Melissa Chan Profile picture
Mar 26 2 tweets 1 min read
Mearsheimer’s argument is basically the “she wore a short skirt” justification.
As a woman covering foreign policy, and simply as a woman in society who sees regular justification of male violence, in this case it’s Putin’s toxic masculinity against Ukraine — but Mearsheimer’s position isn’t just a “take,” it is morally deplorable and based on misogyny.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Melissa Chan

Melissa Chan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @melissakchan

Mar 22
Good morning from Europe, where China Radio International (Chinese state media) — in Poland — in Polish — has a frontpage with no refugees, no war, but a headline reading: "If America really cares about Ukrainians, it should provide peace, not weapons."
Further down the frontpage of Chinese state media's website in Polish, Beijing wants the people of Poland to know that "Polish dairy products are increasingly welcomed by Chinese consumers." There is no other mention of Ukraine beyond the slam against the US.
Let's go to CGTN Français — Chinese state media's French language outlet for people in France. There is no coverage of war in Ukraine on the frontpage, although there is an article about "dark US biolabs in Ukraine."
Read 12 tweets
Mar 10
🇷🇺's Lavrov says that Putin would not refuse to meet Zelensky but it depends. ➡️ Russia first demanded talks in Minsk, rejected 🇺🇦's proposal to meet in Istanbul. Now open in theory to a Putin-Zelensky meeting, implicit there is they are equal heads of state. Quite the climbdown.
On the downside: 🇷🇺's Lavrov continues the messaging that this is all about the 🇺🇸 meddling, ignoring 🇺🇦's ability as a sovereign country to have its own agency. Russian message aligns with the same thing we're seeing 🇨🇳 say. No country has any agency, every country is a tool.
🇷🇺's Lavrov also takes issue that oil and gas trade have been wielded like weapons, conveniently forgetting the actual Russian weapons murdering Ukrainian civilians including babies.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 24
The prevailing belief from experts the last few weeks is that Putin wouldn't try something like this. Not a criticism of expertise but it's a reminder that rational people analyzing things do not take into account enough the possibility that some autocrats are crazy.
I see the same approach to analyzing Xi Jinping. There is an assumption he is rational, this is why he wouldn't do X or Y. But what if hubris, being surrounded by yes men, and power make men nuts? Not enough credence is given to this possibility in foreign policy.
Erdoğan is another example. He's chosen to ignore all his economists and run economic policy in his country (strong "I alone can fix it" energy here), leading to a collapse of the lira and debilitating inflation in Turkey. This was not rational, and yet he did it anyway.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 8
Chinese Olympian Eileen Gu says she's happy Peng Shuai is "out there doing her thing again." Except Peng literally announced the opposite: her retirement — and did so likely under duress. Gu has sought to avoid politics, but her comments align with Beijing's.
Eileen Gu is an amazing athlete who won gold with that amazing left double 1620. She also towed the Party line on Peng Shuai. In many ways we should not expect such young athletes to comment on human rights. But an 18-year-old knows what a rape accusation is and Gu gaslit Peng.
A lot of Olympic athletes switch country representation. This happens. The reason why Eileen Gu is getting so much attention is because she decided to rep a country where we've had a steady stream of Uyghurs the last few years escape and talk about the horrors of detention camps.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 31
My piece: Is it time to consider a word other than "authoritarian" to describe China? "Fascism: a surveillance state with a strongman invoking racism, nationalism and traditional family values at home, while building up a military for expansion abroad." washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
The state has also become fixated on machismo, another fascist obsession. It bans what it considers “effeminate” behavior. It exhorts men and women to procreate — focusing on Han Chinese, while doing the opposite with ethnic minorities like Uyghurs.
When I was in Beijing, the foreign press corps described China as authoritarian when necessary — but entire articles concerning China’s political system could also be written without mentioning the word. Now "authoritarian" is commonly used. But is it time to reassess this?
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(