1/ This has always been disturbing to read for me.
"no safety pharmacology studies were conducted…as they are not considered necessary for the development of vaccines according to the WHO guideline (WHO, 2005)"
They applied an outdated spec to qualify a disruptive technology.
2/ When a disruptive new technology enters the aerospace and automotive market, this is done through an ultra rigorous/conservative work on the standardisation part. New standards are mandatory. One doesn't use the silicon Power MOSFET test methods / standards to qualify GaN.
3/ R&D on such technologies and the work in defining new appropriate standards/methods are done in parallel.
Both need hard work on real samples. R&D works on yield while standards work on test, screening and qualification methods to ensure a safe reliable product.
- most of the cases will be male (unfortunately InEK doesn't breakdown by sex).
-Vaccination level of around 50% for Germany in this age group 18-29. So around 2.5M total
Result: it gives an incidence of around 1:10k in line with the current AE DBs findings.
3/ The real incidence may be higher than 1:10k as we are seeing the accounted hospitalized cases (so the more serious ones).
Many or even most (milder) cases may be undetected and potentially lead to other troubles later. Who knows...
2/ Creating this type of control data (SWE) must be prevented at all cost in future. There must be one and only one autocratic response. Masking 2 year olds for example. The WHO (a group many autocratic countries) shall rule democratic countries like Sweden and the Netherlands.
3/ What @MarionKoopmans probably means is, that everyone should be like Germany now and not the other way around.
So the WHO (an organisation outside of law with total immunity) needs worldwide total powers to enforce and overrule those freedom seeking democratic nations.