'the progression of vulnerability' and underpins the vulnerability paradigm that many disaster scholars draw upon.
The paradigm has been effective in framing disasters as socially constructed, and locating the creation of risk in political and economic processes that are unjust, privileging some and oppressing others.
RADIX stands for Radical Interpretations of Disasters. It was established by Ben Wisner (@WisnerBen) & Maureen Fordham (@MF_GDG) in 2001, inspired by major disasters in the preceding decade.
RADIX is a collaborative space to share contents that could help to develop radical disaster scholarship & practice. Many of you are perhaps following the RADIX Listserv (and if you don't, you really should 😉).
RADIX is radical because it is concerned with both root causes of disaster & structural actions to prevent disasters from the ‘bottom up’ as well as the ‘top down’.