You found a Swedish #nocovid fan to push your Australian narrative through a Swedish first author into Nature “Humanities & Social Sciences Communications”.
Well done, nasty move.
I fell sorry for Nele and her students. It won't be a career booster in the science community.
Dear @DavidSteadson what kind of services do you offer behind “Behavioral Engineering”?
Was the behavior “paper” part of the service portfolio?
Some highlights. Regarding the 1st author: This would be a reason for termination of employment if the university was functional. This is shameful for an university staff. It’s activism, propaganda and framing.
It looks like we are digging out the dirt here. Of course those radicals are everywhere.
But the Swedish (contrary to AT and DE) system is designed to sustain such attacks fortunately.
- most of the cases will be male (unfortunately InEK doesn't breakdown by sex).
-Vaccination level of around 50% for Germany in this age group 18-29. So around 2.5M total
Result: it gives an incidence of around 1:10k in line with the current AE DBs findings.
3/ The real incidence may be higher than 1:10k as we are seeing the accounted hospitalized cases (so the more serious ones).
Many or even most (milder) cases may be undetected and potentially lead to other troubles later. Who knows...
2/ Creating this type of control data (SWE) must be prevented at all cost in future. There must be one and only one autocratic response. Masking 2 year olds for example. The WHO (a group many autocratic countries) shall rule democratic countries like Sweden and the Netherlands.
3/ What @MarionKoopmans probably means is, that everyone should be like Germany now and not the other way around.
So the WHO (an organisation outside of law with total immunity) needs worldwide total powers to enforce and overrule those freedom seeking democratic nations.
Germany doesn’t want to take reference from the free NW neighbors (all more democratic countries) who have lower mortality, higher life expectancy and lower child mortality (unmasked).