As #WearAMask trends, we mustn’t forget how mask mandates arose. Recall in March/April/May of the first wave (2020) masks were not mandatory. Some people who were very scared wore masks. Public health experts like Fauci or @CPHO_Canada reminded us the science didn’t support that.
But the mask wearers became resentful that everybody did not share their paralyzing fear. And this is when suddenly the propaganda arose that masking apparently healthy people was about ‘protecting others’. The purpose of this line of fallacy was to defeat any argument of choice.
We now have ample data from Canada and elsewhere, that COVID is seasonal & mask mandates did little-to-nothing to affect the spread.
But the mask-wearers are just as resentful as they were before—even more so now since the wide-scale abandonment of masks will give us more data.
#WearAMask if you want, but if you are honest you’ll realize the theatre serves no valid purpose for most people and in most situations. The mandatory masking of apparently healthy people indoors does virtually nothing to affect the spread of COVID, and it’s grotesque.
Seeing the faces of other humans is one of the small things which makes life worth living. If masks were highly effective at stopping the spread, then maybe mandates might have had a temporary place. But mandates are ineffective & mask wearing is anti-human. It’s time to #MaskOff
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Publication ban is reiterated. Counsel for the defence raised how it had been breached previously. Judge says he doesn’t refer to the “proposed surety” by name. Not a good sign that he said that.
Tamara Lich’s Bail (Review) decision is now under way — Johnston, J. Orally:
Tamara Lich has a “Bail Review” today beginning at 10:30AM in Ottawa.
I hope to provide periodic updates on it via Twitter, please follow if you’d like to receive them.
Justice John Johnston of the Superior Court will preside. He’s a Harper appointment & former defence lawyer but that doesn’t guarantee anything. He’s smart & unbiased, but this case will be vigorously argued on both sides with the burden on the defence to overturn the bail ruling
A bail review is essentially an Appeal of the bail ruling which currently denied bail to Tamara Lich. There are two ways in which the review can be granted: 1) a change in circumstances, or 2) an error in law.
🇨🇦 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 🇨🇦
The last two years have been very much about what kind of country we want to live in, and about what the role of government should be.
Are we supposed to live in a country where government attempts to be the solution to problems?
🧵 ⬇️
Or do we want to live in a country where government secures rights for its citizens and fosters the environment to allow people to pursue their own destiny?
COVID 19 presented challenges. It made people very scared. & so the government pursued a course which could only make sense to people who were very scared.
As many said at the outset, we cannot allow the “cure” to be worse than the disease. What ensued however was exactly that.
I have been receiving numerous emails and DMs relating to the hacking of #GiveSendGo and your personal info being doxed/leaked.
Unless you have run into an actual specific problem (account being closed) police contacting you, etc., I cannot assist. Even if I do share your anger.
You may wish to consult a civil litigation lawyer if you’d like to consider a cause of action. This is not my area of expertise despite the fact that I am outraged like you are.
I am not a civil litigation lawyer.
I regret that I cannot respond to every message that simply points out the outrageous nature of the hacking and of the media’s unscrupulous actions taken since. I agree with you but I am currently dealing with many cases including those related to the protest.
I’m getting a deluge of calls about people who are worried about having donated to @GiveSendGo
Once again, this thread is not legal advice but it can be useful information.
First, don’t panic. For reasons elaborated on out below, I am not convinced that past donations are illegal. I am also not saying they aren’t either; but for starters, assume you’re okay until and unless you hear otherwise; no point in stressing yourself out.
Second, don’t discuss the matter with anybody other than a lawyer. I’ve heard stories of the @CBCNews contacting people to confirm details. Do not discuss your donation with anybody and especially not the media.
I keep seeing this chart circulating — I encourage everyone to read it’s methodology. It is one of the most dishonest surveys I’ve ever seen in my life and I break it down in this thread. 🧵
The proposition they advance is “the more uninformed you are, the less you support vaccine passports”.
So in order to measure how “uninformed” someone is, they asked 7 questions and the more affirmatively people answered, the more uninformed this study claims they are.
Makes sense…if those 7 false statements are, in fact false.
So what are those questions/statements?
Here they are; read them and see for yourself how broken this study is.