VoicesforPYLUSD Profile picture
Mar 23 11 tweets 3 min read
Another look at the risk to AP designation if the CRT Ban passes from the @ocregister @roxanakopetman
ocregister.com/2022/03/22/a-p…
Let's review what CRT is, in light of the fact that proponents of these bans think ANYTHING that mentions race or equity is CRT
americanbar.org/groups/crsj/pu…
Recognition that race is not biologically real but is socially constructed and socially significant.
Acknowledgement that racism is a normal feature of society and is embedded within systems and institutions...
Rejection of popular understandings about racism, such as arguments that confine racism to a few “bad apples.”
Recognition of the relevance of people’s everyday lives to scholarship. This includes embracing the lived experiences of people of color...
CRT observes that scholarship that ignores race is not demonstrating “neutrality” but adherence to the existing racial hierarchy. For instance...
This is about undermining ethnic studies and diversity and inclusion. That has been the aim since campaign season 2020. That was the aim when they removed African Americans from a resolution in May '21.
When Blades and Youngblood show you who they are, believe them.
Oppose the CRT Ban. #teach truth #teach the truth #DiversityAndInclusion #RepresentationMatters

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with VoicesforPYLUSD

VoicesforPYLUSD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NPylusd

Mar 24
Here is our understanding of tonight's meeting and where we stand with the CRT Ban
A few changes were made. Most notably, removal of the six bullet points that were replaced with another definition. We can not confirm the text of that new definition.
The lawyer suggested that instead of the ban they put board policy 6144, which is to do with teaching controversial topics.
(Multiple versions across the state are easily searchable)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(