For more examples see benjaminmoll.com/RussianGas_Sub…, e.g. some of you may have "fond" memories of mask production in the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic
6/
The second part of the supplement makes some general observations on substitution in the macroeconomy.
There is an important distinction between a micro "engineering view" of substitution that focuses on individual production processes and a more general "economic view".
7/
Key observation: zero substitution at "micro-micro" level of individual production processes does not mean zero substitution in aggregate economy
How so? Simply because such production processes will be replaced by new better processes
This can also be true for entire firms
8/
Or perhaps we simply import some of the goods that become too expensive to produce domestically.
This idea goes back to a classic 1955 @RevEconStudies paper by Houthakker: even if individual technologies are Leontief (elasticity = 0) they may aggregate up to a Cobb-Douglas production (elasticity = 1)
@ChadJonesEcon discusses the result with the usual lucidity.
10/
The discussion is therefore subject to a classic "micro-to-macro fallacy".
Interesting corollary: industry representative saying "little substitution is possible" may well be right from "engineering perspective". But this would still be a biased view of the macroeconomy.
11/
Summary: these examples and considerations aim to show the surprising adaptability of the free-market economy.
@fetzert puts it well: "Let this adaptability shine. If not now then when?"
🤓 Nerd tweet for the heterogeneous-agent macro crowd
You like sequence-space Jacobians? But you also like working in continuous time?
Then I have just the thing for you! 🤓
Two very nice recent papers and some code:
1. René Glawion's very nice continuous-time implementation of the @a_auclert @BardoczyBence Rognlie @ludwigstraub sequence-space method:
- “Sequence-Space Jacobians in Continuous Time”
- GitHub repository with codes papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf… github.com/reneglawion/Se…
2. @AdrienBilal and Shlok Goyal's paper on the same topic
- "Some Pleasant Sequence-Space Arithmetic in Continuous Time"
New study on China decoupling using similar approach to our work on the Russian gas cut-off.
Punchline: our results provide a rationale for embarking on gradual de-risking trajectory to avoid a much more costly cold turkey decoupling dictated by geopolitical events
1. Cold-turkey decoupling would be costly: "financial crisis in short-run + Brexit in long-run" is good way of thinking about it. So costly though still not Armageddon.
2. More gradual decoupling or de-risking --> smaller costs because it avoids the most extreme short run losses
So one can view the relatively low economic costs of gradual de-risking as an insurance premium paid to insure against the possibility of large losses and potential political backlash associated with a hard cold-turkey decoupling.
It's about Bob's incredible gift as a writer and his generosity toward his students.
It's the fall of 2009 and I'm a grad student at the University of Chicago. Bob is on my thesis committee.
I've just finished a first draft of my job market paper with which I will be applying for assistant professor jobs. I've put *a ton* of work into the paper and I'm pretty happy with it overall. I email it to Bob asking whether he could take a look, hoping for some verbal comments
Below is what it looked like at the time.
A day later Bob emails me back saying "Come by my office, I've got some minor comments."