1) On May 18, 2020 Barr declared that Durham’s investigation into the origins of the Russiagate hoax wasn’t focused on Obama or Joe Biden.
Barr's claim is an often underappreciated statement, the fallout of which was felt throughout the 2020 presidential election.
Barr's claim is an often underappreciated statement, the fallout of which was felt throughout the 2020 presidential election.
2) Although Barr now claims that he issued his statement from a position of fairness, what he actually did was insert himself into the presidential campaign.
In doing so, he set the stage for media’s whitewashing of corruption questions that surrounded Biden during the campaign.
In doing so, he set the stage for media’s whitewashing of corruption questions that surrounded Biden during the campaign.
3) Barr’s May 18 statement also stands in stark contrast to his decision to remain silent after the second presidential debate in October 2020, when Biden falsely blamed the story about his son Hunter’s laptop on a “Russian plot.”
4) Barr recently told Fox News that Biden “was squarely confronted with the laptop and he suggested that it was Russian disinformation. … And I was shocked by that. … When you’re talking about interference in an election, I can’t think of anything more than that kind of thing.”
5) Barr’s supposed “shock” over Biden’s claims of Russian disinformation during the debate begs a simple question:
If Barr actually felt that Biden’s assertions of “Russian disinformation” amounted to “interference in an election,” why didn’t Barr say anything at the time?
If Barr actually felt that Biden’s assertions of “Russian disinformation” amounted to “interference in an election,” why didn’t Barr say anything at the time?
6) There is another troubling aspect to this as well.
Four different CIA directors lied for Biden.
And they did so to publicly promote false allegations about Russia in order to shield their preferred presidential candidate from public attention.
politico.com/f/?id=00000175…
Four different CIA directors lied for Biden.
And they did so to publicly promote false allegations about Russia in order to shield their preferred presidential candidate from public attention.
politico.com/f/?id=00000175…
7) Barr claims he was concerned about a potential repeat of the 2016 election Russia-Collusion claims.
But if this was true, it would have been incumbent on Barr to step forward publicly as soon as Biden & the Intelligence Community made the false accusations against Russia.
But if this was true, it would have been incumbent on Barr to step forward publicly as soon as Biden & the Intelligence Community made the false accusations against Russia.
8) Barr also acknowledged the massive geopolitical damage caused by the Clinton campaign’s Russiagate hoax.
But he inexplicably ignored Biden’s false claims about "Russia disinformation" re: his son’s laptop.
New from @HansMahncke & myself.
theepochtimes.com/how-bill-barrs…
But he inexplicably ignored Biden’s false claims about "Russia disinformation" re: his son’s laptop.
New from @HansMahncke & myself.
theepochtimes.com/how-bill-barrs…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
